UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No. __)

Filed by the Registrant    
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant    

Check the appropriate box:

Preliminary Proxy Statement

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule
14a-6(e)(2))

Definitive Proxy Statement

Definitive Additional Materials

Soliciting Material Pursuant to
§240.14a-12

Trustmark Corporation

(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

  

  

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

No fee required.

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.

(1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5)

Total fee paid:

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials

materials.

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as providedFee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2)Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

1)

Amount Previously Paid:

2)

Form, Schedule or Registration No.:

3)

Filing Party:

4)

Date Filed:

0-11.


LOGOLOGO                 

 

LOGO             LOGO


Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders

The 20212023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Trustmark Corporation (Trustmark) will be held as follows:

DATE AND TIME

DATE AND TIME

Tuesday, April 25, 2023, at 1:00 p.m. CT

LOCATION

Trustmark Corporate Office

248 East Capitol Street

Jackson, Mississippi 39201

 ITEMS OF BUSINESS

1)  To elect a board of 11 directors to hold office for the ensuing year or until their successors are elected and qualified.

2)  To provide advisory approval of Trustmark’s executive compensation.

3)  To provide an advisory vote on the frequency of advisory votes on Trustmark’s executive compensation.

4)  To approve an amendment and restatement of Trustmark’s articles of incorporation to provide for exculpation of directors in accordance with Mississippi law.

5)  To ratify the selection of Crowe LLP as Trustmark’s independent auditor for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2023.

6)  To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting.

LOGO

Tuesday, April 27, 2021, at 1:00 p.m. CT

VIRTUAL ATTENDANCE

Due to the public health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Annual Meeting will be held virtually. You will be able to attend, vote and submit questions during the Annual Meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/TRMK2021 and entering the 16-digit control number printed in the box marked by the arrow on your proxy card or printed on your voting instruction form, notice of internet availability of proxy materials, or email previously received.

ITEMS OF BUSINESS

1) To elect a board of 12 directors to hold office for the ensuing year or until their successors are elected and qualified.

2) To provide advisory approval of Trustmark’s executive compensation.

3) To ratify the selection of Crowe LLP as Trustmark’s independent auditor for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021.

4) To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting.

RECORD DATE

Shareholders of record on March 1, 2021,2023, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting.

PROXY VOTING/REVOCATION

Your vote is important. You are urged to vote your shares as soon as possible, whether or not you plan to attend the meeting. Please vote your shares in one of the following ways:

You may voteVia Internet by following the instructions on the Notice of Internet Availability or proxy card.

Via your shares by Internetsmartphone by following the instructions on the Notice of Internet Availability or proxy card.

If you received a printed copy of the proxy statement, you may also vote your shares by signing and returning the enclosed proxy card in the enclosed reply envelope.envelope provided.

If you attend the meeting, you may revoke your proxy prior to the voting thereof. You may also revoke your proxy by following the instructions on page 4 of the proxy statement.

 

LOGOLOGO

Granville Tate, Jr.

Secretary

March 15, 20212023

 

LOGO             LOGO


 

 

LOGOLOGO


LOGO

LOGO

  

Trustmark Corporation

P. O. Box 291

Jackson, Mississippi 39205

March 15, 20212023

Dear Shareholder:

On behalf of your Board of Directors, we cordially invite you to attend Trustmark’s Annual Shareholders’ Meeting at Trustmark’s Corporate Office, 248 East Capitol Street, Jackson, Mississippi 39201, on April 27, 2021,25, 2023, at 1:00 p.m. CT. Due to the public health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, the meeting will be held virtually. At the meeting, you will have the opportunity to elect twelve11 directors who bring diverse perspectives and valuable leadership skills to Trustmark. Their guidance will enable us to successfully compete in an evolving industry and continue our steadfast commitment to the customers, associates, shareholders and communities we have the privilege of serving. Your vote is important to us. The proposals to be considered are described in this proxy statement, and instructions on how to vote your shares may be found on page 4. We encourage you to vote your shares in advance of the meeting to ensure the presence of a quorum.

This past year has been an extremely challenging time for everyone. The effects ofWe made significant progress across the COVID-19 pandemic significantly impactedorganization during the waysyear. Loan growth in which we live, work2022 was the highest in Trustmark’s history. Credit quality remained strong. Net interest income and interact with one another. As an essentialthe net interest margin were up significantly. Our insurance business in the communities we serve, our associates quickly adapted and found new ways to serve customers and meet their financial needs during these unprecedented times. Customers embraced our digital banking platforms, and many associates transitioned to a remote work environment. While not without challenges, our associates never missed a beat.posted another record year. We also leveragedmade significant investments in technology, including conversion to a state-of-the-art loan system designed to enhance efficiency and learned lessonsproductivity. With all of these positive advancements, our financial results were overshadowed by a settlement that, have strengthenedpending court approval, will resolve all current and potential future claims relating to litigation involving the organization.

During 2020,Stanford Financial Group that began in 2009. While we continuedexpressly deny any liability or wrongdoing with respect to build uponthis matter, we believe the settlement is in the best interest of Trustmark and our shareholders as it eliminates risk, ongoing expense and uncertainty. With this matter now behind us, we will focus more intently on the future and the opportunities that are ahead. Trustmark is very well-positioned to serve and expand its customer relationships as reflected by solid growth in our banking, mortgage banking, wealth managementbase and insurance businesses. Net income and diluted earnings per share reached record levels, and we continued investments to enhance our franchise and competitive position. We also returned capital to shareholders through consistent quarterly dividends, and we made significant contributions to strengthen our communities. create long-term value for shareholders.

We invite you to review our Form 10-K and our 20202022 Year in Review, both of which are available at investorrelations. trustmark.cominvestorrelations.trustmark.com or in hard copy upon request. These documents will provide more detailed information about your company.

Thank you for your continued support of Trustmark and your participation in this important process.

Sincerely,

 

LOGOLOGO  LOGOLOGO

Gerard R. Host

Chair of the Board

  

Duane A. Dewey

Executive Chairman

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

LOGOLOGO


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

PROXY SUMMARY

  1

Information About the 20212023 Annual Meeting

   1 

Proposals

   1 

Financial Highlights - 2020– 2022

   1 

Corporate Governance Highlights

   1 

Executive Compensation Highlights

   2 

Environmental, Social and Governance/Corporate Social Responsibility (ESG/CSR)

   2 

GENERAL INFORMATION

  3

Introduction

   3 

Meeting Location, Date and Time

   3 

Shareholders Entitled to Vote

   3 

Required Vote

   3 

How to Vote

   4 

Revoking Your Proxy

   4 

Voting on Other Matters

   4 

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

  4

Overview

   4

Recent Developments

5 

Key Features of Trustmark’s Corporate Governance

   5 

Meetings of the Board of Directors

   5 

Director Attendance at the Annual Meeting

   6 

Director Independence

   6 

Board Leadership

   6 

Committees of the Board of Directors

   6 

Audit & Finance Committee

   76 

Enterprise Risk Committee

   7 

Executive Committee

   7 

Finance Committee

7

Human Resources Committee

   7 

Nominating & Governance Committee

   8 

Board Oversight of Risk Management

   8 

Committee Membership

   89 

Communications with Directors

   9 

Nomination of Directors

   9 

Environmental, Social and Governance/Corporate Social Responsibility (ESG/CSR)

   910

Board Oversight

10

CSR Engagement and Investment

10

Human Capital and Workforce Diversity

11

Environmental Sustainability

11 

Director Qualifications

   1011 

Personal Traits

   1011 

Leadership Qualities

   1012 

Individual Competencies

   1112 

Specific Director Experience, Qualifications, Attributes and Skills

   1112 

Board Diversity

13

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

  1214

The Nominees

   1214 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

  1719

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

   1719 

Guiding Philosophy

   1719 

Key Elements of Compensation

   1719 

Alignment Between Pay and Performance

   1820 

20202022 Say on Pay Vote

   1820 

Board and Committee Process

   1821 

Role of the Compensation Consultant

   1921 

Benchmarking

   1921 

Peer Group Data

   1921 

Market Data

   2022 

Compensation Mix

   2022 


Base Salaries

   2123 

Cash Bonuses

   2123 

Annual Management Incentive Plan

21

Discretionary Bonuses

23


Mortgage Production Bonus

   23 

Equity-Based Compensation

   2325 

Performance Awards

   2425 

Time-based Awards

   2426 

Retirement Benefits

   2527 

Executive Deferral Plan

   2527 

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan

   2627 

Perquisites; Other Benefits

   2628 

Severance and Change in Control Benefits

   2628 

Deductibility of Compensation

   2728 

Policy Against Hedging and Limitations on Pledging

   2728 

Stock Ownership Guidelines

   2729 

Executive Compensation Recoupment

   2729 

Analysis of Risk Associated with Trustmark’s Compensation Policies and Practices

   2729 

Summary Compensation Table for 2020

29

All Other Compensation for 20202022

   30 

Grants of Plan-Based AwardsAll Other Compensation for 20202022

   31 

Outstanding EquityGrants of Plan-Based Awards at 2020 Fiscal Year-Endfor 2022

   32

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2022 Fiscal Year-End

33 

Option Exercises and Stock Vested for 2020

33

Pension Benefits for 20202022

   34 

Non-Qualified Deferred CompensationPension Benefits for 20202022

   34

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation for 2022

35 

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

   3536 

Human Resources Committee Report

   3637 

Human Resources Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

   3637 

20202022 Pay Ratio Disclosure

   3637

Pay-Versus-Performance

38

Relationship Between Pay and Performance

38

Actually Paid versus Company Performance

38

Company TSR versus S&P 500 Regional Banks TSR

39

Tabular List of Financial Performance Measures

39 

Employment and Change in Control Agreements with NEOs

   36

Employment Agreements with Mr. Host

36

First Host Agreement

37

Second Host Agreement

3740 

Employment Agreement with Mr. Dewey

   3840 

Certain Defined Terms Used in Second Host Agreement and Dewey Agreement

   3840 

Change in Control Agreements with Other NEOs

   3940 

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

  4041

Director Compensation for 20202022

   4142 

PROPOSAL 2: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

  4142

PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF ADVISORY VOTES ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

43

PROPOSAL 4: APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF TRUSTMARK’S ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION TO PROVIDE FOR EXCULPATION OF DIRECTORS IN ACCORDANCE WITH MISSISSIPPI LAW

43

PROPOSAL 5: RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR

  4244

AUDIT & FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT

  4244

Principal Accountant Fees

   4245 

Pre-Approval Policy

   4345 

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

  4345

BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF TRUSTMARK STOCK

  4547

DELINQUENT SECTION 16(a) REPORTS

46

PROPOSALS OF SHAREHOLDERS

  4648

COST OF PROXY SOLICITATION

  4648

AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS

  4748

ANNEX A:   AMENDED AND RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF TRUSTMARK CORPORATION

  49


PROXY SUMMARY

 

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement. Please read the entire proxy statement carefully before voting as this is only a summary.

Information About the 20212023 Annual Meeting

 

Time/Date:Date:

  

Tuesday, April 27, 2021,25, 2023, at 1:00 p.m. CT

Virtual Attendance:

www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/TRMK2021You will be asked to enter your 16-digit control number printed in the box marked by the arrow on your proxy card or Notice of Internet Availability.
Record Date:

Location:

  

Trustmark Corporate Office, 248 East Capitol Street, Jackson, Mississippi 39201

Record Date:

March 1, 20212023

Proposals

 

Proposal

 

Description

Proposal 

Board Recommendation

Proposal 1

Description
 

Board Recommendation

Proposal 1Election of 1211 directors to hold office for the ensuing year or until their
successors are elected and qualified

 

“FOR”

(for each nominee)

Proposal 2

 

Proposal 2Advisory approval of Trustmark’s executive compensation

 

“FOR”

Proposal 3

 

Proposal 3Advisory vote on the frequency of advisory votes on executive compensation“ONE YEAR”
Proposal 4Approval of an amendment and restatement of Trustmark’s articles of incorporation to provide for exculpation of directors in accordance with Mississippi law“FOR”
Proposal 5Ratification of selection of Crowe LLP as Trustmark’s independent
auditor for the fiscal year ending December 31, 20212023
“FOR”

Financial Highlights – 2022

 

· 

“FOR”Loans held for investment (HFI) increased $2.0 billion, or 19.1%, in 2022

Financial Highlights - 2020

·

Nonperforming assets declined to 0.55% of loans HFI and held for sale (HFS)

 

Record net income totaled $160.0 million, up 6.4% from prior year
·

Net charge-offs represented 0.01% of average loans in 2022

 

Diluted earnings per share totaled $2.51, up 8.2% from prior year
·

Net interest income FTE totaled $507.1 million, up 17.9% in 2022 to produce a net interest margin of 3.17%, up 41 basis points from 2021

 

Quarterly dividends of $0.23 per share, or $0.92 per share annually
·

Insurance revenue increased 10.7% in 2022 while wealth management revenue remained stable

 

Return on average tangible equity of 12.58%, up from 12.45% in prior year (See “Alignment Between Pay and Performance” on page 18 for a description of return on average tangible equity)
Loans held for investment increased $488.9 million, or 5.2%, to $9.8 billion from prior year
·

Noninterest income totaled $205.1 million and represented 29.3% of total revenue

 

·

Revenue totaled $699.9 million in 2022, up 9.3% from the prior year

Mortgage loan production reached record level of $3.0 billion, up 69.4% from prior year
·

Noninterest expense, excluding litigation settlement expense of $100.8 million, totaled $502.5 million, up 2.7% from the prior year

 

Deposits increased $2.8 billion, or 24.9%, to $14.0 billion from prior year
·

Net income totaled $71.9 million, representing diluted earnings per share of $1.17. Excluding litigation settlement expense, which reduced net income by $75.6 million, net income totaled $147.5 million, representing diluted earnings per share of $2.40. Information regarding the litigation settlement is included in Trustmark’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 3, 2023.

 

Total risk-based capital ratio of 14.12% at year-end 2020, up from 13.25% at the end of the prior year
·

Paid quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share, or $0.92 per share annually

 

Supported local communities with loan originations totaling $970.0 million through SBA’s Paycheck Protection Program
·

Maintained strong capital position with CET1 ratio of 9.74% and total risk-based capital ratio of 11.91%

·

Expanded market optimization efforts with a net reduction of 11 branch offices during the year

·

Continued technology investments to enhance efficiency and productivity

 

 

Corporate Governance Highlights

 

Nine
·

Eight members of the Board of Directors of Trustmark (the Board) are independent.

Directors must notify Trustmark of changes in professional responsibilities and residence and comply with a directors’ attendance policy.

Directors are subject to Trustmark stock ownership requirements.

The Board has adopted, and annually reviews, formal charters for the Board and its committees to address the governance guidelines and responsibilities of each.

A CEO succession planning process is in place to promote continuity of leadership and an orderly transition upon the CEO’s retirement or other termination of employment.
Directors are required to retire at the age of 70.

The Board has the authority to seek advice or counsel from external advisors as needed.

In the event the Board Chairman is not independent, the Chairman of the Executive Committee, an independent director, serves as Lead Director.

Independent directors meet without management present.

The Board has adopted codes of conduct/ethics for directors, senior financial officers and associates.

The Executive Committee of the Board reviews the corporate governance structure and annually evaluates each director’s performance against specific performance criteria designed to evaluate the director’s contributions.

Executive Compensation Highlights

What we do:

 

·

Directors must notify Trustmark of changes in professional responsibilities and residence and comply with a directors’ attendance policy.

LOGO·

A CEO succession planning process is in place to promote continuity of leadership and an orderly transition upon the CEO’s retirement or other termination of employment.

·

The Board has the authority to seek advice or counsel from external advisors as needed.

1


·

Following a comprehensive review, as of January 1, 2023, the Board approved a number of changes in the Board’s governance structure and processes to enhance its effectiveness in providing oversight and strategic advice to management. See “Corporate Governance – Overview” on page 4.

·

Directors are subject to Trustmark stock ownership requirements.

·

The Board has adopted, and annually reviews, formal charters for the Board and its committees to address the governance guidelines and responsibilities of each.

·

Directors are required to retire at the age of 75.

Executive Compensation Highlights

What we do:

 Substantial portion of executive pay based on performance
against goals set by the Board

LOGO Stock ownership requirements for executive officers

LOGO Independent compensation consultant regularly advises the Human Resources Committee

LOGO Minimum vesting periods of not less than three years for equity awards, with three-year cliff vesting of time-based awards

LOGO Clawback provisions that permit Trustmark to recover incentive-based compensation under certain circumstances

LOGO Use of peer company data to help set executive compensation

LOGO Annual advisory votes on executive compensation

LOGO Oversight of compensation by Human Resources Committee, which is comprised solely of independent directors
What we don’t do:
LOGO· 

In the event the Board Chair is not independent, the Board’s Lead Director, who is independent, shall serve as Chair of the Executive Committee and the Nominating & Governance Committee.

·

Independent directors meet without management present.

·

The Board has adopted codes of conduct/ethics for directors, senior financial officers, and associates.

·

The Nominating & Governance Committee of the Board reviews the corporate governance structure and annually evaluates each director’s performance against specific performance criteria designed to evaluate the director’s contributions.

What we don’t do:

×

No automatic or guaranteed annual salary increases

LOGO ×

No guaranteed bonuses or guaranteed long-term incentive awards

LOGO ×

No tax gross-ups for executive officers

LOGO ×

No “single-trigger” change in control severance payments

LOGO ×

No hedging of Trustmark stock

LOGO ×

No excessive perquisites

 

Corporate

Environmental, Social Responsibility

Committed to robust community engagement, volunteerism and philanthropy to strengthen communities; enhanced focus with appointment of Director of Governance/Corporate Social Responsibility in 2020
Community-based contributions and sponsorships of $5.3 million in 2020 with focus on supporting at-risk children and families and financial literacy
Expanded commitment to financial literacy through EVERFI, Inc.; 9,500 students participated in Trustmark’s Financial Scholars program in 2020(ESG/CSR)

·

Committed to robust community engagement, informed policies and procedures, and responsible philanthropy to strengthen communities

·

Produced and published first annual CSR Impact Report

·

Contributed more than $4 million in 2022 to community-based programs and sponsorships with focus on supporting at-risk children and families and financial literacy initiatives

·

Provided continued financial literacy and individual counseling through partnership with Operation HOPE, Inc., in Memphis, TN, Montgomery, AL and Jackson, MS in 2022

·

Dedicated to serving diverse and underserved communities; enhanced product offerings to meet special credit needs of low-to-moderate income individuals and communities

·

Facilitated financial literacy classes through EVERFI, Inc., engaging schools throughout Mississippi in Trustmark’s Financial Scholars program in 2022

·

Engaged in collaborative relationships through the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency’s (OCC) Project REACh initiative with minority depository institutions in Houston, TX and Mobile, AL to expand access to credit and capital

2


Provided financial literacy and individual counseling through partnership with Operation HOPE, Inc. in Memphis, TN; program will expand to Montgomery, AL and Jackson, MS in 2021
Dedicated to serving diverse and underserved communities; enhanced product offerings to meet special credit needs of low-to-moderate income individuals and communities

GENERAL INFORMATION

 

Introduction

Trustmark Corporation (Trustmark) is holding its 20212023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the Annual Meeting) on Tuesday, April 27, 2021.25, 2023. This proxy statement is being sent on or about March 15, 2021,2023, in connection with the solicitation by the Board of proxies to be voted at the Annual Meeting and at any adjournment or postponement thereof.

Trustmark is furnishing this proxy statement over the Internet to most shareholders. These shareholders will not receive printed copies of the proxy statement and proxy card, and instead will receive a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials containing instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the Internet. If you received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, please see “Availability of Proxy Materials” on page 4748 for additional information.

Meeting Location, Date and Time

The Annual Meeting will be held in a virtual-only formatat Trustmark’s Corporate Office located at 248 East Capitol Street, Jackson, Mississippi 39201 on Tuesday, April 27, 2021,25, 2023, at 1:00 p.m. CT. DueTo obtain directions to the public health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and so that we may support the health and well-being of our associates, shareholders and the community, the Board has directed that the Annual Meeting be held virtually to allow remote participation by shareholders at the Annual Meeting. To attend the meeting, virtually and to vote and submit questions duringcontact the Annual Meeting, you may visit www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/TRMK2021 and enter the 16-digit control number printed in the box marked by the arrow on your proxy cardSecretary at 1-601-208-5088 or printed on your voting instruction form, notice of internet availability of proxy materials, or email previously received.toll-free at 1-800-844-2000 (extension 5088).

Shareholders Entitled to Vote

Shareholders of record at the close of business on March 1, 2021,2023, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. On the record date, Trustmark had outstanding 63,537,43161,048,516 shares of common stock.

Required Vote

A majority of the shares outstanding and entitled to vote constitutes a quorum to transact business at the Annual Meeting. Each share is entitled to one vote on each proposal.

The required vote for each proposal is as follows:

 

 · 

Directors must receive a majority of the votes cast in order to be elected (that is, the number of shares voted “for” a director must exceed the number of shares voted “against” that director). If a nominee who is an incumbent director is not elected, and no successor is elected, such nominee must tender his or her resignation to the Board. For additional information, please see “Proposal 1: Election of Directors” on page 12.14.

 · 

The advisory vote to approve Trustmark’s executive compensation will be approved if the votes cast in favor of the proposal exceed the votes cast opposing the proposal.

 ·

For the advisory vote on the frequency of advisory votes on executive compensation, the option of every one year, every two years or every three years that receives the highest number of votes cast will be the frequency that is recommended by the shareholders.

·

The amendment and restatement of Trustmark’s articles of incorporation will be approved if the votes cast in favor of the proposal exceed the votes cast opposing the proposal.

· 

The ratification of the selection of Crowe LLP (Crowe) as independent auditor will be approved if the votes cast in favor of the proposal exceed the votes cast opposing the proposal.

While abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as shares present at the meeting for purposes of determining a quorum, they are not otherwise counted and, therefore, will have no effect on the outcome of the election of directors

or any other proposal.

Applicable rules determine whether proposals presented at shareholder meetings are considered routine or non-routine. If a proposal is considered routine, a bank, broker or other holder of record which holds shares for an owner in street name generally may vote on the proposal without receiving voting instructions from the beneficial owner. If a proposal is non-routine, the bank, broker or other holder of record generally may vote on the proposal only if the beneficial owner has provided voting instructions. A “broker non-vote” occurs when a broker or other entity returns a signed proxy card but does not vote shares on a particular proposal because the proposal is not a routine matter and the broker or other entity has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares. The ratification of the selection of Crowe as independent auditor is considered a routine matter, while the other proposals, i.e., the election of directors, and the advisory vote to approve Trustmark’s executive compensation, the advisory vote on the frequency of advisory votes on executive compensation, and the amendment and restatement of Trustmark’s articles of incorporation, are considered non-routine matters.

All valid proxies received by Trustmark will be voted in accordance with the instructions indicated in such proxies. As noted above, if you hold your shares through a bank, broker or other holder of record and you do not give voting instructions, your bank, broker or other record holder of the shares is not permitted to vote your shares on any proposal other than Proposal 3,5, which is the only routine proposal on the agenda. If no instructions are indicated in an otherwise properly executed proxy, it will be voted FOR each director nominee named in Proposal 1, FOR advisory approval of Trustmark’s executive compensation in Proposal 2, for a frequency of every ONE YEAR for the advisory vote on executive compensation in Proposal 3, FOR approval of the amendment and restatement of Trustmark’s articles of incorporation in Proposal 4, FOR ratification of the selection of Crowe as independent auditor in Proposal 35 and on all other matters in accordance with the recommendations of the Board.

3


How to Vote

Shareholders of record can vote at the Annual Meeting or by proxy without attending the Annual Meeting.

To vote by proxy:

 

 (1)

Vote by Internet (instructions are on the Notice of Internet Availability or the proxy card),

(2)

Vote using your smartphone (instructions are on the Notice of Internet Availability or the proxy card),

(3)

Vote at the meeting (instructions are on the Notice of Internet Availability or the proxy card), or

 (2)(4)

If you received a printed copy of this proxy statement, complete the enclosed proxy card and sign, date and return it in the enclosed postage-paid envelope.envelope provided.

If you hold your shares through a bank, broker or other holder of record, your bank, broker or other holder of record will provide you with materials and instructions for voting your shares. If you hold your shares through a bank, broker or other holder of record, and you plan to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting, you should complete the voting instructions form that the bank, broker or other holder of record will provide to you or use the telephone or Internet voting arrangements described on the voting instructions form or other materials that the bank, broker or other holder of record will provide to you.

You will receive multiple Notices of Internet Availability or printed copies of the proxy materials if you hold your shares in different ways (e.g., individually, by joint tenancy, through a trust or custodial account, etc.) or in multiple accounts. Please vote the shares represented by each Notice of Internet Availability or proxy card you receive to ensure that all of your shares are voted.

Revoking Your Proxy

If you are a shareholder of record, you may revoke your proxy at any time before the shares are voted by proxy during the meeting. A shareholder may revoke a proxy by delivering written notice to the Secretary at or prior to the Annual Meeting or by timely delivery to the Secretary of a subsequently dated proxy card or by submitting a later vote by Internet or smartphone (instructions are on the Notice of Internet Availability or the proxy card). In the case of multiple submissions regarding the same shares, the proxy with the latest date will be counted. The address for the Secretary is c/o Trustmark Corporation, Post Office Box 291, Jackson, MS 39205.

If you hold your shares through a bank, broker or other holder of record, your ability to revoke your proxy depends on the voting procedures of the bank, broker or other holder of record. Please follow the directions provided to you by your bank, broker or other holder of record.

Voting on Other Matters

The Board is not aware of any additional matters to be brought before the meeting. If other matters do come before the meeting, the persons named in the accompanying proxy or their substitutes will vote the shares represented by such proxies in accordance with the recommendations of the Board.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

Overview

During 2022, the Board undertook a comprehensive review of its governance structure and processes. As a result of such review, the Board approved a number of structural and procedural changes in order to enhance the Board’s effectiveness in providing oversight and strategic advice to management. The key structural changes involve a re-organization of several Board committees and a re-allocation of responsibilities amongst such committees. These changes took effect on January 1, 2023, and the descriptions of each committee’s responsibilities below reflect the re-organized committee structure as of such date. In addition to the committee changes, the Board has implemented a number of changes to the Board and committee processes designed to expand Board engagement and provide additional focus on value-enhancing and forward-looking activities.

Trustmark’s revised governance structure enables the Board to more effectively and efficiently address key, specific issues such as business growth, human capital, enterprise risk management, and technology, among others. This is accomplished through fivesix standing Board committees and through the effective utilizationuse of the directors’ combined wisdom, and diverse experience and business knowledge.

 

4


The rolepurpose of the Board and its committees is to foster Trustmark’s long-term success consistent with its fiduciary responsibilities to shareholders. As part of this role,purpose, Trustmark’s Board is responsible for:

·   Providing strategic guidance and oversight

 

·   Ensuring that management’s operations contribute to Trustmark’s financial soundness

  

·   Acting as a resource on strategic issues and in matters of planning and policy-makingpolicymaking

 

·   Promoting social responsibility and ethical business conduct

  

·   Providing insight and guidance on complex business issues and problems in the banking and financial services industries

 

·   Ensuring that an effective system is in place to facilitate the selection, succession planning and compensation of the Chief Executive Officer (CEO)

  

·   Monitoring risks facing Trustmark and providing oversight of Trustmark’s stress testing and other risk evaluation processes

 

·   Ensuring Trustmark’s compliance with all relevant legal and regulatory requirements

Recent Developments

On January 1, 2021, Gerard R. Host became Executive Chairman of Trustmark and Trustmark National Bank (the Bank), and Duane A. Dewey succeeded Mr. Host as President and CEO of Trustmark and CEO of the Bank and continued as President of the Bank. Richard H. Puckett remains as Chairman of the Executive and Nominating Committees and Lead Director of the Board and the Board of Directors of the Bank (the Bank Board). On March 1, 2021, Louis E. Greer retired as Treasurer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of Trustmark and Chief Financial Officer (CFO) of the Bank. Following Mr. Greer’s retirement, Thomas C. Owens succeeded Mr. Greer as Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer of Trustmark and CFO of the Bank. In addition, on March 1, 2021, George T. (Tom) Chambers, Jr. succeeded Mr. Greer as Principal Accounting Officer of Trustmark and became Chief Accounting Officer of the Bank, and Maria L. Sugay succeeded Mr. Owens as Bank Treasurer.

Key Features of Trustmark’s Corporate Governance

Trustmark’s governance structure has a number of key features that are designed to ensure effective and efficient oversight of the company, including the following:

 

 · 

NineEight members of the Board are independent.

 

Directors are required to retire at the age of 70.

· 

Directors are subject to Trustmark stock ownership requirements, as described under the heading “Director Compensation.”

 · 

The Board has adopted, and annually reviews, formal charters for the Board and its committees to address the governance guidelines and responsibilities of each.

 · 

Trustmark’s bylaws and Board Charter provide that when the Board ChairmanChair is also the CEO, or otherwise is not independent, as is the case currently, the ChairmanChair of the Executive Committee and Nominating & Governance Committee, who shall be an independent director, shall serveserves as Lead Director. See “Board Leadership” on page 6 for additional information.

 · 

Directors must notify Trustmark of changes in professional responsibilities and residence and are expected to comply with a directors’ attendance policy.

 · 

The Board has adopted codes of conduct/ethics for directors, senior financial officers and associates.

 · 

The Board has the authority to seek advice or counsel from external advisors as needed.

 · 

Trustmark has a CEO succession planning process to promote continuity of leadership and an orderly transition upon the CEO’s retirement or other termination of employment.

 ·

Directors are required to retire at the age of 75.

· 

Independent directors meet without management present.

 · 

TheIn 2022, the Executive Committee of the Board reviewsreviewed the corporate governance structure and annually evaluatesevaluated each director’s performance against specific performance criteria designed to evaluate the director’s contributions to the Board’s deliberations and processes. As of January 1, 2023, these responsibilities are performed by the Nominating & Governance Committee.

The Code of Conduct for Trustmark Directors, Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers of Trustmark, Code of Ethics and Procedure to Report Violations of Law or Accounting or Audit Irregularities (Whistleblower Procedures) are available at investorrelations.trustmark.com or may be obtained, without charge, by written request addressed to the Secretary, Trustmark Corporation, Post Office Box 291, Jackson, MS 39205. Trustmark intends to provide required disclosure of any amendment to or waiver of its codes of conduct/ethics that applies to the principalchief executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, at investorrelations.trustmark.com promptly following any such amendment or waiver. Trustmark may also elect to disclose any such amendment or waiver in a report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The information contained on or connected to Trustmark’s website is not incorporated by reference in this proxy statement and should not be considered part of this or any other document that Trustmark files with the SEC.

Meetings of the Board of Directors

The Board met eight10 times in 2020.2022. Each director attended at least 75%90% of the total number of meetings of the Board and Board committees of which the director was a member in 2020.2022. The Board meets jointly with the Board of Directors of Trustmark National Bank Board,(the Bank Board), and since 2017, all members of the Board have also served as members of the Bank Board.

5


Director Attendance at the Annual Meeting

Directors are expected to attend the annual meeting of shareholders,Annual Meeting, and in 2020,2022, all of our directorsDirectors were present at the annual meeting.meeting of shareholders.

Director Independence

The Board has determined that the following current directors and director nominees are “independent directors” (within the meaning of Rule 5605(a)(2) of the Nasdaq Listing Rules):

 

Adolphus B. Baker

 Adolphus B. Baker 

Tracy T. Conerly

 

Harris V. Morrissette

William A. Brown

Marcelo Eduardo

Richard H. Puckett

Augustus L. Collins

J. Clay Hays, Jr., M.D.

 
William A. BrownToni D. CooleyHarris V. Morrissette
Augustus L. CollinsMarcelo EduardoRichard H. Puckett 

The Board also determined in 2022 that former Director Toni D. Cooley, who retired from the Board in April 2022, was an “independent director.”

In conjunction with these independence determinations, the Board considered certain relationships, including through family members and business affiliates, that (i) Messrs. Brown and Puckett, General Collins, Dr. Hays, and Mrs. Conerly have, and Ms. Cooley havehad, as customers of the Bank’s subsidiary, Fisher Brown Bottrell Insurance, Inc. (Fisher Brown Bottrell), a subsidiary of Trustmark National Bank (the Bank), and (ii) Messrs. Baker, Brown, Eduardo and Puckett, General Collins and Dr. Hays have as customers of the wealth management and trust services division of the Bank. The Board also noted that a number of directors, including through business affiliates, have customer relationships with the Bank in the form of routine deposit, credit card and/or loan products in the ordinary course. In each case, the Board concluded that the business relationship did not interfere with the individual’s ability to exercise independent judgment as a director of Trustmark.

Board Leadership

Under Trustmark’s governance guidelines, which are contained in the Board Charter, the Board has the responsibility to determine the most appropriate leadership structure for the company, including whether it is best for the company at a given point in time for the roles of Board ChairmanChair and CEO to be separate or combined.

Trustmark maintained separate Board Chairman and CEO positions from 2011 until 2020. Following the retirement of the prior Board Chairman at the 2020 annual meeting of shareholders, Trustmark combined the roles of Board Chairman and CEO in order to facilitate a smooth and seamless transition of both Board and executive leadership, consistent with Trustmark’s ongoing succession process. Mr. Host served as Board Chairman and CEO through December 31, 2020. During this period of transition, the Board determined that Trustmark would benefit from Mr. Host occupying both roles while leading the Board in its oversight function and consideration of broader corporate strategy. On January 1, 2021, Mr. Dewey succeeded Mr. Host as CEO of Trustmark and the Bank withon January 1, 2021, at which time Mr. Host becomingbecame Executive Chairman of Trustmark and the Bank. In his role as Executive Chairman, Mr. Host focusesfocused on issues involving board governance, corporate strategy, corporate development, investor relations, industry engagement and civic leadership. The Board believesFollowing the 2022 annual meeting of shareholders, Mr. Host’s long tenure provides him with valuable insights regarding Trustmark’s business, which enable him to offer strategic advice and guidance in his roleHost ceased serving as Executive Chairman.Chairman, and became Board Chair.

Trustmark’s Board Charter and Bylaws provide that if the Board ChairmanChair and CEO positions are occupied by the same individual or if the Board ChairmanChair is otherwise not independent, anthe Board’s Lead Director, who is independent, director shall serve as ChairmanChair of the Executive Committee and Nominating & Governance Committee. Mr. Host is not considered to be independent due to his prior tenures as well as the Board’s Lead Director. Accordingly,CEO and Executive Chairman. Mr. Puckett has served as the ChairmanChair of the Executive Committee, Nominating Committee, and as of 2023, the Nominating & Governance Committee, and Lead Director since the 2020 annual meeting of shareholders. The Lead Director’s responsibilities include (i) chairing meetings and executive sessions of the independent directors, Executive Committee, Nominating & Governance Committee and meetings on matters for which the Board ChairmanChair recuses himself and other meetings in the Board Chairman’sChair’s absence, (ii) coordinating with the Board ChairmanChair to develop Board meeting agendas and schedules, (iii) communicating with and advising the Board Chairman,Chair, (iv) referring to the appropriate Board committee any issue brought to his attention by shareholders, directors or others, (v) serving as the primary communicator between the independent directors and the CEO and (vi) providing an alternative communication channel for all directors, including non-executivedirectors. The Board believes an independent Lead Director serves an important function in providing independent leadership of the Board and strengthening the Board’s oversight of Trustmark’s business. The Board Charter is posted at investorrelations.trustmark.com.

Committees of the Board of Directors

ThereAs of January 1, 2023, there are fivesix standing Board committees: Audit, & Finance, Enterprise Risk, Executive, Finance, Human Resources and Nominating. AllNominating & Governance. Each of these Board committees other than the Nominating Committee, are joint committees of the Board and the Bank Board. The Audit, & Finance,Enterprise Risk, Human Resources and Nominating & Governance committees are comprised solely of independent directors and otherwise satisfy the requirements applicable to such committees under Nasdaq listing standards.

Audit & Finance Committee

The Audit & Finance Committee meets regularly throughout the year, including meeting with the external and internal auditors without management present. The Committee’s responsibilities include:

 

 · 

Sole responsibility for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of the external auditor.

 · 

Assuring the objectivity and independence of the internal audit department and the external auditor.

 · 

Reviewing and concurring in the appointment, replacement, reassignment, performance or dismissal of the director of internal audit,Chief Audit Executive, who reports directly to the Committee.

 · 

Inquiring of management, the director of internal audit,Chief Audit Executive, and the external auditor about significant risks or exposures related to the consolidated financial statements and assessing steps that management has taken to minimize such risks to Trustmark.

6


 · 

Considering and reviewing with the director of internal auditChief Audit Executive and the external auditor the adequacy of Trustmark’s internal controls.

 · 

General oversight of the preparation and review of Trustmark’s consolidated financial statements, management’s discussion and analysis, critical accounting policies, interim financial statements, and other matters relating to financial reporting.

 

Reviewing Trustmark’s annual budget and monitoring its performance.

· 

Oversight and review of the system for monitoring compliance with laws and regulations.

The rolepurpose and responsibilities of the Audit &Committee are described in greater detail in its Charter, which is posted at investorrelations.trustmark.com.

Enterprise Risk Committee

The Enterprise Risk Committee is responsible for ensuring that Trustmark has policies and processes to identify and manage various risks throughout the company. The Committee’s responsibilities include:

·

Reviewing and approving Trustmark’s policies regarding enterprise risk management.

·

Understanding and analyzing the enterprise-wide effect of the risks Trustmark faces.

·

Recommending to the Board a formal risk appetite statement for all risk categories.

·

Reviewing and approving enterprise risk assessments in various risk categories, as prepared by management.

·

Reviewing Trustmark’s capital stress testing results as they relate to risk.

·

Reviewing and approving the vendor risk management policy and program.

·

Reviewing and approving Trustmark’s cybersecurity strategy to protect its information assets and technology platforms.

·

Monitoring all aspects of the quality of the Bank’s loan portfolio including the risk profile of the portfolio, and reviewing and approving the Bank’s policies regarding loan quality.

·

Monitoring activities of the Bank’s Wealth Management Group, which includes the fiduciary activities of the Bank’s Trust Department.

The purpose and responsibilities of the Enterprise Risk Committee are described in greater detail in its Charter, which is posted at investorrelations.trustmark.com.

Executive Committee

The Executive Committee acts on behalf of the Board if a matter requires Board action between regularly scheduled Board meetings. It also evaluates and makes recommendations to the Board regarding material corporate transactions, and approves unplanned expenditures greater than $1 million if the Finance Committee is unable to meet. The Executive Committee Charter is posted at investorrelations.trustmark.com.

Finance Committee

The Finance Committee is responsible for overseeing Trustmark’s budgeting, capital planning and related financial strategy. The Committee’s responsibilities include:

·

Reviewing and recommending for Board approval Trustmark’s annual budget, and monitoring performance against budget.

·

Providing guidance to management regarding Trustmark’s strategic plan and financial goal setting.

·

Reviewing and approving unplanned expenditures greater than $1 million.

·

Reviewing and recommending to the Board actions pertaining to Trustmark’s capital position, including issuance and repurchases of stock and payment of dividends.

·

Reviewing and approving Trustmark’s capital stress testing policy and results of capital stress testing.

·

Reviewing and approving the Bank’s funds management policy, and periodically monitoring the Bank’s investment securities portfolio.

·

Reviewing and approving liquidity risk parameters and guidelines established by management and periodically monitoring the Bank’s liquidity risk profile.

The purpose and responsibilities of the Finance Committee are described in greater detail in its Charter, which is posted at investorrelations.trustmark.com.

Enterprise Risk Committee

The Enterprise Risk Committee is responsible for monitoring risks that are being taken by Trustmark. The Committee’s responsibilities include:

Understanding and analyzing the enterprise-wide effect of those risks.

Reporting on risks to the Board.

Monitoring capital stress testing results and comparison to risk appetite and other risk evaluation processes.

Receiving reports from other committees of the Board and Bank Board about risks that are under the committees’ specific purview.

Executive Committee

The Executive Committee acts on behalf of the Board if a matter requires Board action before a meeting of the Board can be held. The Committee’s responsibilities include:

Providing guidance to management on the strategic planning process and issues of strategic importance, including business growth and expansion, material transactions and technology.

Oversight of Trustmark’s capital planning process.

Oversight of Trustmark’s capital stress testing activities.

Reviewing the corporate governance structure.

Evaluating, annually, each director’s performance against specific performance criteria designed to evaluate the director’s contributions to the Board’s deliberations and processes.

Reviewing Trustmark’s cybersecurity activities and corporate technology strategy.

Human Resources Committee

The Human Resources Committee is responsible for overseeing the development of a program to compensate Trustmark’s management in accordance with Trustmark’s compensation philosophy and objectives. The Committee also ensures that appropriate policies and practices are in place to facilitate the development of associate and management talent and orderly CEO succession. In fulfilling its role, the Committee’s responsibilities include:

 

 · 

Approving management-developed guidelines that shape Trustmark’s compensation strategy and approach.

 

Recommending the skills and experience required of a CEO candidate, subject to final approval by the Board.

· 

Recommending the CEO’s compensation and performance evaluation procedures, for final approval by the Board.

 ·

Recommending the CEO succession planning process, subject to approval by the Board.

7


·

Recommending, for approval by the Bank Board and the Board, as applicable, the appointment or promotion of officers who are members (or proposed members) of the Executive Strategy Committee.

· 

Recommending compensation for officers who are members of the Executive Strategy Committee, and officers of Trustmark, for final approval by the Bank Board and the Board, as applicable.

 · 

Recommending awards under Trustmark’s equity compensation plans, for final approval by the Board, subject to limited discretion by the CEO for specified awards.

 · 

Recommending compensation for directors.directors, for approval by the Board.

 · 

Reviewing and approving Trustmark’s compensation disclosures.

 · 

Overseeing the review ofReviewing and approving Trustmark’s compensation policies and practices as they relate to risk management.

·

Reviewing and recommending for the Board’s approval Trustmark’s policies and practices regarding human resources-related social responsibility issues, including equal opportunity employment, diversity and inclusion.

All members of the Committee during 20202022 were and currently are “non-employee directors” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act), “outside directors” within the meaning of

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and “independent directors” within the meaning of Rule 5605(a)(2) of the Nasdaq listing rules. The purpose and responsibilities of the Human Resources Committee are described in greater detail in its Charter, which is posted at investorrelations.trustmark.com.

Nominating & Governance Committee

The purpose of the Nominating & Governance Committee is charged with assistingto assist the Board by identifyingin recommending qualified individuals qualifiedfor election or re-election to becomethe Board members.and for assignment to Board committees, and to provide guidance on Board and corporate governance issues. The Committee also evaluates the annual performance of the Board and its committees. In fulfilling its role, the Committee’s responsibilities include:

 

 ·

Reviewing and recommending for approval by the Board Trustmark’s corporate governance structure and practices to ensure sound, effective and efficient operation of the Board.

· 

Seeking, interviewing, and recommending qualified individuals for Board service.

 · 

Identifying and recommending qualified individuals for membership on committees of the Board.

 · 

Providing periodic presentations to Trustmark’s Board.Reviewing and approving appropriate support for director onboarding and training.

·

Reviewing and recommending for Board approval director performance standards, and evaluating, annually, each director’s performance against such performance standards.

The purpose and responsibilities of the Nominating & Governance Committee are described in greater detail in its Charter, which is posted at investorrelations.trustmark.com.

Board Oversight of Risk Management

Trustmark believes that its governance and leadership structures allow the Board to provide effective risk oversight. In addition to the reports from the Enterprise Risk Committee, Trustmark’s directors receive and discuss regular reports prepared by Trustmark’s senior management, including the CFO, Chief Credit and theOperations Officer, Chief Administrative Officer, Chief Risk Officer.Officer and Chief Audit Executive. Through these reports, Trustmark’s directors receive information on areas of material riskrisks to the company, including credit, liquidity, market/interest rate, compliance, operational, technology, strategic, financial and reputational risks. These reports enable Trustmark’s directors to understand the risk identification, risk management and risk mitigation strategies employed by Trustmark’s management and the Enterprise Risk Committee. Since the first quarter of 2020, Trustmark’s directors have been receiving regular updates and reports from Trustmark’s senior management regarding various risks associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, including credit, liquidity, market/interest rate, and operational risk.

The Board and the Enterprise Risk Committee will request supplemental reports from Trustmark’s management with regard to risk management and risk mitigation strategies as appropriate. This reporting and governance structure ensures that information from the Enterprise Risk Committee, the other committees of the Board and the Bank Board, and management is analyzed and reported to the Board, and enables the Board and its committees to coordinate the risk oversight role, particularly with respect to risk interrelationships.

As part of its overall oversight of risk management, theThe Board provides oversight of management’s efforts to address cybersecurity risk by receiving periodic reports at meetings of the Enterprise Risk Committee Audit & Finance Committee and ExecutiveAudit Committee, as well as presentations at the Board level. These reports to the Board and its Committees address the threat environment, vulnerability assessments, specific cyber incidents and management’s efforts to monitor, detect and prevent cyber threats.

8


Committee Membership

The following table shows, for 2020,2022, the membership of each committee and the number of meetings held by each committee during the year:

 

  Director     Audit & Finance         Enterprise Risk             Executive                 Human Resources                 Nominating        

Adolphus B. Baker

   X Chair X

William A. Brown

 X X   

Augustus L. Collins (1)

 X X   

James N. Compton (2)

 X X   

Tracy T. Conerly

 Chair  X  X

Toni D. Cooley

  Chair X  X

Marcelo Eduardo (3)

 X    

J. Clay Hays Jr., M.D.(4)

  X  X 

Gerard R. Host

   X  

Harris V. Morrissette

 X   X 

Richard H. Puckett (5)

   Chairman/Lead Director X Chair

R. Michael Summerford (6)

   X X X

Harry M. Walker

   X  

LeRoy G. Walker, Jr. (7)

 X    

William G. Yates III

   X      

2020 Meetings

 5 4 6 6 3
   Director  Audit & Finance  Enterprise Risk  Executive  Human Resources            Nominating        

Adolphus B. Baker

      X  Chair  X

William A. Brown

  X  X  X    X

Augustus L. Collins

  X  X      

Tracy T. Conerly

  Chair    X    X

Toni D. Cooley (1)

    X      

Duane A. Dewey

      X    

Marcelo Eduardo

  X    X    X

J. Clay Hays Jr., M.D.

    Chair  X  X  X

Gerard R. Host

      X    

Harris V. Morrissette

  X      X  

Richard H. Puckett

      Chair/Lead Director  X  Chair

William G. Yates III

          

2022 Meetings

  7  4  6  5  2

 (1)

General Collins has served on the Audit & Finance Committee and Enterprise Risk Committee since April 28, 2020.

(2)

Mr. ComptonMs. Cooley retired from the Board on April 28, 2020. Prior to his retirement, he served as a member26, 2022.

As of January 1, 2023, the Committee structure and membership is as follows:

   Director    Audit    & Finance Committee and    Enterprise Risk    Committee.

  (3)    Executive    

Mr. Eduardo has served on the Audit & Finance Committee since April 28, 2020.

  (4)    Finance    

Dr. Hays has served on the Human Resources Committee since April 28, 2020.

  (5)Human
    Resources    

Mr. Puckett has served as Lead Director of the Board, Chairman of the Executive Committee and Chair of the Nominating Committee since April 28, 2020.

  (6)          Nominating &          
Governance

Mr. Summerford retired from the Board on April 28, 2020. Prior to his retirement, he served as Chairman of the Board, Chairman of the Executive Committee, Chair of the Nominating Committee and as a member of the Human Resources Committee.Adolphus B. Baker

  (7)ChairX

Mr.William A. Brown

XX

Augustus L. Walker retired from the Board on April 28, 2020. Prior to his retirement, he served as a member of the Audit & Finance Committee.Collins

XXX

Tracy T. Conerly

ChairXX

Duane A. Dewey

X

Marcelo Eduardo

XXChairX

J. Clay Hays, Jr., M.D.

ChairXX

Gerard R. Host

X

Harris V. Morrissette

XXX

Richard H. Puckett

Chair/Lead DirectorXChair/Lead Director

William G. Yates III

X

Communications with Directors

Shareholders desiring to contact Trustmark’s Board may do so by sending written correspondence to Board of Directors, Trustmark Corporation, Post Office Box 291, Jackson, MS 39205 or by email addressed to boardofdirectors@trustmark.com. Communications will be referred to the ChairmanChair of the Executive Committee, who will determine the appropriate committee to receive the communication and take any action deemed necessary by that committee.

Pursuant to Trustmark’s Whistleblower Procedures, any violations of law or complaints or concerns regarding accounting or auditing matters should be reported to (i) Trustmark’s independent online reporting center at www.reportlineweb.com/trustmark,www.trustmark.ethicspoint.com, (ii) Trustmark’s independent hotline at 1-866-979-3769, or (iii) Trustmark’s Ethics Committee Chair at 601-208-6867. Complaints will be investigated by Trustmark’s General CounselChief Administrative Officer and Director ofChief Audit Executive and reported to the Audit & Finance Committee.

Nomination of Directors

Nominations for election to the Board may be made by or on behalf of the Board or by any shareholder of any outstanding class of capital stock of Trustmark entitled to vote in the election of directors at an annual meeting.

Nominations other than those made by or on behalf of the Board must be made in accordance with procedures set forth in Trustmark’s bylaws. These procedures require that such nominations be in writing and that they be delivered or mailed to Trustmark’s ChairmanChair of the Board and received (a) not less than 60 days nor more than 90 days prior to the first anniversary of the mailing date of Trustmark’s proxy statement in connection with the last annual meeting of shareholders, or (b) if no annual meeting was held in the prior year or the date of the annual meeting has been changed by more than 30 days from the date of the prior year’s annual meeting, not less than 90 days before the date of the annual meeting. The bylaws also require that such notification contain the following information to the extent known to the notifying shareholder: (a) the name and address of each proposed nominee, (b) the principal occupation of each proposed nominee, (c) the total number of shares of capital stock of Trustmark that will be voted for each proposed nominee, (d) the name and residence address of the notifying shareholder, (e) the number of shares of capital stock of Trustmark owned by the notifying shareholder, (f) such other information regarding such proposed nominee as would be required to be included in a proxy statement filed pursuant to the proxy rules of the SEC had the proposed nominee been nominated by the Board, (g) a representation that the notifying shareholder is the owner of shares entitled

9


to vote at the meeting and intends to appear in person or by proxy at the meeting to nominate the proposed nominee, and (h) the written consent of each proposed nominee to serve as a director of Trustmark if so elected.elected and (i) a representation as to whether the notifying shareholder intends or is part of a group which intends to solicit proxies or votes in support of such director nominees in accordance with Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act. In addition, such notification must include the information required by Rule 14a-19(b) under the Exchange Act if the notifying shareholder intends to solicit proxies or votes in support of director nominees in accordance with Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act.

Nominations not made in accordance with the above bylaw procedureprocedures may be disregarded by the ChairmanChair of the Board of the annual meeting at his discretion, and upon his instruction, all votes cast for each such nominee may be disregarded.

Trustmark’s bylaws permit direct nominations by shareholders. Therefore, the Nominating & Governance Committee does not have a policy for considering nominations by shareholders other than through the bylaw process outlined above. However, if a shareholder wishes to recommend an individual for Board service, rather than directly nominate the individual as set forth above, the shareholder may submit the individual’s name to the Nominating & Governance Committee by email to boardofdirectors@trustmark.com, or in writing addressed to Trustmark Corporation Nominating & Governance Committee, Post Office Box 291, Jackson, MS 39205 or by email to boardofdirectors@trustmark.com.39205. In order to give the Nominating & Governance Committee adequate time to consider any such individual for nomination as a director at the 20222024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, such recommendations should be delivered no later than October 1, 2021.2023. In considering an individual recommended by a shareholder but not directly nominated, the Nominating & Governance Committee will use the same guidelines as set forth in the Director Qualifications section below.

When identifying potential candidates for director nominees, the Nominating & Governance Committee may solicit suggestions from incumbent directors, management or others.

Environmental, Social and Governance/Corporate Social Responsibility (ESG/CSR)

Trustmark believes that a company’s commitment to corporate social responsibility is committedmeasured by its sustainability, environmental, and societal impact. These factors are critical to fulfillinglong-term business viability. Trustmark understands that a company’s performance must be measured not only by shareholder returns, but also by how it achieves ESG/CSR objectives. The company employs a Director of Corporate Social Responsibility to monitor the continuing effectiveness of its responsibilities to its associates, customers, communities and shareholders. Trustmark believes building strong customer relationships is the result of knowing its customers and supporting its communities.program. Robust community engagement, volunteerism,informed policies and procedures, and responsible philanthropy are some of the ways in which Trustmark continues to serve its communities. Trustmark is also committedcommunities and workforce. Accomplishments in these areas of focus were highlighted in Trustmark’s first annual CSR Impact Report, published in 2022 and available at Trustmark.com.

Board Oversight.The Board has responsibility for overseeing Trustmark’s strategies, policies, and programs relating to ESG/CSR matters, including environmental sustainability, community development and reinvestment, and charitable giving and other programs with social impacts. The Human Resources Committee reviews and approves Trustmark’s policies and practices regarding social responsibility issues relating to human resources, such as equal opportunity employment, diversity and inclusion.

CSR Engagement and Investment.Trustmark’s continued commitment to corporate social inclusion throughout the organizationresponsibility was demonstrated in 2022 through services provided to customers, partnerships formed in communities, and supports practices that encourage environmental sustainability.opportunities presented to associates. The company’s strategically aligned activities reflect its core values of Integrity, Service, Accountability, Relationships and Solutions. In furtherance of these commitments, Trustmark appointed a Director of Corporate Social Responsibility in 2020 to advance its efforts.

In 2020,2022, Trustmark invested $5.3more than $4 million in the form of contributions and sponsorships to local organizations, including a $1.5 million giventax credit investment allocated to 13 Mississippi youth and family-based charities providing services and programs for the welfare and development of children as part of Trustmark’s commitment under the Mississippi Children’s Promise

Act. In response to community needs that surfaced because of the COVID-19 pandemic, Trustmark contributed more than $400,000 to support local food pantries throughout its service areas. Additional contributions included funds for school supplies and computer headsets to support virtual learning.

Trustmark continued to focus on financial literacy partneringand community outreach in 2022, with associates volunteering more than 6,519 hours of service to local partners through positions on non-profit boards of directors, financial literacy outreach and other forms of community engagement. The company also continued to partner with EVERFI, Inc., to provide online financial literacy courses in approximately 100 schools educating 9,500throughout Mississippi to educate students on financial matters through Trustmark’s Financial Scholars Program. During the year, Trustmark expanded its relationship withThe EVERFI to utilize the Engage platform which will allowwas also made available to Trustmark associates to conduct community-based financial literacy sessions, both in-person and virtually.

Trustmark also partneredAdditional financial literacy support was provided through Trustmark’s continued partnership with Operation HOPE, Inc., a national non-profit organization. Trustmark continued to engage with the organization in 2022 to implement the HOPE Inside program within the markets of Memphis, Tennessee; Montgomery, Alabama; and Jackson, Mississippi to provide financial literacybanking customers and counseling support to individuals withinmembers of the Memphis, Tennessee market. This partnership, called HOPE Inside, provides over 5,000 City of Memphis employeespublic with opportunities to receive financial tools and education to strengthen their financial security. Trustmark committedTrustmark’s investment of $200,000 in each of these markets provides a two-year commitment to the two-year partnership, providingsupport a dedicated financial wellness coach to administer the HOPE Inside program. The coaches conduct financial literacy seminars, individualized financial counseling sessions and provide referrals to disaster relief services. These services and resources are provided at no cost to community residents, and extend to city employees and first responders in each of the designated markets. In 2020,2022, more than 1,2003,320 services were provided through this partnership. In recognition of the anticipated long-term impact of the program, Trustmark developed plans to replicate theTrustmark’s partnership with Operation HOPEHOPE.

Trustmark values partnerships that serve diverse communities, and city governmentsit embraces opportunities to engage in that work. In 2022, Trustmark participated in collaborative partnerships with two minority depository institutions (MDIs), through the Project Roundtable for Economic Access and Change (REACh) Initiative, developed by the OCC. Project REACh aims to identify and reduce barriers to full, fair participation in the Montgomery,nation’s banking system and the economy to help expand access to credit and capital.

10


Trustmark announced its partnership under the program with newly formed Agility Bank in early 2022. Agility Bank, based in Houston, Texas, is the first primarily women-owned and led bank in the United States under the MDI national charter of the OCC. Trustmark entered a second year of collaboration in 2022 with Commonwealth National Bank, which has served the Mobile, Alabama and Jackson, Mississippi marketsbanking community since 1976. Commonwealth National Bank is one of fewer than 25 black-owned banks remaining in 2021.the United States.

Trustmark’s commitment to building and supporting resilient communities also includes revitalizing and strengthening underserved communities. ItsIn 2022, its investments in low-to-moderate income areas included more than $211$347 million in home mortgage loans, and $139$542 million in small business loans and small farm loans in 2020 and approximately $85more than $172 million in community development loans. Also in 2020,2022, Trustmark provided low-to-moderate income borrowers more than $436$510 million in home mortgage loans. The company’s collaborative work with community service providers, developers, realtors, housing advocates and others resulted in more than $16$34.5 million in investments that provide affordable housing, employment and community services for those with low-to-moderate incomes. Trustmark also enhanced its mortgage product offerings during the year to meet the special credit needs of low-to-moderate income individuals and communities. Trustmark employs a dedicated team of associates to provide oversight of initiatives that advance financial growth and stability within racially and economically diverse communities. The Diverse Market Strategy Team coordinates with business units at Trustmark to develop innovative lending strategies, inclusive outreach events, targeted marketing campaigns, and special purpose products and programs to meet the unique needs of diverse communities throughout the company’s footprint.

During 2020,Human Capital and Workforce Diversity.Trustmark’s commitment to serve diverse communities extends to its workforce practices. Trustmark’s Diversity Officer works within the Human Resources Department to develop and oversee diverse training, recruitment and retention practices. The company has introduced several initiatives to support a workforce culture of diversity through educational diversity training for management and all associates, including the development of a training course that emphasizes management’s role in hiring a diverse and inclusive workforce. Three HR associates hold a Diversity, Equity and Inclusion certificate from the University of South Florida’s Muma College of Business and, in 2022, represented Trustmark in the American Bankers Association’s Black Bankers Employee Resource Group. Trustmark also continues to socialize cultural observances through a community calendar of events to promote a culture of inclusivity and engagement among associates. Additionally, in 2022, Trustmark launched its second cycle of the Emerging Talent Program, designed to identify and develop high-performing associates through management mentorship.

Environmental Sustainability.Throughout the year, Trustmark promoted environmental sustainability withthrough business practices that conserve natural resources, including the sponsorship of numerous community shredding events to encourage recycling initiatives. Trustmark also provides shredding services at all buildings and branch locations, offers enhanced digital banking options and processes for customers, and utilizes internal workflow management systems to reduce paper usage. Additionally, an LED light conversion project was continued across the organization in 2022 to increase energy efficiency.efficiency, in which 15 additional Trustmark buildings were retrofitted with LED lighting. Programmable thermostats and HVAC control systems installed in Trustmark buildings to conserve and monitor energy use have resulted in usage declines between 25-40 percent. Trustmark’s proactive environmental business practices were matched with its responsiveness to weather-induced events in 2022 through the activation of comprehensive disaster recovery and business continuity plans. The plans detail the responsibilities of key positions, instructions on ways to continue operations throughout the progression of weather-related events, and timeframes by which key tasks must be accomplished. Trustmark is committed to assessing environmental risks to its operations, including those associated with increasing climate change concerns.

Collectively, these efforts reflect Trustmark’s core values of Integrity, Service, Accountability, Relationships and Solutions and its commitment to strengthen the communities it serves.

Director Qualifications

The Board believes that in order to appropriately carry out its roles, directors must demonstrate a variety of personal traits, leadership qualities and individual competencies. In considering nominees submitted by the Board or management and any recommendations submitted by shareholders, the Nominating & Governance Committee will use these personal traits, leadership qualities and individual competencies to assess future director nominees’ suitability for Board service. The Nominating & Governance Committee also evaluates each director nominee’s qualities in the context of how that nominee would relate to the Board as a whole, in light of the Board’s current composition and Trustmark’s evolving needs.

Although Trustmark has no formal policy regarding diversity, the Nominating & Governance Committee believes that the Board should include directors with diverse skills, experience and business knowledge, and whose backgrounds, ages, geographical representation and community involvement contribute to an overall diversity of perspective that enhances the quality of the Board’s deliberations and decisions. The Nominating & Governance Committee may consider these factors as it deems appropriate in connection with the general qualifications of each director nominee.

Personal Traits

Board service is an extremely important, high profilehigh-profile role and carries with it significant responsibility. For that reason, it is important that all directors possess a certain set of personal traits, including:

 

·   Personal and Professional Integrity

●   High Performance Standards

·   Accountability

  

·   High Performance Standards

·   Initiative/Responsiveness

·   Informed Business Judgment

  

·   Business Credibility

·   Mature Confidence

11


Leadership Qualities

For individuals considered for Board leadership roles, the following skill sets are required:

 

·   Communication Skills

 

·   Facilitation Skills

·   Crisis Management Skills

 

·   Relationship Building/Networking Skills

Individual Competencies

There are certain competencies that must be represented collectively by the directors on each Board committee, but each individual director need not necessarily possess all of them. The specific competencies vary by committee, as illustrated in the chart below:

 

Individual Director Competencies

Board Committees

 

    Audit &    

Finance

 

    Enterprise    

Risk

Board Committees
  
Individual Director Competencies        Audit            Enterprise    
Risk
Executive        Finance     

Human

    Resources    

 

    Nominating    

&

Governance

1. Financial Acumen

     

Accounting and finance knowledge

     
     

Financial statement analysis

     
    

Knowledge of capital markets

Financial planning

 

Ability to communicate financial concepts in lay terms

    
   

Knowledge of capital markets

Financial planning

2. Organizational Effectiveness

     

Talent management

     
     

Understanding of compensation issues

     
     

Ability to discern candidate qualifications

     

3. Strategic Direction

     

Vision

     
     

Strategic perspective

     
     

Technology knowledge

     
     

Industry knowledge

     

4. Risk Management Experience

     

Experience managing risk exposures

     

Specific Director Experience, Qualifications, Attributes and Skills

The Board believes that each person nominated for election at the Annual Meeting possesses the personal traits described above and that each director nominee who has served in a position of Board leadership also demonstrates the additional leadership qualities described above. In considering the director nominees’ individual competencies, the Board believes that the appropriate competencies are represented for the Board as a whole and for each of the Board’s committees. In addition, each nominee possesses characteristics that led the Board to conclude that such person should serve as a director. The specific experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that the Board believes each nominee possesses are discussed under Proposal 1 in the table entitled “The Nominees,” beginning on page 12.14.

12


Board Diversity

The chart below provides information regarding the diversity characteristics of the members our Board, based on self-identification by the directors.

 
Board Diversity Matrix (As of December 31, 2022)
  

Total Number of Directors

  11
     
   Female  Male  Non-Binary  Did Not Disclose Gender
 

Part I: Gender Identity

     

Directors

  1  10  -  -
 

Part II: Demographic Background

     

African American or Black

  -  1  -  -
     

Alaskan Native or Native American

  -  -  -  -
     

Asian

  -  -  -  -
     

Hispanic or Latinx

  -  1  -  -
     

Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander

  -  -  -  -
     

White

  1  8  -  -
     

Two or More Races or Ethnicities

  -  -  -  -
  

LGBTQ+

  -
  

Did Not Disclose Demographic Background

  -

13


PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

The Board has fixed the number of directors for the coming year at 12. 11.

The nominees listed herein have been proposed by the Board for election at the Annual Meeting. Mr. Walker will retire at the Annual Meeting. Shares represented by valid proxies will, unless authority to vote is withheld, be voted in favor of the proposed slate of 1211 nominees. Directors must receive a majority of the votes cast in order to be elected (that is, the number of shares voted “for” a director must exceed the number of shares voted “against” that director). If a nominee who is an incumbent director is not elected to the Board, and no successor is elected, such nominee must tender his or her resignation to the Board. The Nominating & Governance Committee will then make a recommendation to the Board on whether to accept or reject the resignation or whether to take other action. The director who tenders his or her resignation may not participate in the recommendation of the Nominating & Governance Committee or the decision of the Board with respect to his or her resignation. Each director is elected to hold office until the next annual meeting of shareholders or until a successor is elected and qualified.

The Board recommends that shareholders vote “for”“FOR” the proposed nominees.

The Nominees

 

 

 

LOGOLOGO 

 

Adolphus B. Baker, 6466

Director of Trustmark since 2007

(Independent Director)Director)

 

Trustmark Corporation Committees:

●   Executive

·   Human Resources (Chair)

·   Nominating & Governance

 

 

Career Highlights:

·   Chairman, and CEO, Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.

(Producer and Distributor of Shell Eggs)

 

Other Public Company Boards:

·   Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.

Experience and qualifications: Mr. Baker is chairman and former chief executive officer of a publicly-traded company that is the largest producer and distributor of shell eggs in the United States. His position has provided him with significant business leadership skills and experience in evaluating strategic alternatives that focus on maximizing shareholder value. Mr. Baker’s years of service as a director of the Bank, and particularly as the former chair of the Bank Board’s Asset/Liability Committee (the responsibilities of which are now performed by the Finance Committee), provide him with an intrinsic understanding of Trustmark’s strategy for managing liquidity, which is a skill essential to the Board’s risk oversight function. He is a member of the National Association of Corporate Directors.

Experience and qualifications: Mr. Baker is chairman and chief executive officer of a publicly-traded company that is the largest producer and distributor of shell eggs in the United States. His position has provided him with significant business leadership skills and experience in evaluating strategic alternatives that focus on maximizing shareholder value. Mr. Baker’s years of service as a director of the Bank, and particularly as the former chairman of the Bank Board’s Asset/Liability Committee, provide him with an intrinsic understanding of Trustmark’s strategy for managing liquidity, which is a skill essential to the Board’s risk oversight function.

LOGO

         William A. Brown, 63

         Director of Trustmark since 2017

         (Independent Director)

         Trustmark Corporation Committees:

●   Audit & Finance

●   Enterprise Risk

Career Highlights:

●   President and CEO, Brown Bottling Group, Inc.

(Beverage Distributor)

Experience and qualifications: Mr. Brown serves as president and chief executive officer of a regional beverage distributor based in Mississippi. He serves on the Boards of the Pepsi Cola Bottlers Association and Wis-Pak/WP Beverages as well as trade associations, including the Mississippi Beverage Association. His extensive experience in this industry has provided him with significant marketing and business leadership skills as well as in-depth understanding of the business climate and customer base in significant Trustmark markets. Mr. Brown has also served on the Bank Board’s Credit Policy Committee, providing him with an understanding of Trustmark’s credit culture and philosophy, which is a skill essential to the Board’s risk oversight function.

 

 

 

LOGOLOGO 

 

   Augustus L. Collins, 63William A. Brown, 65

Director of Trustmark since 20202017

(Independent Director)

 

Trustmark Corporation Committees:

·   Audit

·   Enterprise Risk

 

●   Audit & Finance

●   Enterprise Risk

 

 

Career Highlights:Highlights:

·   Chairman, Brown Group Holdings, Inc.

(Soft Drink Manufacturing)

 

●   CEO, MINACT·   President, Brown Bottling Group, Inc.

(Job Training, Development and Management)

Other Public Company Boards:

●   Huntington Ingalls IndustriesBeverage Distributor)

Experience and qualifications: General Collins has served as the CEO of MINACT Inc., a job training, development and management company, since 2016.

Experience and qualifications: Mr. Brown serves as chairman of a soft drink manufacturing business and president of a regional beverage distributor based in Mississippi. He serves on the Boards of the Pepsi Cola Bottlers Association and Wis-Pak/WP Beverages as well as trade associations, including the Mississippi Beverage Association. His extensive experience in this industry has provided him with significant marketing and business leadership skills as well as in-depth understanding of the business climate and customer base in significant Trustmark markets. Mr. Brown also served as Chair of the Bank Board’s Credit Policy Committee (the responsibilities of which are now performed by the Enterprise Risk Committee), providing him with an understanding of Trustmark’s credit culture and philosophy, which is a skill essential to the Board’s risk oversight function. He retired with the rank of Major General in the Mississippi National Guard, having served as Adjutant General of both the Mississippi Army National Guard and the Mississippi Air National Guard from 2012 to 2016. His 35 years of combined military service in the U.S. Army and the Mississippi National Guard included the command of the 155th Brigade Combat Team in Iraq, where he was responsible for security operations in the southern and western provinces. He was previously appointed by the Governor to the Mississippi Workers’ Compensation Commission where he served as the commission’s representative of labor. General Collins’ years of service and leadership provide him with valuable experience in strategic and financial planning as well as human resources.

LOGO

   Tracy T. Conerly, 56

   Director of Trustmark since 2015

   (Independent Director)

   Trustmark Corporation Committees:

●   Audit & Finance (Chair)

●   Executive

●   Nominating

Career Highlights:

●   Partner Emeritus, Carr, Riggs & Ingram, LLC

(Accounting)

Experience and qualifications: Mrs. Conerly is a certified public accountant and a certified valuation analyst. Her experience as a former partner at a large certified public accounting firm and former director of a publicly traded financial institution, which was acquired by Trustmark in 2013, has provided her with significant financial and accounting expertise, particularly in the areas of auditing, business valuation and tax, and qualifies her for service as one of the Board’s audit committee financial experts. Mrs. Conerly’s years of service as a director of a publicly traded financial institution provide her with valuable experience in financial institution governance and an understanding of markets that are a strategic focus for Trustmark. Mrs. Conerly also serves on the Bank Board’s Asset/Liability Committee, providing her with an understanding of Trustmark’s balance sheet strategy, which is a skill essential to the Board’s risk oversight function. She is a member of the National Association of Corporate Directors.

 

 

14


 

 

LOGOLOGO 

 Toni D. Cooley, 60

Augustus L. Collins, 65

Director of Trustmark since 20132020

(Independent Director)

 

Trustmark Corporation Committees:

·   Audit

·   Enterprise Risk (Chair)

●   Executive

●   Nominating·   Human Resources

 

Career Highlights:

·   CEO, Systems Electro CoatingMINACT Inc.

(Provider of ElectrocoatingJob Training, Development and Related Services to Original Equipment Manufacturers)Management)

 

Other Public Company Boards:

●  Sanderson Farms, Inc.

·   Huntington Ingalls Industries

·   Mississippi Power Company

Experience and qualifications: General Collins has served as the CEO of MINACT Inc., a job training, development and management company, since 2016. He retired with the rank of Major General in the Mississippi National Guard, having served as Adjutant General of both the Mississippi Army National Guard and the Mississippi Air National Guard from 2012 to 2016. His 35 years of combined military service in the U.S. Army and the Mississippi National Guard included the command of the 155th Brigade Combat Team in Iraq, where he was responsible for security operations in the southern and western provinces. He was previously appointed by the Governor to the Mississippi Workers’ Compensation Commission where he served as the commission’s representative of labor. General Collins’ years of service and leadership provide him with valuable experience in strategic and financial planning as well as human resources. He is a member of the National Association of Corporate Directors.

Experience and qualifications: Ms. Cooley is the chief executive officer of the Systems Group of Companies, which includes Systems Electro Coating, a Tier One supplier to Nissan, and Systems Automotive Interiors, a Tier One supplier to Toyota. She holds a Juris Doctor degree and is a director for another publicly-traded company as well as several nonpublic organizations. She was appointed a director of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, New Orleans Branch, in 2019. In addition, Ms. Cooley has served on the Bank Board’s Credit Policy Committee, which has given her a solid understanding of Trustmark’s core business and conservative values. Her leadership experience and business knowledge, with expertise in fields ranging from law to operations and technology, equip Ms. Cooley with the ability to contribute invaluable insight and broad perspective to Board discussions.

 

 

 

LOGO

LOGO

 

 Duane A. Dewey, 62

Tracy T. Conerly, 58

Director of Trustmark since 2015

(Independent Director)

Trustmark Corporation Committees:

·   Audit (Chair)

·   Finance

·   Nominating & Governance

Career Highlights:

·   Retired Partner, Carr, Riggs & Ingram, LLC

(Accounting)

Experience and qualifications: Mrs. Conerly is a certified public accountant and a former certified valuation analyst. Her experience as a former partner at a large certified public accounting firm has provided her with significant financial and accounting expertise, particularly in the areas of auditing, business valuation and tax, and qualifies her for service as one of the Board’s audit committee financial experts. Mrs. Conerly’s years of service as a director of a publicly-traded financial institution provide her with valuable experience in financial institution governance and an understanding of markets that are a strategic focus for Trustmark. Mrs. Conerly also served on the Bank Board’s Asset/Liability Committee (the responsibilities of which are now performed by the Finance Committee), providing her with an understanding of Trustmark’s balance sheet strategy, which is a skill essential to the Board’s risk oversight function. She is a member of the National Association of Corporate Directors.

 

 

 

15


LOGO

Duane A. Dewey, 64

Director of Trustmark since 2020

 

Trustmark Corporation Committees:

·   Executive

 

Career Highlights:

·   President and Chief Executive Officer, Trustmark Corporation

·   President and Chief Executive Officer, Trustmark National Bank

Experience and qualifications: Mr. Dewey became president and chief executive officer of Trustmark and the Bank on January 1, 2021. He was formerly president and chief operating officer of the Bank from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020. He served as chief operating officer of the Bank from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019, and as President of Corporate Banking from 2008 to 2018. Mr. Dewey, with 19 years of experience at Trustmark and 37 years in the financial services industry, has worked in diverse geographic markets and in numerous lines of banking businesses. His executive management responsibilities in retail and institutional banking, mortgage, wealth management and insurance services enable him to provide valuable operational, strategic and financial perspectives to the Board. Mr. Dewey is a member of the National Association of Corporate Directors.

Experience and qualifications: Mr. Dewey became president and chief executive officer of Trustmark and the Bank on January 1, 2021. He was formerly president and chief operating officer of the Bank from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020. He served as chief operating officer of the Bank from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019, and as President of Corporate Banking from 2008 to 2018. Mr. Dewey, with 18 years of experience at Trustmark and 36 years in the financial services industry, has worked in diverse geographic markets and in numerous lines of banking businesses. His executive management responsibilities in retail and institutional banking, mortgage, wealth management and insurance services enable him to provide valuable operational, strategic and financial perspectives to the Board.

 

 

 

LOGO

LOGO

 

 

Marcelo Eduardo, 5860

Director of Trustmark since 2020

(Independent Director)

 

Trustmark Corporation Committees:

·   Audit

·   Executive

·   Finance (Chair)

·   Nominating & FinanceGovernance

 

Career Highlights:

·   Dean, School of Business, Mississippi College

Experience and qualifications: Mr. Eduardo has served as the Dean of the School of Business at a private college in Mississippi since 2003. He holds Ph.D. (Finance) and MBA degrees and serves as the Anderson Distinguished Professor of Finance at Mississippi College. Mr. Eduardo, an accomplished academic, has authored numerous articles on a variety of topics, including investment management, compliance, capital management and the pricing of retail banking services, which have been published in national and international journals. His expertise in banking and corporate finance, combined with his proven marketing and leadership skills, provide valuable marketing, strategic and financial perspectives to the Board, and qualifies him for service as one of the Board’s audit committee financial experts. Mr. Eduardo also served as Chair of the Bank Board’s Asset/Liability Committee (the responsibilities of which are now performed by the Finance Committee). He is a member of the National Association of Corporate Directors.

Experience and qualifications: Mr. Eduardo has served as the Dean of the School of Business at a private college in Mississippi since 2003. He holds Ph.D. (Finance) and MBA degrees and serves as the Anderson Distinguished Professor of Finance at Mississippi College. Mr. Eduardo, an accomplished academic, has authored numerous articles on a variety of topics, including investment management, compliance, capital management and the pricing of retail banking services, which have been published in national and international journals. His expertise in banking and corporate finance, combined with his proven marketing and leadership skills, will provide valuable marketing, strategic and financial perspectives to the Board. Mr. Eduardo also serves on the Bank Board’s Asset/Liability Committee.

 

 

16


 

 

LOGOLOGO 

 

J. Clay Hays, Jr., M.D., 5557

Director of Trustmark since 2017

(Independent Director)

 

Trustmark Corporation Committees:

·   Enterprise Risk (Chair)

●   Human Resources·   Executive

·   Nominating & Governance

 

 

Career Highlights:

·   Cardiologist, Partner, President, Jackson Heart Clinic, PA

Experience and qualifications: Dr. Hays is president of Jackson Heart Clinic, PA, one of the largest cardiology groups in Mississippi. He is a former chairman of the Mississippi Healthcare Solutions Institute and former director and past president of the Mississippi State Medical Association. He serves as director and secretary of the Medical Assurance Company of Mississippi, a statewide medical malpractice insurer. He is also a Mississippi Delegate to the American Medical Association House of Delegates and Chair Elect of the Southeast Delegation of the AMA House of Delegates. With extensive experience in the medical industry, Dr. Hays is uniquely positioned to advise Trustmark on the healthcare industry. Dr. Hays also served on the Bank Board’s Asset/Liability Committee (the responsibilities of which are now performed by the Finance Committee). He is a member of the National Association of Corporate Directors.

Experience and qualifications: Dr. Hays is president of Jackson Heart Clinic, PA, one of the largest cardiology groups in Mississippi. He serves as chairman of the Mississippi Healthcare Solutions Institute and as director and secretary of the Medical Assurance Company of Mississippi, a statewide medical malpractice insurer. He is also a director and immediate past president of the Mississippi State Medical Association. With extensive experience in the medical industry, Dr. Hays is uniquely positioned to advise Trustmark on the healthcare industry. Dr. Hays also serves on the Bank Board’s Asset/Liability Committee.

 

 

 

LOGO

LOGO

 

 

Gerard R. Host, 6668

Director of Trustmark since 2010

 

Chair of Trustmark Board since April 2022

Executive Chairman of Trustmark Board from

January 2021 to April 2020 to December 2020

 Executive Chairman of Trustmark Board

 since January 20212022

 

Trustmark Corporation Committees:

·   Executive

 

 

Career Highlights:

·   Former Executive Chairman, Trustmark Corporation and Trustmark National Bank

 

·   Former President and CEO, Trustmark Corporation

●   Former President and CEO, Trustmark National Bank

Experience and qualifications: Mr. Host has served as Chair of Trustmark and the Bank since April 2022. He served as Executive Chairman of Trustmark and the Bank from January 1, 2021 to April 26, 2022. Mr. Host served as president and chief executive officer of Trustmark and chief executive officer of the Bank from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2020, and served as president of the Bank from 2011 to December 31, 2019. He also served as a director of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta from 2012 until the end of his second term on December 31, 2018. Throughout his 38-year tenure with Trustmark, Mr. Host has served in a variety of executive management capacities, including chief financial officer, chief investment officer and president of various divisions. Mr. Host’s in-depth knowledge of Trustmark’s operations and of the financial services industry enables him to provide both historical and strategic perspectives in Board discussions regarding corporate strategy and governance matters. He is a member of the National Association of Corporate Directors.

17


 

LOGO

 

Experience and qualifications: Mr. Host became Executive ChairmanHarris V. Morrissette, 63

Director of Trustmark since 2016

(Independent Director)

Trustmark Corporation Committees:

·   Enterprise Risk

·   Finance

·   Human Resources

Career Highlights:

·   President, China Doll Rice & Beans, Inc.

(Regional Packaged and the Bank on January 1, 2021. Mr. Host served as presidentFood Services Company)

·   Former President and chief executive officer of Trustmark and chief executive officer of the Bank from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2020, and served as president of the Bank from 2011 to December 31, 2019. He also served as a director of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta from 2012 until the end of his second term on December 31, 2018. Throughout his 37-year tenure with Trustmark, Mr. Host has served in a variety of executive management capacities, including chief financial officer, chief investment officer and president of various divisions. Mr. Host’s in-depth knowledge of Trustmark’s operations and of the financial services industry enables him to provide both historical and strategic perspectives in Board discussions regarding corporate strategy and governance matters. Mr. Host will continue to serve as Executive Chairman of the Trustmark Board following the Annual Meeting.CEO, Marshall Biscuit Company, Inc.

Other Directorships:

·   Williamsburg Investment Trust

Experience and qualifications: Mr. Morrissette serves as the president of a regional packaged food and food services company based in Alabama. His prior years of service as a director of a publicly-traded financial institution provide him with valuable experience in financial institution governance and an understanding of markets that are a strategic focus for Trustmark. In addition, Mr. Morrissette’s background and business acumen provide him with the skills necessary to contribute invaluable insight and broad perspectives to Board discussions. He also served on the Bank Board’s Credit Policy Committee (the responsibilities of which are now performed by the Enterprise Risk Committee). Mr. Morrissette is a member of the National Association of Corporate Directors.

 

 

 

LOGOLOGO 

 Harris V. Morrissette, 61

 Director of Trustmark since 2016

 (Independent Director)

 Trustmark Corporation Committees:

●   Audit & Finance

●   Human Resources

        Career Highlights:

●   President, China Doll Rice & Beans, Inc.

●   Former President and CEO,
Marshall Biscuit Company, Inc.

        Other Directorships:

●   Williamsburg Investment Trust

Experience and qualifications: Mr. Morrissette serves as the president of a regional packaged food and food services company based in Alabama. His prior years of service as a director of a publicly-traded financial institution provide him with valuable experience in financial institution governance and an understanding of markets that are a strategic focus for Trustmark. In addition, Mr. Morrissette’s background and business acumen provide him with the skills necessary to contribute invaluable insight and broad perspectives to Board discussions and qualify him for service as one of the Board’s audit committee financial experts. He also serves on the Bank Board’s Credit Policy Committee.

LOGO

Richard H. Puckett, 6668

Director of Trustmark since 1995

Lead Director of Trustmark since 2020

(Independent Director)

 

Trustmark Corporation Committees:

·   Executive (Chair/Lead Director)

●   Executive (Chairman)

·   Human Resources

·   Nominating (Chair)& Governance (Chair/Lead Director)

 

Career Highlights:

·   Chairman and CEO, Puckett Machinery Company

(Distributor of Heavy Earth Moving

Equipment and Engine Power Systems)

Experience and qualifications: Mr. Puckett is the chairman and chief executive officer of a heavy equipment distribution and rental company with facilities located in Mississippi and eastern Louisiana that provide heavy equipment, engine power solutions and related supplies to a variety of industries. Mr. Puckett brings marketing and business leadership skills to the Board, as well as an in-depth understanding of the business climate and customer base in Trustmark’s major legacy markets. His experience and Board tenure provided valuable perspective to his service on the Bank Board’s Credit Policy Committee (the responsibilities of which are now performed by the Enterprise Risk Committee). Mr. Puckett is a member of the National Association of Corporate Directors.

Experience and qualifications: Mr. Puckett is the chairman and chief executive officer of a heavy equipment distribution and rental company with facilities located in Mississippi and eastern Louisiana that provide heavy equipment, engine power solutions and related supplies to a variety of industries. Mr. Puckett brings marketing and business leadership skills to the Board, as well as an in-depth understanding of the business climate and customer base in Trustmark’s major legacy markets. His experience and Board tenure provide valuable perspective to his service as Chair of the Bank Board’s Credit Policy Committee.

 

 

 

LOGO

LOGO

 

 

William G. Yates III, 4850

Director of Trustmark since 2009

 

Trustmark Corporation Committees:

●   Enterprise Risk·   Finance

 

Career Highlights:

 

·   President and CEO, W.G. Yates & Sons Construction Company

·   President and CEO, The Yates Companies, Inc.

Experience and qualifications: Mr. Yates is the president and chief executive officer of a commercial construction company with operating divisions located throughout the Southeast, many of which are within markets served by Trustmark. Mr. Yates’ knowledge of these markets, as well as his leadership experience in the various aspects of the construction industry, including employee relations matters, contract negotiations and risk management, provide the Board with an important resource for assessing and managing risks and planning for corporate strategy. He formerly served as a member of the Bank Board’s Asset/Liability Committee and Credit Policy Committee (the responsibilities of which are now performed by the Finance Committee and Enterprise Risk Committee, respectively). In January 2021, Mr. Yates was appointed a director of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, New Orleans Branch. In addition, he serves as a director and is former chairman of the Mississippi Economic Council. Mr. Yates is a member of the National Association of Corporate Directors.

Experience and qualifications: Mr. Yates is the president and chief executive officer of a commercial construction company with operating divisions located throughout the Southeast, many of which are within markets served by Trustmark. Mr. Yates’ knowledge of these markets, as well as his leadership experience in the various aspects of the construction industry, including employee relations matters, contract negotiations and risk management, provide the Board with an important resource for assessing and managing risks and planning for corporate strategy. He is also a member of the Bank Board’s Credit Policy Committee. In January 2021, Mr. Yates was appointed a director of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, New Orleans Branch. In addition, he serves as a director and is former chairman of the Mississippi Economic Counsel.

 

 

18


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Guiding Philosophy.The guiding philosophy of the Human Resources Committee of the Board (the Committee) is to attract and retain highly qualified executives and to motivate them to maximize shareholder value while managing risk appropriately and maintaining the safety and soundness of the organization. The Committee believes that executive compensation should be linked to Trustmark’s performance and significantly aligned with both the short-term and long-term interests of Trustmark’s shareholders. The Committee also believes that executive compensation should be designed to allow Trustmark to recruit, retain and motivate employees who play a significant role in the organization’s current and future success. Further, compensation policies and practices should be designed to help develop management talent, promote teamwork among, and high morale with, executive management, establish effective corporate governance, and set compensation at competitive levels.

Trustmark’s compensation policies reflect the Committee’s guiding philosophy, as shown below:

What we do:

  Substantial portion of executive pay based on performance against goals set by the Board

 

  Stock ownership requirements for executive officers

 

  Independent compensation consultant regularly advises the Committee

 

  Minimum vesting periods of not less than three years for equity awards, with three-year cliff vesting of time-based awards

 

  Clawback provisions that permit Trustmark to recover incentive-based compensation under certain circumstances

 

  Use of peer company data to help set executive compensation

 

  Annual advisory votes on executive compensation

 

  Oversight of compensation by the Human Resources Committee, which is comprised solely of independent directors

What we don’t do:

LOGO

No automatic or guaranteed annual salary increases

 

LOGO

No guaranteed bonuses or guaranteed long-term incentive awards

 

LOGO

No tax gross-ups for executive officers

 

LOGO

No “single-trigger” change in control severance payments

 

LOGO

No hedging of Trustmark stock

 

LOGO

No excessive perquisites

 

 

Key Elements of Compensation.The following table summarizes key elements of Trustmark’s executive compensation program and the primary objectives each element supports. The Committee believes these elements are standard compensation components for named executive officers (NEOs) at Trustmark’s peer companies:

 

Key Elements  Objectives

Base salary

  

·Attract and retain highly qualified executives

·Reward prior performance, industry and job specific knowledge, experience and leadership ability

Annual cash bonuses

  

·Reward achievement of annual corporate goals and, where applicable, line-of-business goals

Performance-based restricted stock

  

·Reward achievement of long-term objectives

·Create a direct link between management’s performance and shareholder value

Time-based restricted stock

  

·Align shareholder and management interests

·Retain key executives

·Supports achievement of stock ownership goals

19


Alignment Between Pay and Performance.Trustmark is committed to aligning the compensation of its executive officers with Trustmark’s financial and operational performance. The Committee believes that its current executive compensation program is helping to achieve these goals by aligning compensation with Trustmark’s performance. Key financial and core operating results for 20202022 included the following:

 

 · 

recordLoans held for investment (HFI) increased $2.0 billion, or 19.1%, in 2022,

·

Nonperforming assets declined to 0.55% of loans HFI and held for sale (HFS),

·

Net charge-offs represented 0.01% of average loans in 2022,

·

Net interest income FTE totaled $507.1 million, up 17.9% in 2022 to produce a net interest margin of 3.17%, up 41 basis points from 2021,

·

Insurance revenue increased 10.7% in 2022 while wealth management revenue remained stable,

·

Noninterest income totaled $160.0$205.1 million and represented 29.3% of total revenue,

·

Revenue totaled $699.9 million in 2022, up 6.4%9.3% from the prior year,

 · 

diluted earnings per shareNoninterest expense, excluding litigation settlement expense of $100.8 million, totaled $2.51,$502.5 million, up 8.2%2.7% from the prior year,

 · 

Net income totaled $71.9 million, representing diluted earnings per share of $1.17. Excluding litigation settlement expense, which reduced net income by $75.6 million, net income totaled $147.5 million, representing diluted earnings per share of $2.40. Information regarding the litigation settlement is included in Trustmark’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 3, 2023,

·

Paid quarterly dividendsdividend of $0.23 per share, or $0.92 per share annually,

 · 

return on average tangible equityMaintained strong capital position with CET1 ratio of 12.58%9.74% and total risk-based capital ratio of 11.91%, up from 12.45% in prior year,

 · 

loans held for investment increased $488.9 million, or 5.2%, to $9.8 billion from prior year,

mortgage loan production reached record levelExpanded market optimization efforts with a net reduction of $3.0 billion, up 69.4% from prior year,

deposits increased $2.8 billion, or 24.9%, to $14.0 billion from prior year,

total risk-based capital ratio of 14.12% at year-end 2020, up from 13.25% at end of prior11 branch offices during the year, and

 · 

supported local communities with loan originations totaling $970.0 million through SBA’s Paycheck Protection Program.Continued technology investments to enhance efficiency and productivity.

Return on average tangible equity is a non-GAAP financial measure, but does not have a comparable GAAP financial measure. Return on average tangible equity is calculated using net income adjusted for intangible amortization divided by total average tangible common equity (total shareholders’ equity less goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets).; it excludes the impact of (i) restructurings, discontinued operations, extraordinary items and other significant non-routine transactions, (ii) material litigation and insurance settlements, (iii) changes to comply with ASU 2016-02 and ASU 2016-13, and (iv) cumulative effects of income tax and accounting changes in accordance with US GAAP.

The Committee uses both annual cash bonuses and equity awards to link executive pay with Trustmark’s performance. Payouts under the annual management incentive plan are based on Trustmark’s achievement of key corporate, strategic and line of business performance goals. A minimum achievement of the threshold is required to earn the minimum annual cash bonus, and Trustmark performance that exceeds the target results in higher bonus awards. In 2020,2022, Trustmark’s performance resulted in average payouts for the NEOs under the annual management incentive plan of 172%160.0% of target, out of a maximum potential payout of 200%. In recent years, cash bonuses under the annual management incentive plan have averaged approximately 35%37.0% of the CEO’s and 26%33.3% of the other NEOs’ total annual compensation.

Total equity awards granted in 20202022 represent approximately 28%31% for the CEO’s, and 20%25% for the other NEOs’, total annual compensation. Performance-based equity awards granted in 2020,2022, which represented approximately 14%16% (for the CEO) and 10%13% (for the other NEOs) of each NEO’s total annual compensation, will be earned based on Trustmark’s achievement of return on average tangible equity (ROATE), compared to an absolute target level, and total shareholder return (TSR), which includes dividends, compared to Trustmark’s peer group, in each case over a three-year performance period. The performance-based equity awards granted in 20182020 were earned based on Trustmark’s achievement of ROATE compared to an absolute target level and TSR, which includes dividends, compared to Trustmark’s peer group, in each case over a three-year performance period. Trustmark’s performance over the three years ended December 31, 2020,2022, resulted in combined vesting ofachieved for the performance-based restricted stock awards granted in 2018 at a 93.5% performance-level, out2020 of a maximum potential vesting of 200%94.75%. For the same three-year period, Trustmark achieved 103.10% of absolute target level for ROATE and ranked in the 42nd percentile for TSR among the 19 peer companies utilized in Trustmark’s 2018 performance-based restricted stock awards.

Time-based equity awards, which in 20202022 represented approximately 14%16% of total annual compensation (for the CEO) and 10%13% (for the other NEOs), further encourage a focus on long-term growth and financial success by aligning the interests of management and Trustmark’s shareholders.

As a result of the structure of Trustmark’s annual management incentive plan and its performance-based equity awards, the Committee believes that compensation paidawarded to its NEOs is effectively aligned with Trustmark’s performance. Average payouts of annual cash bonuses under the management incentive plan of 123.7%158.7% of the target amount for each of the NEOs for the past three years relates directly to Trustmark’s achievement with respect to corporate and line of business budget targets for those years. Vesting of the performance -basedperformance-based equity awards of 93.5%94.75%, 73%42.2% and 78%93.5% for the three years ended December 31, 2020, 20192022, 2021 and 2018,2020, respectively, reflects how the amount of this incentive compensation earned depends on Trustmark’s performance, including compared to its peer companies.

20202022 Say on Pay Vote.In 2020,2022, the advisory shareholder vote on Trustmark’s executive compensation received approval of over 98.5%97.3% of the votes cast on the proposal. In light of such strong support, during the remainder of 20202022 and in 2021,2023, the Committee has continued to apply the same compensation philosophy that was described in the 20202022 proxy statement in determining amounts and types of executive compensation.

20


Board and Committee Process.In considering appropriate levels of compensation for executives, the Committee takes into account Trustmark’s performance and individual performance and experience, as well as peer and broader financial services industry comparisons (referred to as market data) and company affordability analysis. When deemed appropriate, the Committee will request that its independent compensation consultant, Pearl Meyer & Partners, LLC (Pearl Meyer), provide it with survey data of executive compensation for financial services companies that are comparable to Trustmark, generally based on line of business and asset size. The Committee does not request such

market data from Pearl Meyer every year, and in years when such data is not requested, Trustmark will apply customary aging methods to estimate appropriate updates to salary data.

The Chair of the Committee works with the CEO and the Human Resources department to establish the agenda for Committee meetings. The CEO and Human Resources department also interface with the Committee in connection with the Committee’s executive compensation decision-making, providing comparative market data as well as making recommendations. The Committee periodically meets with the CEO and members of the Human Resources department to assess progress toward meeting objectives set by the Board for both annual and long-term compensation. The Committee also meets in executive session without management present when appropriate.

The Committee reviews all of the components of compensation in making determinations on the mix, amount and form of executive compensation. In making compensation decisions, the Committee seeks to promote teamwork among, and high morale within, executive management, including the NEOs. While the Committee does not use any quantitative formula or multiple for comparing or establishing compensation for executive management, it is mindful of internal pay equity considerations and assesses the relationship of the compensation of each executive to other members of executive management.

Role of the Compensation Consultant.The Committee relies on Pearl Meyer to provide information, analyses and advice to aid in the determination of competitive executive and non-employee director pay consistent with Trustmark’s compensation philosophy, and periodically engages Pearl Meyer to test Trustmark’s pay-for-performance alignment. The Committee has assessed the independence of Pearl Meyer pursuant to SEC and Nasdaq rules and has concluded that the advice it receives from Pearl Meyer is objective and not influenced by other relationships that could be viewed as conflicts of interest.

With respect to Trustmark’s compensation program for executives and non-employee directors for 2020,2022, Pearl Meyer’s services for the Committee included:

 

 · 

providing market data regarding executive compensation in the banking and financial services industry,

 ·

providing competitive market analysis for the Executive Strategy and Management Committees, with consideration of salary, annual cash bonuses, and equity compensation,

·

reviewing the annual management incentive plan by providing observations on typical market practices, particularly performance metrics, performance targets, incentive scale and weightings,

· 

providing recommendations regarding compensation for newly appointed executive officers and certain changes in executive compensation,

 · 

providing recommendations regarding director compensation,market practices and trends for executive retirement and equity plans,

 

providing recommendations regarding equity vesting practices impacting directors and executives,

providing recommendations regarding changes to director and executive stock ownership guidelines,

· 

providing input on leadership succession planning, for 2020 and 2021,

 · 

providing recommendations regarding the composition of Trustmark’s peer group, and

 · 

reviewing drafts of this Compensation Discussion and Analysis.

Benchmarking.When determining the amount and form of compensation for executives, the Committee considers comparative executive compensation information provided by Pearl Meyer that is derived from two primary data sources: peer group data and market data from the banking and financial services industry. The Committee uses peer group data primarily to establish performance goals for long-term incentive awards to assist in the evaluation of its pay-for-performance alignment. The Committee also uses the peer group data and, as applicable, market survey data, to assist with assessing Trustmark’s compensation competitiveness. Recognizing that comparative pay assessments have inherent limitations, due to the lack of precise comparability of executive positions between companies, as well as the companies themselves, the comparative data are used only as a guide and the Committee does not fix any NEO’s compensation (or individual compensation elements) to a particular compensation level within this comparative data. In exercising its judgment to set pay levels, the Committee looks beyond the comparative data and also considers individual job responsibilities, individual performance, experience, compensation history (both at Trustmark and at prior employers in the case of newly hired associates), company performance and company goals.

Peer Group Data.The peer group data is gathered by Pearl Meyer from the proxy statements of a peer group of financial institutions in the United States. The peer group consists of a minimum of 15 financial institutions and is updated annually by the Committee, based on a process that includes recommendations from internal sources, including the Human Resources department, and external sources such as Pearl Meyer, to reflect the companies against which Trustmark competes for executive talent or for shareholder investment. The specific characteristics of the financial institutions comprising the peer group vary from year to year, but the companies are chosen based on a combination of various factors that include asset size and business mix. Additionally, the peer group is limited to financial institutions with at least $10 billion in total consolidated assets, as the Dodd-Frank Act and its implementing regulations impose various additional regulatory and operational requirements on bank holding companies with $10 billion or more in total consolidated assets.

As of December 31, 2019, Trustmark’s peer group, as reviewed by the Committee in February 2022, consisted of 1920 peer companies, all of which had assets within a range of approximately 93%68% to 238%208% of Trustmark’s asset size, which the Committee considers an appropriate

21


range for comparison purposes. The specific asset sizes for the peer companies listed in the report presented to the Committee in February 2020 ranged from approximately $12.6$12.0 billion to $32.2$36.5 billion, and the market capitalizations ranged from approximately $1.9$1.6 billion to $7.7$5.7 billion. Although Trustmark’s market capitalization and asset size were both substantially below the median for this peer group, the Committee felt it appropriate to limit the peer group to

institutions with at least $10 billion in total consolidated assets, as these institutions are subject to the same regulatory mandates as Trustmark.

For 2020,2022, Trustmark’s peer group consisted of the following companies:

 

  Company Name  Ticker  Company Name  Ticker  Company Name  Ticker

  BancorpSouth BankAmeris Bancorp

  BXSABCB  First Financial BancorpFFBCNBT Bancorp, Inc.NBTB

Hancock Whitney Corporation  Associated Banc-Corp

  HWCASB  

UMB FinancialFirst Merchants Corporation

  UMBF    FRMERenasant CorporationRNST
  Atlantic Union Bankshares CorporationAUBFulton Financial CorporationFULTSimmons First National CorporationSFNC

  Banner Corporation

  BANR  

Old NationalGlacier Bancorp,

Inc.
  ONBGBCI  

Umpqua Holdings Corporation

UMPQ    

    Commerce Bancshares, Inc.

CBSH

Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.

PNFP

United Bankshares, Inc.

  UBSI

    First Financial Bancorp.

FFBC

Prosperity Bancshares, Inc.

PB

United Community Banks, Inc.

UCBI    

    First Midwest Bancorp, Inc.

FMBI

Renasant Corporation

RNST

Webster Financial Corporation

WBS    

    Fulton Financial Corporation

FULT

Simmons First National Corporation

SFNC 

  Glacier Bancorp,Eastern Bankshares, Inc.

  GBCIEBC  Hancock Whitney CorporationHWCUnited Community Banks, Inc.UCBI

South State  FB Financial Corporation

  SSBFBKHeartland Financial USA, Inc.HTLFWesBanco, Inc.WSBC

  First Busey Corporation

BUSEIndependent Bank Group, Inc.IBTX   

Market Data.In making its 20202022 compensation recommendations, the Committee considered market data comparisons prepared by Pearl Meyer in August 2017,2021, including an analysis of the 25th 50thand (median) and 75th50th percentile of the compensation for base salary, (aged forward using a predetermined factor), annual cash incentive, long-term equity incentives and the total of these elements as a point of reference for each NEO. In August and November 2019, respectively, Pearl Meyer provided market data regarding Trustmark’s equity practices in addition to more recent data for the positions of President and CEO and the President and COO.other NEOs.

Compensation Mix.Mix. While the Committee considers the overall mix of executives’ pay between base salary, annual cash bonus and long-term incentive compensation, the Committee does not target a specific allocation among the various compensation components. Generally, more than one-half of the CEO’s compensation is contingent on performance, and approximately one-half of the compensation provided to the other NEOs is contingent on performance. In allocating compensation among salary, bonus and equity-based compensation, the Committee believes that the compensation of the senior-most levels of management with the greatest ability to influence Trustmark’s performance should be significantly performance-based, while lower levels of management should receive a greater portion of their compensation in base salary. The Committee also makes allocations between short-term and long-term compensation for NEOs. Consistent with its executive compensation philosophy and goals, in 2020,2022, the Committee provided that for the senior-most levels of management 100% of annual cash incentive payments and 50% of long-term equity-based awards would be determined based on achievement of performance targets.

The approximate percentages of salary, bonus and equity-based (using grant date fair value) compensation compared to the total of such compensation (referred to as total annual compensation) for 20202022 for the CEO and the other NEOs (averaged) were as follows:

 

LOGOLOGO

The compensation elements for the CEO for 20202022 were allocated as follows: 28%30% for base salary, 44%39% for cash bonus, and 28%31% for equity awards. On average, the compensation elements for the other NEOs for 20202022 were allocated as follows: 38%39% for base salary, 42%36% for cash bonus, and 20%25% for equity awards. Equity awards consist of both performance-based awards and time-vesting awards. Variable pay includes cash incentives, performance-based equity awards and time-vesting equity awards, the value of which varies with changes in Trustmark’s stock price. The equity awards percentage in the above calculations were valued as of the grant date based on the fair market value of the underlying stock. Other benefits, including Trustmark’s allocations and contributions to benefit plans and perquisites, are not considered in the above calculations. For more information on these benefits, please see “All Other Compensation for 2020”2022” table on page 30.31.

22


Base Salaries.Trustmark’s goal is to provide its executive management with fixed cash compensation in the form of base salary that will attract and retain highly qualified executives. Trustmark also uses base salary to reward top performance, industry and job specific knowledge, experience and leadership ability. The base salaries for Trustmark’s NEOs are typically established in the first quarter of the year after Trustmark’s financial information and performance results from the previous year are available, although mid-year adjustments are made occasionally to reflect changes in responsibility or other developments. The CEO’s base salary is established initially in an employment agreement but may be adjusted thereafter in the Committee’s discretion.

In establishing the CEO’s base salary, the Committee typically considers Pearl Meyer’s recommendations based on an analysis of peer group data and market data and also considers internal data provided by human resources personnel and the CEO’s individual performance and contributions relative to Trustmark’s corporate goals. In establishing base salaries of Trustmark’s other NEOs, the Committee typically considers the recommendations of the CEO, which are based on individual responsibility level, individual and company performance, total compensation histories for each such NEO, the market data provided by Pearl Meyer for similar positions and a general understanding of executive compensation in the financial services industry. The CEO evaluates thesuch other NEOs’ performance using the same metrics normally used for determining annual management incentive plan awards. The Committee considers each of these factors but does not assign a specific value to any of them. The Committee’s process also involves a subjective component in evaluating each NEO’s overall span of responsibility and control, knowledge and leadership ability.

Effective March 1, 2020,2022, the Board approved a 2% increaseincreases in base salary of 14.29% for Mr. HostDewey and a 3% base salary increase11.11% for Mr. Greer,Owens, and the Bank Board approved a 2%2.00% increase in base salarysalaries for Mr. Harvey. Effective January 1, 2020, Mr. Dewey was promoted to PresidentMessrs. Harvey, Stevens and Chief Operating Officer of the Bank. His salary change reflects his promotion.Tate. The base salaries in effect during 20192021 and 2020 were as2022 are shown below:

 

  Name  

2020

Base Salaries

($ )

    

2019

Base Salaries

($ )

    

% Change                

(%)                

Gerard R. Host

  $805,980    $790,176      2%                

Duane A. Dewey

  $500,000    $450,000    11%                

Louis E. Greer

  $400,000    $389,676      3%                

Robert B. Harvey

  $364,140    $357,000      2%                

Breck W. Tyler

  $324,729    $324,729      0%                
   Name  

2022

Base Salaries

($)

 

2021

Base Salaries

($)

 

            Percent Change            

(%)

 Duane A. Dewey (1)

  $                    800,000                  $                  700,000                     14.29%     

 Thomas C. Owens

  $400,000  $360,000   11.11

 Robert B. Harvey

  $408,000  $400,000   2.00

 Wayne A. Stevens

  $402,289  $394,401   2.00

 Granville Tate, Jr.

  $408,000  $400,000   2.00

(1)

2021 Base salary was established in accordance with Mr. Dewey’s employment agreement.

Cash Bonuses. The Committee typically awards cash bonuses utilizing a structured, objective approach based upon the achievement of performance objectives set forth in an annual management incentive plan. Cash bonuses constitute the largest cash component tied specifically to company performance.

Annual Management Incentive Plan.At the beginning of each year, Trustmark develops a bonus matrix for the management incentive plan. The performance goals are keyed to various corporate, strategic and, where applicable, line of business objectives, and the performance results at or slightly above the target levels are intended to be achievable, but challenging. The CEO recommends the bonus matrix to the Committee, including overall incentive target payout levels for each NEO, stated as a percentage of base salary. The CEO also recommends the performance measures and the weightings to be assigned to the performance measures for each NEO. Target level range for the CEO is established in his employment agreement.

For 2022, the Committee decided to add a performance goal for non-interest expense (Core) at 20% weighting through a corresponding decrease in weighting of 10% each to the metrics of efficiency ratio and EPS. The performance range for efficiency ratio was changed to better align with the market and the same range was applied to the new non-interest expense goal. Non-interest expense (Core) is a non-GAAP financial measure and excludes the impact of extraordinary items and other significant non-routine transactions as well as material litigation and insurance settlements. Efficiency ratio is also a non-GAAP financial measure and is calculated by dividing adjusted non-interest expense (which excludes significant non-routine transactions and material litigation and insurance settlements) by adjusted revenue (which reflects certain tax-equivalent adjustments).

The Committee reviews the CEO’s recommendations along with, as applicable, market data to ensure that proposed target payout levels provide an appropriate opportunity to earn bonuses and are competitive with the companies in Trustmark’s peer group. The Committee then makes a recommendation to the Board for approval. In making its recommendation, the Committee may consider events outside the influence or control of the NEOs and may adjust the performance goals to exclude the effect of these events. The Committee did not include any such adjustments when recommending the performance goals for 2020.

After the target levels and performance goals and weightings have been approved by the Board, the Committee retains the discretion to adjust the target levels and performance goals and weightings during the year, on an individual or group basis, if the Committee determines additional adjustments are appropriate for this purpose. The Committee did not make any such adjustments during 2020.2022. Following the end of a year, the Committee also has discretion to increase or decrease the amount of an award earned under the plan, change the individual weightings or adjust the threshold payout level and minimum performance goals, including when the minimum performance goals are not achieved. The Committee’s exercise of discretion is intended to ensure the management incentive plan appropriately rewards performance and neither overpays for results nor under rewards accomplishments achieved during the year.

23


The following are the primary features of the management incentive plan for 2020:2022:

 

 · 

uses EPS as the sole corporate goal to enhance the alignment of performance measures with Trustmark’s key strategic priorities,

 · 

includes corporate strategic operational drivers, with a weighting of at least 10% for each goal,

for certain executives working in a line of business, includes a line of business performance goal for net income to mitigate incentive risks and reflect total performance of the business unit, and

 · 

includes a range of potential payouts from 50% to 200% of target payout level to make the incentive payouts variable relative to performance.

The following table shows the threshold, target and potential maximum bonus payout levels established for each NEO under the management incentive plan, expressed as a percentage of base salary, for 2020:2022:

 

Name  

Below Threshold

Bonus Payout Level

(as percentage of salary) (1)

  

Threshold Bonus

Payout Level
(as percentage of salary)

 

Target Bonus

Payout Level

(as percentage of salary)

 

        Potential Maximum        

Bonus Payout Level

(as percentage of

salary)

  

Below Threshold

Bonus Payout Level

(as percentage of salary) (1)

  

Threshold Bonus

Payout Level

(as percentage of salary)

 

Target Bonus

Payout Level

(as percentage of salary)

 

Potential Maximum

Bonus Payout Level    

(as percentage of

salary)

Gerard R. Host (2)

        45.0%  90%  180%

Duane A. Dewey

        32.5%  65%  130%  ---  40.0% 80% 160%

Louis E. Greer

        25.0%  50%  100%

Thomas C. Owens

  ---  25.0% 50% 100%

Robert B. Harvey

        25.0%  50%  100%  ---  30.0% 60% 120%

Breck W. Tyler

        20.0%  40%  80%

Wayne A. Stevens

  ---  25.0% 50% 100%

Granville Tate, Jr.

  ---  30.0% 60% 120%

 

 (1)

If performance is below the threshold level for each of an NEO’s goals under the management incentive plan, no bonus is earned under the plan absent exercise of discretion by the Committee.

(2)

Mr. Host’s overall target bonus payout level for 2020 is established in his employment agreement.

Depending on achievement against the stated goals, the payout percentage, if any, for 20202022 could range from a level of 50% of the target bonus payout (for threshold performance achievement) to a level of 100% (for target performance achievement) to a level of 200% (for maximum performance achievement). If performance is below the threshold level for each of an NEO’s goals under the management incentive plan, no bonus is earned under the plan absent exercise of discretion by the Committee.

For 2020,2022, overall incentive targets for NEOs were allocated among a corporate performance goal and corporate strategic operational drivers and, for NEOs working in specific lines of business unless part of the Executive Strategy Committee, a line of business goal.drivers. The following table shows the weightings of these goals for each NEO for 2020:2022:

 

Name  

Corporate

Performance Goal

  

Corporate Strategic

Operational Drivers

  

        Line of Business        

Goal

  

Corporate

Performance Goal

  

Corporate Strategic

            Operational Drivers            

   

Gerard R. Host

    50%    50%    

Duane A. Dewey

    50%    50%      40%  60%     

Louis E. Greer

    50%    50%    

Thomas C. Owens

  40%  60% 

Robert B. Harvey

    50%    50%      40%  60% 

Breck W. Tyler

    30%    30%    40%

Wayne A. Stevens

  40%  60% 

Granville Tate, Jr.

  40%  60% 

For 2020,2022, the threshold and maximum performance levels continue to reflect the uncertainty of achieving the goals and provide variability in pay for changes in performance while also requiring high performance to reach the maximum payout level. For the 20202022 bonus matrix, the Committee recommended, and the Board approved, the following threshold and maximum performance levels for the NEOs:

 

  Performance Goal  

Threshold

Performance Level

(as percentage of performance goal)

  

Maximum

Performance Level

    (as percentage of performance goal)    

Corporate Performance Goal (all NEOs):

      

EPS

    85%    115%

Corporate/Strategic Operational Drivers (all NEOs):

      

Efficiency Ratio

    110%    90%

Non-performing assets/total loans + ORE

    120%    80%

Line of Business Goal (Tyler):

      

Mortgage Services

      

Net income

    85%    115%
  Performance Goal  

Threshold

Performance Level

(as percentage of performance goal)

 

Maximum

Performance Level

      (as percentage of performance goal)      

Corporate Performance Goal:

   

EPS

    85% 115% 

Corporate/Strategic Operational Drivers:

   

Efficiency Ratio

  105%   95%

Non-performing assets/total loans + ORE, excluding PPP loans

  120%   80%

Non-Interest Expense (Core)

  105%   95%

In the fourth quarter of 2022, Trustmark recorded a $100.8 million expense in non-interest expense related to the agreement to settle litigation arising from Trustmark’s historical banking relationship with the Stanford Financial Group (the “Stanford settlement”). The Stanford settlement is described in Trustmark’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 3, 2023. In accordance with the terms of the management incentive plan, following the end of the year the Committee exercised its discretion to recommend that the Board approve (and the Board so approved) the exclusion of the Stanford settlement expense in its entirety from the calculation of EPS and the other performance measures for 2022 under the management incentive plan. The Committee determined that it would be inappropriate to penalize management for its decision to settle the Stanford litigation, as the Committee and Board felt such settlement was in the best long-term interests of Trustmark and its shareholders, and that management should be recognized for its decision to approve the Stanford settlement not knowing whether it would impair their overall compensation. In addition, the Committee noted that none of the executives eligible to participate in the management incentive plan (including the NEOs) engaged in any actions in connection with Trustmark’s banking relationship with the Stanford Financial Group that contributed adversely to the company’s exposure to claims settled by the Stanford Settlement. For

24


these reasons, the Committee concluded, and the Board agreed, that the exclusion of the Stanford settlement expense from the applicable performance measures would appropriately reward the NEOs for Trustmark’s performance in 2022, which, but for the Stanford settlement, would have resulted in metrics that would have generated significant incentive compensation payments. The Committee further concluded, and the Board agreed, that taking this action would not result in Trustmark overpaying for results or under-rewarding accomplishments achieved during the year.

The following table shows the relevant performance goals established for 20202022 under the management incentive plan and the extent to which such goals were achieved:

 

   Performance Goals  

2020

  Targets  

 

2020 Results as

Approved by the

Committee

 

      Percentage      

      of Target Level      

      Achieved      

($ in millions)

       

Corporate Goal (all NEOs):

       

EPS

   $2.16  $2.52   116.67%

Corporate Strategic/Operational Drivers (all NEOs):

       

Efficiency ratio

    66.67%   64.05%   104.09%

Non-performing assets/total loans + ORE

    0.79%   0.73%   108.22%

Line of Business Goal (Tyler):

       

Mortgage Services

       

Net income

   $ 12.88  $ 69.45   539.21%
   Performance Goals  

2022

Targets

  

2022 Results as

  Approved by the  

Committee

 

Percentage

    of Target Level    

Achieved

($ in millions, other than per share data)

     

Corporate Goal:

     

EPS

  $1.94   $2.41       124.23%     

Corporate Strategic/Operational Drivers:

     

Efficiency ratio

   72.96%    68.97%   105.79

Non-performing assets/total loans + ORE, excluding PPP loans

   0.70%    0.55%   127.27

Non-Interest Expense (Core)

  $   462.508   $  498.356   92.81

The Committee determined bonus payments for each NEO by applying the relevant weighting to the achievement of the applicable performance goals for each NEO. The calculated bonus payments align with the strong 20202022 financial performance described above. The bonus amounts for all NEOs were approved by the Committee and by the Board on February 17, 2021.15, 2023. On or about March 15, 2021,2023, Trustmark will pay the following annual cash bonuses for 20202022 performance under the management incentive plan:

 

Name  

Total 2020 Annual Cash
Bonus Paid

($)

  

Total Annual Cash

Bonus Paid as Percentage of
Base Salary
(1)

(%)

 

      2020 Payment as      

      Percentage of Target (2)      

      (%)       

  

Total 2022 Annual Cash    

Bonus Paid    

($)    

  

Total Annual Cash

Bonus Paid as Percentage of

Base Salary (1)

(%)

 

2022 Payment as

Percentage of Target (2)

(%)

   

Gerard R. Host

   $1,229,684   152.57% 169.52%

Duane A. Dewey

   $550,950   110.19% 169.52%      $1,024,000     128.0%     160.0%       

Louis E. Greer

   $339,040   84.76% 169.52%

Thomas C. Owens

      $320,000     80.0  160.0 

Robert B. Harvey

   $308,645   84.76% 169.52%      $391,680     96.0  160.0 

Breck W. Tyler

   $235,948   72.66% 181.65%

Wayne A. Stevens

      $321,831     80.0  160.0 

Granville Tate, Jr.

      $391,680     96.0  160.0 

 

 (1)

Calculated using base salary as of March 1, 2020.2022.

 (2)

Performance achieved can range from 0% to a maximum of 200%, with target performance achievement being 100%. If performance achievement is below the threshold for an NEO, no bonus is earned under the plan absent exercise of discretion by the Committee.

These 20202022 annual cash bonus amounts are presented as Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation for 20202022 in the “Summary Compensation Table for 2020”2022” on page 29, including Mr. Tyler’s mortgage production bonus of $300,000.30.

Discretionary Bonuses.   During 2020, Mr. Harvey completed the implementation of amendments to FASB-AU 2016-13 for the new accounting standard commonly referred to as Current Expected Credit Losses (CECL) as issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). In recognition of his leadership in managing external and internal resources to design, model, validate, and implement the CECL methodology, and in light of the substantial complexity resulting in the successful implementation of CECL, the Board approved payment of a one-time discretionary bonus to Mr. Harvey in the amount of $25,000, which was paid in August 2020. In addition, the Committee recommended a discretionary payment of an additional $25,000 to Mr. Harvey in recognition of his management of the Payroll Protection Program during 2020. These 2020 discretionary bonus amounts are presented as Bonus for 2020 in the “Summary Compensation Table for 2020” on page 29.

Mortgage Production Bonus.   Recognizing that a production bonus is very common for executives in mortgage banking, and in an effort to remain competitive with Trustmark’s peer companies, Mr. Tyler receives a quarterly production bonus based on the mortgage division’s production, in addition to the annual cash bonus under the management incentive plan. Mr. Tyler’s production bonus is based on a percentage of total mortgage production above a threshold production level each quarter for mortgages that conform to the Bank’s origination guidelines, subject to an annual cap. The specific formula is not publicly disclosed for competitive reasons.

Equity-Based Compensation.Equity-based awards generally constitute the largest non-cash component of each NEO’s total compensation package. Pearl Meyer provides the Committee with peer company data and published surveys to assist the Committee in setting the amount of annual equity-based awards. For 2020, Messrs. Host and2022, Mr. Dewey received an annual equity-based awardsaward tailored to their positionshis position as CEO and COO.CEO. All other members of the Executive Strategy Committee received the same annual equity-based award and, all other members of executive management received the same, but smaller annual equity-based award. In establishing award levels, the Committee generally does not consider the equity ownership levels of the recipients or prior awards that are fully vested. Equity-based awards and the related performance goals for NEOs are recommended by the Committee and approved by the Board generally during the first quarter of each year. In 2022, after completing his first year as CEO, Mr. Dewey’s award level was increased by $200,000. All other members of the Executive Strategy Committee received an annual award level increase of $50,000. These increases were made in an effort to align award levels more closely with market practice. Awards are typically made as early as practicable in the year to maximize the time-period for achieving performance goals associated with the awards. Equity-based awards are

granted under the Trustmark Corporation Amended and Restated Stock and Incentive Compensation Plan (Amended and Restated Stock Plan).

For long-term equity incentive (LTI) awards made in 2020,2022, performance-based equity awards and time-based equity awards each represented 50% of the total award.for all NEOs. The Committee believes that performance-based restricted stock provides an effective means of delivering incentive compensation, a reward for achievement of long-term objectives and an effective means of executive retention, with normal vesting not occurring for three years. The Committee also believes that time-based equity awards, which have a three-year cliff vesting feature, promote an important goal of executive retention and help encourage greater levels of stock ownership by executives, while also having an incentive effect as a result of their value being linked to Trustmark’s stock price. The Committee will review the mix of LTI awards from time to time and make adjustments in the mix as needed to reflect its objectives for such awards.

Performance Awards. Beginning in 2020, performance-based equity awards consist of an award of restricted stock units (known as performance units) that also includes the potential to earn an equal number of additional restricted stock units (known as achievement units). The

25


For performance awards granted in 2022, the performance period began January 1, 2020,2022, and continues through December 31, 2022.2024. Consistent with past years, the performance units and achievement units vest based on the achievement of company performance goals related to ROATE and TSR over a three-year period. The performance units vest to the extent the aggregate vesting percentage ranges from 0% to 100%, and the achievement units vest to the extent the aggregate vesting percentage exceeds 100% (up to a maximum of 200%). The performance units and achievement units are settled in unrestricted shares following the end of the performance period. The executive generally must remain employed by Trustmark through the end of the performance period for the performance units and achievement units to vest fully (to the extent earned). Dividend equivalents are accumulated on the performance units, but not the achievement unit portion of the award. No interest is paid on accumulated dividend equivalents.

As noted above, the performance goals of ROATE and TSR are measured over a three-year performance period. The performance target of ROATE is established on the date of grant and is based on a forecasted three-year average of ROATE. The performance target of TSR is Trustmark’s TSR ranking as it relates to a defined peer group. The aggregate of the ROATE results and TSR results create a combined attainment.

The threshold, target and maximum levels are shown below for each performance goal as results are calculated and achievement is attained:

 

      Threshold    Target    Maximum
  Performance Goal                                  Results Attainment      Results Attainment      Results Attainment  

  ROATE Performance Level

      80% 25.00%      100%   50%      120%   100%

       (3 year average - actual to performance target)

                       

  TSR Ranking

      30th percentile 17.50%      50th percentile   50%      75th percentile   100%

       (as a percentile compared to Peers)

                                    

  Aggregate Vesting Attained

         42.50%           100%           200%
     Threshold    Target     Maximum

   Performance Goal

       Results      Attainment         Results     Attainment        Results     Attainment  

 ROATE Performance Level

(3-year average - actual to

performance target)

    80%  25.00%   100% 50%   120% 100%

 TSR Ranking

(as a percentile compared to Peers)

    30th percentile  17.50%   50th percentile 50%   75th percentile 100%

   Aggregate Vesting Attained

       42.50%     100%     200%

Prior to 2020, Trustmark granted performance-based equity awards consisting of a dual award of restricted stock and an equal number of achievement units. These awards have attributes similar to those described above.

Time-based Awards.The time-based units granted in 20202022 vest 100% at February 19, 2023,16, 2025, if the executive remains employed through such date (subject to certain exceptions). Dividend equivalents on any time-based restricted stock units are accumulated and will vest and be paid only when and to the extent the shares to which they relate vest, subject to a six-month delay when required by Section 409A. In 2020,2022, time-based awards were enhanced toalso provide for additional vesting upon retirement at or after age 65 with the consent of the Human Resources Committee. Retirement of the executive prior to the first anniversary of the grategrant date results in vesting of one-third of granted units, and retirement after the first anniversary of the grant date results in full vesting of granted units, in each case subject to a six-month delay when required by Section 409A.

The following table reflects the grant date fair values of the performance units and achievement units and time-based units granted to the NEOs in 2020:2022:

 

Name  

Value of

Performance

Units

($)

  

Value of

Achievement Units (1)

($)

  

Value of

Time-Based

RSUs

($)

  

        Total         

        ($)         

     

Value of

Performance

Units

($)

  

Value of

Achievement Units (1)

($)

  

Value of

Time-Based

RSUs

($)

 

Total

($)

Gerard R. Host

   $  395,651    ---   $  395,780   $  791,431 

Duane A. Dewey

   $173,092    ---   $173,162   $  346,254   $                399,607    ---  $            400,134          $              799,741             

Louis E. Greer

   $98,937    ---   $98,945   $  197,882 

Thomas C. Owens

  $124,902        ---  $125,034  $249,936 

Robert B. Harvey

   $98,937    ---   $98,945   $  197,882   $124,902    ---  $125,034  $249,936 

Breck W. Tyler

   $59,349    ---   $59,373   $  118,722 

Wayne A. Stevens

  $124,902    ---  $125,034  $249,936 

Granville Tate, Jr.

  $124,902    ---  $125,034  $249,936 

 

 (1)

Reflects the anticipated earning of the achievementperformance unit portion of the performance-based equity award based on achievement of performance measures at a 100% level of achievement;100%; achievement units will only be earned if, and only to the extent, the award’s aggregate ROATE and TSR vesting percentage exceeds 100%. The anticipated earning of the achievement unit portion of the performance unit award is projected to be zero, as the award’s ROATE and TSR vesting percentage is projected to be less than or equal to 100%.

26


The following table reflects the values realized by the NEOs on vesting of performance-based restricted stock awards and time-based restricted stock and RSU awards that vested during 20202022 from grants made in prior years. See the “Option Exercises and Stock Vested for 2020”2022” table on page 3334 for more information.

 

Name  

Value of

Performance-Based

Shares Vested (1)

($)

   

Value of

Time-Based

Shares Vested (2)

($)

   

        Total         

        ($)         

     

Value of

Performance-Based

Shares Vested (1)

($)

 

Value of

Time-Based

      Shares and RSUs Vested (2)      

($)

 

            Total            

($)

Gerard R. Host

   $  302,541      $  205,857    $  508,398  

Duane A. Dewey

   $    69,817      $    47,518    $  117,335    $63,617  $148,986  $212,603 

Louis E. Greer

   $    69,817      $    47,518    $  117,335              

Thomas C. Owens

  $25,434                    $                59,601                    $                85,035               

Robert B. Harvey

   $    69,817      $    47,518    $  117,335    $                  42,422  $99,324  $141,746 

Breck W. Tyler

   $    55,886      $    38,001    $    93,887  

Wayne A. Stevens

  $42,422  $99,324  $141,746 

Granville Tate, Jr.

  $42,422  $99,324  $141,746 

 

 (1)

Reflects 73%42.20% vesting of performance-based shares granted in 2017,2019, based on Trustmark’s 3-year ROATE and TSR performance against its peer companies.

 (2)

Reflects vesting of time-based shares granted in 2017.2019.

Retirement Benefits.Trustmark maintains certain plans providing retirement benefits in which the NEOs and certain other associates participate, as described below.

Executive Deferral Plan. Because of the limits for tax qualified retirement plans, Trustmark maintains a defined benefit supplemental retirement plan (Executive Deferral Plan) that provides additional retirement benefits to selected executives. TheWhile the Committee believes that the plan isprovided a competitive with Trustmark’selement and was a traditional component among peer financial institutions and is an importantas a tool in attracting andfor retaining executive management.management, the Committee has not recommended adding new participants to the plan since 2008. As a result, Mr. Tate and Mr. Owens, who joined the company after that time, are not participants.

NEOs selected for plan participation by the Committee receive retirement benefits generally equal to 50% of their covered salaries. The retirement benefit is payable for life, but not less than ten years, and commences at normal retirement age, which is 65, whether or not the participant is still employed, unless the early retirement or death provisions described below apply. Benefits payable pursuant to the plan are not subject to reduction for social security benefits.

The plan provides retirement and pre-retirement death benefits based upon a retirement benefit amount for each participant established by the Committee. The retirement benefit amount is based on the participant’s level of responsibilities and, in part, on his specified covered salary.

The following table shows, as to each NEO, annual retirement benefits anticipated to be paid at normal retirement:

 

   Name

        Annual Benefit        

($)

Gerard R. Host

$  300,000

Duane A. Dewey

$  100,000

Louis E. Greer

$  100,000

Robert B. Harvey

$  100,000

Breck W. Tyler

$  100,000
  Name  

Annual Benefit

($)

Duane A. Dewey

  $100,000    

Thomas C. Owens

   ---          

Robert B. Harvey

  $                  100,000  

Wayne A. Stevens

  $100,000  

Granville Tate, Jr.

   ---  

The plan permits early retirement at or after age 55 with five years of plan participation. Benefits at early retirement are actuarially reduced. The plan also provides a deferred vested benefit payable at normal retirement age to a participant terminating for reasons other than retirement with at least one year of plan participation or retiring early with a pre-existing election to be paid commencing at his or her normal retirement date. Normally, the deferred benefit is accrued and vests at the rate of 1/10th of the anticipated normal retirement benefit for each year of plan participation for a maximum of ten years. However, certain incremental increases vest over the time period ending in the year the participant reaches age 64. If a participant does not complete at least one year of plan participation, plan benefits are forfeited (except where the cessation of employment is due to death, retirement, total disability or just

cause as defined in the plan). Should a participant die prior to retirement and prior to when the participant’s retirement benefit commences to be paid, the participant’s beneficiary will receive a death benefit equal to a percentage (100% for the first year and 75% for the remaining years) of a specified covered salary amount (which amount is twice the anticipated normal retirement benefit) for ten years or until the participant would have reached normal retirement age, whichever is later. Life insurance contracts have been purchased to fund payments under the plan.

In 2019, Mr. Host became eligible for payments under the Executive Deferral Plan. However, the plan provides that payments shall be delayed if such payments would not be deductible under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. As a result, payments to Mr. Host for 2019 and 2020 were delayed.

See the “Pension Benefits for 2020”2022” table on page 34 for more information regarding this plan.

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan.Trustmark also provides a Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan (the NQDC Plan) that provides additional cash compensation deferral opportunities for executives who are impacted by the compensation and contribution limits that restrict participation in Trustmark’s 401(k) plan. The Committee believes the plan is competitive with those offered by Trustmark’s peer financial institutions and is an important tool in attracting and retaining executive management. The plan allows executives, including NEOs, to defer on a pre-tax basis up to 90% of annual base salary and/or cash bonus. No contribution is madeThe NQDC Plan was amended in 2022 to this planpermit discretionary contributions by Trustmark.Trustmark, and in March 2023 Trustmark contributed an aggregate amount of $124,559 to the CEO’s and other NEOs’ accounts. The contributions in respect of 2022 were based on Trustmark’s performance in 2022 and took into account the Stanford settlement. Each executive’s deferred income is credited to an account, which is deemed invested in and mirrors the performance of one or more designated

27


investment funds available under the plan and selected at the option of the executive. Distributions can be received under this plan upon retirement, death, long-term disability, termination of employment or during employment at specified dates.

In 2020,2021 and 2022, Mr. HostDewey had a scheduled distribution from the NQDC Plan. However, the plan provides that any distribution shall be delayed if such distribution would not be deductible under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. As a result, the scheduled distributiondistributions to Mr. HostDewey for 2020 was2021 and 2022 were delayed.

See the “Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation for 2020”2022” table on page 3435 for more information regarding this plan and see the “Summary Compensation Table for 2020”2022” on page 2930 and the “All Other Compensation for 2020”2022” table on page 3031 for more information regarding Trustmark’s contribution to Trustmark’s 401(k) Plan.

Perquisites; Other Benefits.Perquisites provided to each NEOexecutive officers are reviewed annually within the context of Trustmark’s executive compensation program, market practices and the nature of each NEO’ sexecutive’s responsibilities. Generally, Trustmark limits the types of perquisites offered to NEOsexecutive officers as shown in the “All Other Compensation for 2020”2022” table on page 30.31.

The Committee believes the currently-offered perquisites are minimal in overall cost and competitively necessary to attract and retain talented executives. Consistent with most other financial institutions in its peer group, Trustmark encourages executive management to belong to a golf or social club so that there is an appropriate entertainment forum for customers and appropriate interaction with the executives’ communities. Trustmark pays the initiation fee and annual dues for a club membership for some of the NEOs. In addition, Trustmark provides Messrs. HostDewey and DeweyStevens with use of a company-owned automobile. In addition, the Board authorizes an annual allowance of up to 15 hours and 10 hours of personal use of Trustmark’s airplane for the Executive Chairman and CEO, respectively, which provides an efficient way to maximize each executive’sthe CEO’s available time for company business.

Severance and Change in Control Benefits.Upon any termination of employment, NEOs would be entitled to receive their vested benefits under the 401(k) plan, NQDC Plan and supplemental retirement plan (Executive Deferral Plan), although these benefits generally would not be increased or accelerated (except for the acceleration of additional years of service provided under the Executive Deferral Plan under certain circumstances).

Trustmark believes that additional severance benefits are appropriate for executive management because it may be difficult for senior executives to find comparable employment within a short period of time. As discussed above, Trustmark’s restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards provide for accele ratedaccelerated vesting upon a change in control and upon certain termination events, and an incremental benefit is provided under the Executive Deferral Plan upon certain termination events following a change in control.

In light of the CEO’s and other NEOs’ role and importance to the success of Trustmark, the Committee believes that it is appropriate to provide for severance and change in control benefits in written agreement s.agreements. The Committee further believes that providing change in control benefits to the CEO and other NEOs should eliminate any reluctance to pursue potential change in control transactions that may be in the best interests of shareholders. Trustmark also believes that the severance and change in control benefits it provides are customary among its peers.

With the exception of the accelerated vesting of restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards, Trustmark’s change in control benefits provided to the CEO and other NEOs are generally “double trigger,” which means that the benefits are payable only if the executive’s employment is terminated other than for cause, death or disability or if the executive resigns for good reason, in each case within a specified period following a change in control. Trustmark believes that these benefits are consistent with the general practice among its peers. In addition, Trustmark believes the use of a double trigger in most cases reasonably balances the needs of the executive and Trustmark by protecting the legitimate interests of executives in employment security without unduly burdening Trustmark or shareholder value.

Trustmark does not provide any tax gross-ups related to severance or other compensation or benefits that

executives may receive in connection with a change in control. Change in control benefits are provided on a “best net” approach, under which an executive’s change in control benefits are reduced to avoid the golden parachute excise tax only if such a reduction would cause the executive to receive more after-tax compensation than without a reduction.

For additional information on Trustmark’s employment and change in control agreements with its NEOs, please see “Employment and Change in Control Agreements with NEOs” beginning on page 36.40.

Deductibility of Compensation.  Compensation.In making compensation decisions, the Committee considers Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, which limits the tax deductibility of certain compensation in excess of $1 million paid to Trustmark’s NEOs.

Although tax deductibility continues to be a consideration when determining executive compensation levels, the Committee believes that factors other than tax deductibility should take precedence in certain situations. Given the competitive market for outstanding executives, for example, the Committee believes that it is important to retain the flexibility to determine compensation elements consistent with Trustmark’s compensation philosophy, even if some executive compensation is not fully deductible under Section 162(m). Accordingly, the Committee does approve elements of compensation for certain executives that are not fully deductible by Trustmark and reserves the right to do so in the future when appropriate. In 2020,2022, a portion of Messrs. Host’s andMr. Dewey’s compensation was not deductible by Trustmark under Section 162(m).

Policy Against Hedging and Limitations on Pledging.To ensure that Trustmark directors, officers and employees bear the full risks of stock ownership, Trustmark’s Insider Trading Policy prohibits Trustmark directors, officers and employees from engaging in any form of hedging transactions relating to Trustmark stock. With limited exceptions, directors and executive

28


officers are also prohibited from pledging or creating a security interest in any Trustmark stock they hold, and no director or executive officer currently holds any Trustmark stock that is pledged or otherwise subject to a security interest.

Stock Ownership Guidelines.To help mitigate risks associated with Trustmark’s compensation programs and encourage management to focus on long-term growth and financial success, Trustmark has guidelines that require the CEO Executive Chairman and other members of executive management of the Bank to own, at minimum, the number of shares of Trustmark stock equal in value to a multiple of their base salary.

The guidelines as of January 1, 20212023 are as follows:

 

Multiple of Base Salary

CEO

  5x

Executive Chairman

5x

Executive Strategy Committee

  2x

Other Executive Management

  1.5x

The guidelines calculate the number of shares to be owned by reference to an executive’s base salary as of March 1 of each year and the 10-day trading average share price through March 31 each year. Shares of unvested time-based restricted stock are counted as shares owned for purposes of the guidelines. Pledged shares are not considered to be owned for purposes of the stock ownership guidelines. The Human Resources Committee reviews stock ownership levels of executive management annually. Until an executive has reached the applicable ownership level, the executive is required to hold 100% of the shares received from any Trustmark stock awards. Based on the most recent review of ownership level attainment in 2020,2022, Messrs. Host, GreerHarvey, Stevens and TylerTate owned the minimum number of shares required to satisfy the guidelines. Mr.Messrs. Dewey isand Owens are expected to satisfy the stock ownership guidelines, over time, which increased as a result of his new position as CEO. Mr. Harvey is expected to satisfy the stock ownership guidelines as of March 1, 2021.time.

Executive Compensation Recoupment.Since 2011, the Committee has included clawback provisions in performance awards and the management incentive plan with respect to annual cash bonuses that may be earned under the plan. Under these provisions, any performance awards or restricted stock unit award that vests or cash bonus paid is subject to recovery by Trustmark as required by applicable federal law and/or such basis as the Board determines. The Committee anticipates adopting a comprehensive executive clawback policy if the SEC publishesfollowing approval of final rules and Nasdaq listing standards implementing the clawback requirements under the Dodd-Frank Act.

Analysis of Risk Associated with Trustmark’s Compensation Policies and Practices.In late 20202022 and early 2021,2023, the Committee, together with Trustmark’s risk and human resources officers, conducted an in-depth risk assessment of Trustmark’s compensation policies and practices. Management prepared detailed materials regarding the operation of Trustmark’s various compensation arrangements with its associates and submitted the materials to Trustmark’s risk officers, who reviewed the materials with the members of management most closely involved with the respective compensation arrangements. Trustmark’s risk officers identified the key enterprise risks to which Trustmark is subject, including credit, liquidity, market/interest rate, compliance, operational, technology, strategic, reputational and other risks, and focused their review on the compensation arrangements most likely to implicate those risks. Trustmark’s Chief Administrative Officer General Counsel and Chief Risk Officer presented the risk officers’ conclusions and

supporting materials to the Committee, which reviewed and discussed the analysis at its meeting on February 16, 2021.14, 2023.

The Committee has concluded that Trustmark’s compensation policies and practices have sufficient mitigating features and controls to maintain an appropriate balance between prudent business risk and resulting compensation and encourage appropriate risk behavior consistent with Trustmark’s risk appetite, business strategy and profit goals. Some of the mitigating features and controls used are the overall compensation mix, weighting of performance metrics, timing of awards in relation to performance measurement period, use of full value equity -basedequity-based awards with multi-year vesting periods, and establishment of targets with payouts at multiple levels of performance, chargeback provisions on returned or unearned commissions, capped upside opportunities, and oversight by executive management and the Board. In addition, Trustmark’s incentive compensation arrangements are subject to a system of internal controls to ensure that incentive compensation is properly tracked, approved and paid. Trustmark’s internal controls include comparisons throughout the year of performance results against performance requirements, approval by appropriate levels of management, the Committee, the Board and/or the Bank Board of incentive compensation payouts, with separate review and approval by division controllers of lines of business that have significant incentive compensation payouts, and coordination among human resources, accounting, and payroll personnel to ensure that incentive compensation payouts that have been approved are appropriately reconciled to those approvals before and after payment is made. As a result, the Committee concluded that Trustmark’s compensation policies and practices are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on Trustmark, do not encourage imprudent risk -takingrisk-taking behavior and are consistent with maintaining the organization’s safety and soundness.

29


Summary Compensation Table for 2020  2022

The following table summarizes the compensation components for theeach person who served as CEO theand CFO and each ofduring 2022, as well as the next three most highly compensated executive officers during 20202022, and indicates their positions as of December 31, 2020.2022. Although considered “officers” of Trustmark Corporation under the Exchange Act, the NEOs’ compensation, except for equity awards under Trustmark’s stock and incentive compensation plans, is paid by the Bank. The amounts reported in the “Change in Pension Value and Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” column were not paid to the NEOs in any year shown. These amounts represent the annual change in the present value of potential future benefits the NEOs might receive upon retirement, assuming the benefits have vested.

 

                       Change in      
                       Pension Value      
                       and Non-      
                    Non-Equity  Qualified      
                Option  Incentive Plan  Deferred  All Other   
  Name and Principal         Bonus  Stock  Awards  Compensation  Compensation  Compensation   
  Position      Salary  (1)  Awards (2)  (3)  (4)  Earnings (5)   (6)  Total
    Year  ($)  ($)  ($)  ($)  ($)  ($)  ($)  ($)

Gerard R. Host (7)

    2020     $  803,346    ---     $  791,431    ---     $  1,229,684   $   638,447   $  153,434   $  3,616,342

President and CEO,

    2019     $787,594   $  13,889   $818,183    ---     $700,254   $660,550   $114,795   $3,095,265

Trustmark

                                    

Corporation;

    2018     $772,150    ---     $818,362    ---     $756,322    ---     $75,746   $2,422,580

CEO,

                                 

Trustmark National

                                 

Bank

                                    

Duane A. Dewey (9)

    2020     $500,001    ---     $346,254    ---     $550,950   $210,606   $41,988   $1,649,799

President and Chief

                                 

Operating

    2019     $450,000    ---     $306,839    ---     $265,905   $251,586   $34,196   $1,308,526

Officer, Trustmark

    2018     $368,982    ---     $204,606    ---     $190,538   $--   $31,627   $795,753

National Bank

                              

Louis E. Greer (8)

    2020     $398,279    ---     $197,882    ---     $339,040   $77,129   $35,073   $1,047,403

Treasurer,

    2019     $388,403    ---     $204,571    ---     $191,876   $275,726   $34,232   $1,094,808

Principal Financial

    2018     $380,787    ---     $204,606    ---     $207,216   $15,453   $33,080   $841,142  

Officer and Principal

                              

Accounting Officer,

                           

Trustmark

                                

Corporation;

                              

Executive Vice

                              

President and

                              

Chief Financial

                           

Officer,

                                

Trustmark National

                              

Bank

                              

Robert B. Harvey

    2020     $362,950   $50,000   $197,882    ---     $308,645   $236,474   $25,709   $1,181,660

Executive Vice

                           

President and Chief

                              

Credit Officer,

                              

Trustmark

                              

National Bank

                              

Breck W. Tyler

    2020     $324,729    ---     $118,722    ---     $535,948   $229,166   $22,266   $1,230,831

President-Mortgage

    2019     $323,668   $45,000   $122,736    ---     $329,559   $254,493   $21,346   $1,096,802

Services, Trustmark

    2018     $317,322    ---     $122,764    ---     $322,231    ---     $21,125   $783,442

National Bank

                           

    Name and Principal

    Position

 

  Year   

Salary

($)

   

Bonus
(1)

($)

   

Stock

Awards (2)

($)

   

Option
Awards

(3)

($)

      

Non-Equity

Incentive Plan
Compensation
(4)

($)

      

Change in
Pension Value
and Non-

Qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
(5)

($)

      

All Other
Compensation
(6)

($)

   

Total

($)

 

Duane A. Dewey (7)

   2022   $    783,333    ---   $799,741    ---     $1,024,000      ---     $ 132,205   $    2,739,279     

President and Chief Executive Officer,

   2021   $700,000    ---   $909,128    ---         $   769,720     ---         $   93,578   $2,472,426     

Trustmark Corporation and Trustmark National Bank

   2020   $500,001    ---   $346,254    ---     $   550,950     $  210,606     $   41,988   $1,649,799     

Thomas C. Owens (8)

   2022   $393,333    ---   $249,936    ---     $   320,000     ---     $   37,748   $1,001,017     

Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer,

   2021   $350,000    ---   $305,139    ---     $   263,880     ---     $   34,933   $953,952     

Trustmark Corporation, Chief Financial Officer, Trustmark National Bank

                           

Robert B. Harvey

   2022   $406,667    ---   $249,936    ---     $   391,680     ---     $   27,777   $1,076,060     

Executive Vice President, Chief Credit and Operations Officer,

   2021   $386,879   $ 25,000   $203,194    ---     $   272,253     ---     $   26,170   $913,496     

Trustmark National Bank

   2020   $362,950   $50,000   $197,882    ---     $   308,645     $  236,474     $   25,709   $1,181,660     

Wayne A. Stevens

   2022   $400,975    ---   $249,936    ---     $   321,831     ---     $   48,287   $1,021,029     

President – Retail Banking, Trustmark National Bank

                     

Granville Tate, Jr. (9)

   2022   $406,667    ---   $249,936    ---     $   391,680     ---     $   44,348   $1,092,631     

Secretary, Trustmark Corporation

   2021   $400,000    ---   $402,911    ---     $   351,880     ---     $   42,110   $1,196,901     

Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer, and Secretary, Trustmark National Bank

              ��      

 

 (1)

NoThe 2021 amount shown for Mr. Harvey is a $25,000 discretionary bonus was awarded tofor his continued management of the NEOs for 2018.Payroll Protection Program. The 2020 amount shown for Mr. Harvey is a $25,000 discretionary bonus for his implementation of CECL, and a $25,000 discretionary bonus for his management of the Payroll Protection Program. BothAll were recommended by the CEO and approved by the Board. The 2019 amount shown for Mr. Host represents a recognition for his service and time spent serving as President of the Board for the Mississippi Bankers Association in 2018. The 2019 amount shown for Mr. Tyler is a discretionary bonus which was recommended by the CEO and approved by the Board for the exceptional year in Mortgage Production.

 (2)

The amounts in this column reflect restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards granted to the NEOs during 2020, 2019,2022, 2021, and 20182020 and are disclosed as the aggregate grant date fair value of the awards, computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718, based, in the case of performance awards, on the then-anticipated outcome and excluding the impact of estimated forfeitures. These awards include performance awards that will vest only if the related performance measures are achieved. For the performance awards granted in 2020, 20192022, 2021, and 2018,2020, the amounts reported in this column reflect the grant date fair value based on the achievement of less than the maximum performance level. The grant date fair values, based on achievement of the maximum performance level, would be as follows for the awards granted:

 

   2020     2019     2018

Host

  $588,113    $672,950    $587,145    

Dewey

  $257,291    $252,390    $146,821    

Greer

  $147,064    $168,279    $146,821    

Harvey

  $147,064    ---      ---  

Tyler

  $  88,219          $100,945          $  88,101    
   2022    2021     2020        

Dewey

  $ 605,980     $ 458,873      $257,291          

Owens

  $189,406     $152,958      ---          

Harvey

  $189,406     $152,958      $147,064          

Stevens

  $189,406      ---      ---          

Tate

  $189,406     $152,958      ---          

Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in Note 15 to Trustmark’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2022, in Trustmark’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 16, 2023.

 (3)

Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in Note 16 to Trustmark’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020, in Trustmark’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 18, 2021.

(3)

No stock option awards were made during 2020, 2019,2022, 2021, or 2018.2020. Trustmark does not have any stock options outstanding currently.

 (4)

This column shows the value of annual cash bonuses earned under Trustmark’s management incentive plan.Non-equity incentive plan compensation for Mr. Tyler includes both his annual cash bonus earned under Trustmark’s management incentive plan and his quarterly mortgage department production bonus incentives.

 

30


 (5)

The amounts shown in the table above reflect the changes in actuarial present value of the NEO’s accumulated benefits under the Executive Deferral Plan, determined using interest rate and mortality rate assumptions consistent with those used in Trustmark’s audited financial statements and exclude amounts which the NEO may not have been entitled to receive because such amounts were not yet vested. In 20202022 and 2019,2021, decreases in pension value of the Executive Deferral Plan benefits were largely the result of an increase in the 2022 and 2021 discount rates. In 2020, increases in pension value of the Executive Deferral Plan benefits were largely the result of a decrease in the 2020 discount rate. Messrs. Owens and 2019 discount rates; converselyTate are not participants in 2018, decreases in pension value of the Executive Deferral Plan benefits were largely the result of an increase in the 2018 discount rate. Negative changes in pension values in 2018 were as follows: Host — $(131,158); Dewey — $(71,128); Tyler — $(32,392). The incremental increase in benefits for Mr. Greer was greater than the negative effects of the increase in discount rate.Plan. There is no above-market interest or earnings to report with respect to deferred compensation. Positive changes for 2020 are shown in the Summary Compensation Table, and negative changes for 2022 and 2021 in pension values were as follows:

   2022     2021 

Dewey

  $(316,075    $(48,182

Owens

   ---      --- 

Harvey

  $(286,126    $(8,627

Stevens

  $(341,247     --- 

Tate

   ---      --- 

 

 (6)

See the following table for details of all other compensation for 2020.2022.

 (7)

Mr. Host became Executive Chairman of Trustmark and the Bank effective January 1, 2021.

(8)

Mr. Greer retired as Treasurer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of Trustmark and Executive Vice President and CFO of the Bank effective March 1, 2021.

(9)

Mr. Dewey became President and CEO of Trustmark and CEO of the Bank effective January 1, 2021. He served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Trustmark National Bank from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020.

(8)

Mr. Owens became Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer of Trustmark and CFO of the Bank effective March 1, 2021.

(9)

Mr. Tate served as Chief Administrative Officer, General Counsel, Chief Risk Officer and Secretary of the Bank until November 22, 2021, when he became Chief Administrative Officer, General Counsel and Secretary of the Bank. Effective December 1, 2021, Mr. Tate became the Chief Administrative Officer and Secretary of the Bank and continued as Secretary of Trustmark.

All Other Compensation for 20202022

The detail of all other compensation for 20202022 is included in the following table:

 

Name  

Use of

Company

Airplane (1)

($)

  

Automobile

Allowance/Use of

Company-Provided

Automobile (2)

($)

  

Dividends on

Unvested Time-

Based Restricted

Stock (3)

($)

  

Club

Dues

($)

  

401(k)        

Match        

($)         

  

Total

  ($)

 

Use of

Company

Airplane (1)

($)

 

Automobile

Allowance/Use of

Company-
Provided

Automobile (2)

($)

 

Dividends on
Unvested Time-
Based Restricted

Stock (3)

($)

 

Club

Dues

($)

 

401(k)

Match

($)

 

Total

($)

Gerard R. Host

   $  83,558   $  9,664   $  34,438   $  8,674   $  17,100   $153,434        

Duane A. Dewey

    ---     $  4,054   $  12,150   $  8,684   $  17,100   $41,988          $  51,422   $      17,796   $   35,771   $   8,916  $18,300  $132,205     

Louis E. Greer

    ---      ---     $8,609   $  9,364   $  17,100   $35,073        

Thomas C. Owens

  ---   ---   $   11,334   $   8,114  $18,300  $37,748     

Robert B. Harvey

    ---      ---     $8,609    ---     $  17,100   $25,709          ---   ---   $     9,477   $        ---  $18,300  $27,777     

Breck W. Tyler

    ---      ---     $5,166    ---     $  17,100   $22,266        

Wayne A. Stevens

  ---   $      11,090   $     9,477   $   9,420  $ 18,300  $  48,287     

Granville Tate, Jr.

  ---   ---   $   16,272   $   9,776  $ 18,300  $44,348     

 

 (1)

The aggregate incremental cost of Mr. Host’sDewey’s personal use of the company airplane is calculated based on the annual cost of operating the company airplane. Operating costs include depreciation, fuel, maintenance, insurance, flight crew expenses (including pilot salaries), landing fees and hangar expenses, and other miscellaneous expenses. Total annual operating costs are divided by the total number of hours the company airplane was used during the year to determine the average operating cost per hour. The average operating cost per hour is then multiplied by the hours Mr. HostDewey used the company airplane for personal use to determine Trustmark’s aggregate incremental cost.

 (2)

The aggregate incremental cost of Messrs. Host’sDewey and Dewey’sStevens’ personal use of a company-owned automobile is calculated based on the annual cost to Trustmark to own and operate each automobile (taking into account depreciation, insurance, taxes, repairs, maintenance and fuel) multiplied by the percentage that Messrs. HostDewey and Dewey respectively,Stevens used the automobile for personal rather than business travel.

 (3)

The amounts in this column reflect the dividends credited to shares of unvested time-based restricted stock held by the NEOs on each dividend payment date during 2020.2022. These dividends are accumulated and will vest and be paid only when and to the extent the related restricted shares vest, subject to a six-month delay when required by Section 409A.

31


Grants of Plan-Based Awards for 20202022

The following table presents information regarding incentive-based cash bonuses and equity awards granted to the NEOs during or for the year ended December 31, 2020,2022, under Trustmark’s annual management incentive plan (cash), the mortgage department production bonus incentive for Mr. Tyler (cash) and Amended and Restated Stock Plan (restricted stock/restricted stock units) and, in the case of incentive-based awards, reflects the amounts that could be earned or received under such awards:

 

                        All
Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of
  All Other
Option
Awards:
  Exercise  

Grant

Date Fair

               Estimated Future Payouts  Shares  Number of  or Base  Value of
      Estimated Possible Payouts  Under Equity Incentive  of  Securities  Price of  Stock and
      Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1)  Plan Awards (2)   Stock or  Underlying  Option  Option
                        Units        Awards
  Grant   Threshold  Target  Maximum  Threshold  Target  Maximum  (3)  Options  Awards  (4)   

Estimated Possible Payouts

Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1)

 

Estimated Future Payouts

Under Equity Incentive

Plan Awards (2)

 

All
Other

Stock

Awards:

Number
of

Shares
of

Stock or

 All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
 

Exercise

or Base
Price of

 Grant
Date
Fair
Value of
Stock
and
Option
 
Name  Date   ($)  ($)  ($)  (#)  (#)  (#)  (#)  (#)  ($/Sh)  ($) Grant Date 

Threshold

($)

 

Target

($)

 

Maximum

($)

 

Threshold

(#)

 

Target

(#)

 

Maximum

(#)

 

Units
(3)

(#)

 

Underlying
Options

(#)

 

Option
Awards

($/Sh)

 

Awards
(4)

($)

 

Gerard R. Host

    $362,691  $725,382  $1,450,764  ---    ---    ---    ---    ---    ---    ---  
   2/19/2020   ---    ---    ---    2,165  12,373  24,746  ---    ---    ---    $395,651
   2/19/2020   ---    ---    ---    ---    ---    ---    12,372  ---    ---    $395,780

Duane A. Dewey

    $162,500  $325,001  $  650,002  ---    ---    ---    ---    ---    ---    ---    $ 320,000  $ 640,000  $   1,280,000   ---   ---   ---   ---  --- ---  --- 
 2/16/2022   ---   ---   ---  2,143  12,244  24,488   ---  --- --- $399,607 
   2/19/2020   ---    ---    ---      947    5,413  10,826  ---    ---    ---    $173,092 2/16/2022   ---   ---   ---   ---   ---   ---  12,244  --- --- $400,134 
   2/19/2020   ---    ---    ---    ---    ---    ---      5,413  ---    ---    $173,162

Louis E. Greer

    $100,000  $200,000  $  400,000  ---    ---    ---    ---    ---    ---    ---  
   2/19/2020   ---    ---    ---      541    3,094    6,188  ---    ---    ---    $  98,937

Thomas C. Owens

  $ 100,000  $ 200,000  $      400,000   ---   ---   ---   ---  --- ---  --- 
   2/19/2020   ---    ---    ---    ---    ---    ---      3,093  ---    ---    $  98,945 2/16/2022   ---   ---   ---  670  3,827  7,654   ---  --- --- $124,902 
 2/16/2022   ---   ---   ---   ---   ---   ---  3,826  --- --- $125,034 

Robert B. Harvey

    $  91,035  $182,070  $  364,140  ---    ---    ---    ---    ---    ---    ---     $ 122,400   $ 244,800   $      489,600   ---   ---   ---   ---  --- ---  --- 
  2/16/2022   ---   ---   ---   670   3,827   7,654   ---  --- --- $124,902 
   2/19/2020   ---    ---    ---      541    3,094    6,188  ---    ---    ---    $  98,937  2/16/2022   ---   ---   ---   ---   ---   ---   3,826  --- --- $125,034 

Wayne A. Stevens

   $ 100,573   $ 201,145   $      402,290   ---   ---   ---   ---  --- ---  --- 
  2/16/2022   ---   ---   ---   670   3,827   7,654   ---  --- --- $124,902 
   2/19/2020   ---    ---    ---    ---    ---    ---      3,093  ---    ---    $  98,945  2/16/2022   ---   ---   ---   ---   ---   ---   3,826  --- --- $125,034 

Breck W. Tyler

    $  64,946  $129,892  $  259,784  ---    ---    ---    ---    ---    ---    ---  

Granville Tate, Jr.

   $ 122,400   $ 244,800   $      489,600   ---   ---   ---   ---  --- ---  --- 
  2/16/2022   ---   ---   ---   670   3,827   7,654   ---  --- --- $124,902 
    ---    ---    $  300,000  ---    ---    ---    ---    ---    ---    ---    2/16/2022   ---   ---   ---   ---   ---   ---   3,826  --- --- $125,034 
   2/19/2020   ---    ---    ---      325    1,856    3,712  ---    ---    ---    $  59,349
   2/19/2020   ---    ---    ---    ---    ---    ---      1,856  ---    ---    $  59,373

 

 (1)

The amounts shown in these columns reflect possible payouts under the annual management incentive plan for 2020.2022. The minimum possible payment level (threshold) was 50% of the target amount shown, and the maximum possible payment was 200% of the target. All of these amounts are percentages of the executive’s base salary as of March 1, 2020.2022. The amount of the award actually earned by the NEOs was recommended by the Committee on February 16, 202114, 2023 and approved by the Board on February 17, 2021. For Mr. Tyler, the amounts shown in the second row reflect the maximum amount he can earn annually under a quarterly production incentive based on the mortgage department’s origination, above a threshold production level, of mortgages that conform to the Bank’s mortgage origination guidelines. The production incentive does not have a threshold or target level.15, 2023. Amounts actually earned for 20202022 are reported as Non- EquityNon-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation in the “Summary Compensation Table for 2020”2022” on page 29.30.

 (2)

Reflects the performance unitsperformance-based restricted stock and achievement unitsrestricted stock unit awards granted on February 19, 2020.16, 2022. For a description of the vesting conditions and other features of the performanceperformance-based restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards, please see “Equity-Based Compensation” beginning on page 23.25.

 (3)

Reflects the number of shares of time-based unitsrestricted stock granted on February 19, 2020.16, 2022. For a description of the vesting conditions and other features of the time-based units,restricted stock, please see “Equity-Based Compensation” beginning on page 23.25.

 (4)

The amounts in this column reflect the grant date fair value of the performance unitsperformance-based restricted stock and achievement unitsrestricted stock unit awards computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718, in each case based on the then-anticipated outcome and the grant date fair value of the time-based unitsrestricted stock computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718.

32


Outstanding Equity Awards at 20202022 Fiscal Year-End

The following table presents information regarding unvested equity awards held by NEOs at December 31, 2020.2022. All awards in the table below were granted under the Amended and Restated Stock Plan. None of the NEOs held any unexercised options at December 31, 2020.2022.

 

  Stock Awards
             Equity Incentive
          Equity Incentive  Plan Awards:
          Plan Awards:  Market or Payout
    Number of  Market Value of  Number of  Value of Unearned
    Shares or Units of  Shares or Units of  Unearned Shares, Units  Shares, Units or Other
    Stock That Have  Stock That Have  or Other Rights That  Rights That Have Not
    Not Vested (1)   Not Vested (2)   Have Not Vested (1)   Vested (2)      Stock Awards
Name  Grant Date  (#)   ($)    (#)   ($) Grant Date    

Number of

  Shares or Units of  

Stock That Have

Not Vested (1)

(#)

 

Market Value of

  Shares or Units of  

Stock That Have

Not Vested (2)

($)

 

Equity Incentive

Plan Awards:

Number of

  Unearned Shares, Units  

or Other Rights That

Have Not Vested (1)

(#)

 

Equity Incentive

Plan Awards:

Market or Payout

Value of Unearned

  Shares, Units or Other  

Rights That Have Not

Vested (2)

($)

Gerard R. Host

    2/15/2018 (3)  12,829   $350,360    ---       ---      
    2/15/2018 (4)  ---       ---          11,995   $327,583
    2/14/2019 (3)  12,232    334,056    ---       ---      
    2/14/2019 (5)  ---       ---          12,233    334,083
    2/19/2020 (3)  12,372    337,879    ---       ---      
    2/19/2020 (6)  ---       ---          12,373    337,907
     37,433   $ 1,022,295    36,601   $999,573

Duane A. Dewey

    2/15/2018 (3)  3,207   $87,583    ---       ---       2/19/2020 (3)     5,413         188,968           ---           ---           
 2/19/2020 (4)     ---   ---   5,129   179,053 
    2/15/2018 (4)  ---       ---          2,999   $81,903 1/4/2021   (3)     11,079   386,768   ---   --- 
 2/17/2021 (3)     10,145   354,162   ---   --- 
    2/14/2019 (3)  4,587    125,271    ---       ---       2/17/2021 (5) ��   ---   ---   10,146   354,197 
 2/16/2022 (3)     12,244   427,438   ---   --- 
    2/14/2019 (5)  ---       ---          4,588    125,298 2/16/2022 (6)     ---   ---   12,244   427,438 
      38,881      $    1,357,336   27,519      $960,688 
    2/19/2020 (3)  5,413    147,829    ---       ---      
    2/19/2020 (6)  ---       ---          5,413    147,829
     13,207   $360,683    13,000   $355,030

Louis E. Greer

    2/15/2018 (3)  3,207   $87,583    ---       ---      
    2/15/2018 (4)  ---       ---          2,999   $81,903
    2/14/2019 (3)  3,058    83,514    ---       ---      
    2/14/2019 (5)  ---       ---          3,059    83,541

Thomas C. Owens

 2/19/2020 (3)     1,856   64,793   ---   --- 
 2/19/2020 (4)     ---   ---   1,759   61,407 
    2/19/2020 (3)  3,093    84,470    ---       ---       2/17/2021 (3)     3,382   118,066   ---   --- 
 2/17/2021 (5)     ---   ---   3,382   118,066 
    2/19/2020 (6)  ---       ---          3,094    84,497 3/1/2021   (3)     3,256   113,667   ---   --- 
 2/16/2022 (3)     3,826   133,566   ---   --- 
     9,358   $255,567    9,152   $249,941 2/16/2022 (6)     ---   ---   3,827   133,601 
      12,320      $430,092   8,968      $313,074 

Robert B. Harvey

    2/15/2018 (3)  3,207   $87,583    ---       ---       2/19/2020 (3)     3,093   107,977   ---   --- 
 2/19/2020 (4)     ---   ---   2,932   102,356 
    2/15/2018 (4)  ---       ---          2,999   $81,903 2/17/2021 (3)     3,382   118,066   ---   --- 
 2/17/2021 (5)     ---   ---   3,382   118,066 
    2/14/2019 (3)  3,058    83,514    ---       ---       2/16/2022 (3)     3,826   133,566   ---   --- 
 2/16/2022 (6)     ---   ---   3,827   133,601 
    2/14/2019 (5)  ---       ---          3,059    83,541      10,301      $359,609   10,141      $354,023 

Wayne A. Stevens

 2/19/2020 (3)     3,093   107,977   ---   --- 
 2/19/2020 (4)     ---   ---   2,932   102,356 
 2/17/2021 (3)     3,382   118,066   ---   --- 
 2/17/2021 (5)     ---   ---   3,382   118,066 
 2/16/2022 (3)     3,826   133,566   ---   --- 
 2/16/2022 (6)     ---   ---   3,827   133,601 
      10,301      $359,609   10,141      $354,023 

Granville Tate, Jr.

 2/19/2020 (3)     3,093   107,977   ---   --- 
 2/19/2020 (4)     ---   ---   2,932   102,356 
    2/19/2020 (3)  3,093    84,470    ---       ---       1/4/2021   (3)     7,386   257,845   ---   --- 
 2/17/2021 (3)     3,382   118,066   ---   --- 
    2/19/2020 (6)  ---       ---          3,094    84,497 2/17/2021 (5)     ---   ---   3,382   118,066 
 2/16/2022 (3)     3,826   133,566   ---   --- 
     9,358   $255,567    9,152   $ 249,941 2/16/2022 (6)     ---   ---   3,827   133,601 
      17,687      $617,454   10,141      $354,023 

Breck W. Tyler

    2/15/2018 (3)  1,924   $52,544    ---       ---      
    2/15/2018 (4)  ---       ---          1,800   $49,158
    2/14/2019 (3)  1,835    50,114    ---       ---      
    2/14/2019 (5)  ---       ---          1,835    50,114
    2/19/2020 (3)  1,856    50,687    ---       ---      
    2/19/2020 (6)  ---       ---          1,856    50,687
     5,615   $153,345    5,491   $149,959

 

 (1)

Dividends on the restricted shares are accumulated, vest and are paid only when and to the extent the underlying restricted shares vest, subject to a six-month delay when required by Section 409A. No interest is paid on accumulated dividends. No dividend equivalents are accumulated on the achievement units.units over 100% vesting of performance restricted stock. Accelerated vesting of these shares and units may occur based on the executive’s death, disability, retirement at or after age 65 with consent of the Committee and where cause for termination is not present, termination by Trustmark without cause, termination by the executive for good reason if provided in the executive’s employment agreement or a change in control.

 (2)

The market value of shares or units that have not vested is the number of reported shares or units, as applicable, multiplied by the closing market price of Trustmark’s common stock on December 31, 2020,2022 which was $27.31$34.91 per share.

 (3)

Reflects time-based restricted stock and restricted units granted, which vests 100% on the third anniversary of the grant date, if the executive remains employed through such date. See footnote (1) above for information regarding dividend accumulation and the events that may trigger partial time-weighted accelerated vesting with respect to these shares.

33


 (4)

For awards granted on February 15, 2018,19, 2020, reflects the number of performance-based restricted sharesperformance units that vested under the award on February 16, 2021.14, 2023. The vesting percentages of the performance-based restricted stockperformance units and potential restricted stockachievement units are based on performance goals of a three-year average of Trustmark’s ROATEROATCE compared to a target level and TSR which is compared to a defined peer group. Because of the achievement of thea performance-based vesting level with respect to the ROATEROATCE and TSR targets wasof less than 100% in the aggregate (93.5%(94.75% out of a maximum of 200%), no additional sharesachievement units were issued. Also see footnote (1) above for information regarding dividend accumulation on the restricted shares.

 (5)

For awards granted on February 14, 2019,17, 2021, reflects the target (100%) number of performance-based restricted sharesperformance units granted. The awards vest over a January 1, 2019,2021, through December 31, 2021,2023, performance period. Vesting percentagesFor a description of the performance-based restricted stockvesting conditions and other features of the performance units and potential achievement units, are basedplease see “Equity-Based Compensation” beginning on performance goals of a three-year average of Trustmark’s ROATE compared to a target level and TSR which is compared to a defined peer group.page 25. Also see footnote (1) above for information regarding dividend accumulation on the restricted shares and the events that may trigger partial time-weighted performance vesting.

 (6)

For awards granted on February 19, 2020,16, 2022 reflects the target (100%) number of performance units granted. The awards vest over a January 1, 2020,2022, through December 31, 2022,2024, performance period. For a description of the vesting conditions and other features of the performance-based restricted stockperformance units and restricted stock unit awards,potential achievement units, please see “Equity-Based Compensation” beginning on page 23.25. Also see footnote (1) above for information regarding dividend accumulation on the restricted shares and the events that may trigger partial time-weighted performance vesting.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested for 20202022

The following table presents information regarding restricted stock that vested during 20202022 for each of the NEOs. None of the NEOs held or exercised options during 2020.2022.

 

  Stock Awards      Stock Awards     
Name  

Number of Shares

Acquired on Vesting (1)

(#)

      

Value Realized

on Vesting (2) 

($)

      

Number of Shares

            Acquired on Vesting (1)            

(#)

 

            

  

Value Realized

on Vesting (2)

($)

  

                

 

Gerard R. Host

    15,893      $508,398                

Duane A. Dewey

    3,668                       $117,335     6,523 $  212,603  

Louis E. Greer

    3,668      $117,335   

Thomas C. Owens

  2,609 $  85,035  

Robert B. Harvey

    3,668      $117,335     4,349 $  141,746  

Breck W. Tyler

    2,935      $93,887   

Wayne A. Stevens

  4,349 $  141,746  

Granville Tate, Jr.

  4,349 $  141,746  

 

(1)

Represents the total number of restricted shares that vested during 2020,2022, without taking into account any shares that were surrendered or withheld for applicable tax obligations.

(2)

Value realized is the gross number of shares multiplied by the market price of Trustmark’s common stock on the date of vesting.

Pension Benefits for 20202022

The Executive Deferral Plan is discussed in more detail under “Executive Deferral Plan” on page 25.27.

The following table shows the present value at December 31, 2020,2022, of accumulated benefits payable to each NEO, including the number of years of service credited, under the Executive Deferral Plan, determined using interest rate and mortality rate assumptions included in Note 1514 to Trustmark’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020,2022, in Trustmark’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 18, 2021.16, 2023.

 

Name          Plan Name  

Number of Years

Credited Service (1)

(#)

 

Present Value of

Accumulated Benefit (2)(3)

($)

 

Payments During

Last Fiscal Year (4)

($)

              Plan Name              

Number of Years

    Credited Service (1)    

(#)

  

Present Value of

Accumulated Benefit (2)(3)

($)

  

    Payments During    

Last Fiscal Year

($)

Gerard R. Host

  Executive Deferral Plan    28 $ 5,297,737  ---  

Duane A. Dewey

  Executive Deferral Plan    17 $ 1,584,830  ---    Executive Deferral Plan  19  $        1,220,573          ---

Louis E. Greer

  Executive Deferral Plan    22 $  1,630,226  ---  

Thomas C. Owens

  Executive Deferral Plan  ---               ---  ---

Robert B. Harvey

  Executive Deferral Plan    15 $  1,422,618  ---    Executive Deferral Plan  17  $        1,127,865          ---

Breck W. Tyler

  Executive Deferral Plan    20 $  1,465,968  ---  

Wayne A. Stevens

  Executive Deferral Plan  19  $           856,104          ---

Granville Tate, Jr.

  Executive Deferral Plan  ---               ---  ---

 

(1)

This column reflects years of participation in the Executive Deferral Plan. Benefits accrue during a specified vesting period, which may be less that the years of credited service shown above.

(2)

Excludes amounts under the Executive Deferral Plan which Messrs. Harvey and TylerStevens would not currently be entitled to receive because such amounts are not vested. In connection with a previous increase in their annual retirement benefits, they become vested in the increased amount over time through the year each attainsthey attain age 64.

(3)

The present value of accumulated benefit is the discounted value of the vested annual benefit payable at retirement age as of December 31, 2020.2022.

 

(4)

Mr. Host became eligible to receive benefit payments under the Executive Deferral Plan on September 1, 2019. The plan provides that payments shall be deferred if such payments would not be deductible under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. As a result, all payments due to Mr. Host in 2019 and 2020 were deferred.

34


Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation for 20202022

The NQDC Plan is discussed in more detail under “Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan” on page 26.27. The following table presents information relating to each NEO’s participation in the plan:

 

  Executive  Trustmark  Aggregate  Aggregate    Aggregate Balance  
  Contributions in  Contributions in  Earnings in  Withdrawals/  at Last Fiscal
  Last Fiscal Year (1)  Last Fiscal Year  Last Fiscal Year (2)  Distributions  Year-End (3)
Name  ($)  ($)  ($)  ($)  ($)  

Executive

Contributions in

Last Fiscal Year (1)

($)

   

Trustmark

Contributions in

Last Fiscal Year

($)

  

Aggregate

Earnings in

Last Fiscal Year (2)

($)

 

Aggregate

Withdrawals/

Distributions

($)

  

Aggregate Balance

at Last Fiscal

Year-End (3)

($)

 

Gerard R. Host

  $  630,229  ---  $1,119,547  ---  $  8,836,000

Duane A. Dewey

  $    59,886  ---  $     41,725  $ (96,842)  $     365,894  $123,972         ---      $(89,708)      ---  $552,847       

Louis E. Greer

  $  100,000  ---  $     35,409  ---  $     263,849

Thomas C. Owens

   ---         ---   ---  ---   ---       

Robert B. Harvey

  ---  ---  $    142,387  ---  $     859,314   ---         ---      $(239,693)          ---  $685,411       

Breck W. Tyler

  ---  ---  $    312,800  ---  $  2,074,393

Wayne A. Stevens

  $68,833         ---      $(71,864)          ---  $434,316       

Granville Tate, Jr.

   ---         ---      $(84,006)          ---  $463,248       

 

(1)

These amounts are included in the “Summary Compensation Table for 2020”2022” on page 29.30.

(2)

The amounts in this column consist of investment gains and losses for 20202022 and do not include any above-market earnings.

(3)

Of the amounts disclosed in this column, the following amounts were previously reported as compensation to the NEO in a summary compensation table prior to 2020: Host -- $4,657,965,2022: Dewey -- $218,045, Greer$375,026 and Stevens -- $57,500 and Tyler -- $458,158.$183,884.

35


Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

The following table describes the potential payments that would be made to each of the NEOs in various termination and change in control scenarios based on compensation, benefit and equity levels in effect on December 31, 2020.2022. The amounts shown are estimates and assume that the termination or change in control event occurred on December 31, 2020.2022. The actual amounts to be paid can only be determined at the time of an NEO’s actual termination of employment or an actual change in control of Trustmark.

In accordance with SEC regulations, the following table does not report any amount to be provided to an NEO that does not discriminate in scope, terms or operation in favor of Trustmark’s executive officers and which is available generally to all salaried employees, and excludes (i) amounts accrued through December 31, 2020,2022, that would be paid in the normal course of continued employment, such as accrued but unpaid salary and bonus amounts, (ii) vested account balances under the Executive Deferral Plan, NQDC Plan and 401(k) plan, and (iii) already vested equity awards.

The amounts shown for Mr. Host and Mr. Dewey in the table below are determined based on their respectivehis employment agreement and change in control agreement in effect as of December 31, 2020,2022, and references to such agreementsagreement in the footnotes below refer to the agreementsagreement in effect as of December 31, 2020. Effective January 1, 2021, Mr. Host and Mr. Dewey entered into new employment agreements, and Mr. Dewey’s change in control agreement was terminated.2022. For a description of the prior agreements and the newhis employment agreements,agreement, please see

“Employment “Employment and Change in Control Agreements with NEOs” beginning on page 36.40.

 

  Name Incremental Compensation and Benefit Payments  

Non-CIC

Termination by Company

Without Cause or

by Executive for Good

Reason under

Agreement

  

CIC

    Termination by Company    

Without Cause or

by Executive for Good

    Reason under     

Agreement (1)

Gerard R. Host (2)

 Severance (3)  ---  $ 1,549,782
 Covenant Payment (3)(4)  $ 3,099,564  3,099,564
 Restricted Stock -- Accelerated Vesting (5)  1,306,328  1,306,328
 Executive Deferral Plan  ---  —  
 Health & Welfare Benefits (8)        71,306       106,959
 Totals  $ 4,477,198  $ 6,062,633

Duane A. Dewey

 Severance (3)  ---  $ 1,456,446
 Covenant Payment  ---  —  
 Restricted Stock -- Accelerated Vesting (5)  $ 472,133       472,133
 Executive Deferral Plan (6)  ---  —  
 Health & Welfare Benefits (8)  ---        49,883
 Totals  $ 472,133  $ 1,978,462

Louis E. Greer

 Severance (3)  ---  $ 1,195,650
 Covenant Payment  ---  —  
 Restricted Stock -- Accelerated Vesting (5)  $ 326,633       326,633
 Executive Deferral Plan  ---  —  
 Health & Welfare Benefits (8)  ---        40,167
 Totals  $ 326,633  $ 1,562,450

Robert B. Harvey

 Severance (3)  ---  $ 1,091,528
 Covenant Payment  ---  —  
 Restricted Stock -- Accelerated Vesting (5)  $ 326,633       326,633
 Executive Deferral Plan (6)(7)  ---       129,323
 Health & Welfare Benefits (8)  ---        26,877
 Totals  $ 326,633  $ 1,574,361

Breck W. Tyler

 Severance (3)  ---  $   870,944
 Covenant Payment  ---  —  
 Restricted Stock -- Accelerated Vesting (5)  $ 196,002       196,002
 Executive Deferral Plan (6)(7)  ---       118,862
 Health & Welfare Benefits (8)  ---        55,562
 Totals  $ 196,002  $ 1,241,370
  Name Incremental Compensation and Benefit Payments  

Non-CIC

  Termination by Company  

Without Cause or

by Executive for Good

Reason under

Agreement

     

CIC

Termination by Company

Without Cause or

by Executive for Good

Reason under

Agreement (1)

 

Duane A. Dewey (2)                                

 Severance (3)   ---                    $        1,328,858               
 Covenant Payment (3)     $2,657,716                  2,657,716               
 Restricted Stock -- Accelerated Vesting (4)   1,440,725                  2,021,336               
 Executive Deferral Plan (5)(6)   ---                  ---               
 Health & Welfare Benefits (7)   70,752                  106,128               
 Totals     $            4,169,193                    $6,114,038               

Thomas C. Owens

 Severance (3)   ---                    $1,267,310               
 Covenant Payment   ---                  ---               
 Restricted Stock -- Accelerated Vesting (4)     $460,971                  649,454               
 Executive Deferral Plan (6)   ---                  ---               
 Health & Welfare Benefits (7)   ---                  36,420               
 Totals     $460,971                    $1,953,184               

Robert B. Harvey

 Severance (3)   ---                    $1,421,898               
 Covenant Payment   ---                  ---               
 Restricted Stock -- Accelerated Vesting (4)     $479,791                  623,029               
 Executive Deferral Plan (5)(6)   ---                  32,227               
 Health & Welfare Benefits (7)   ---                  36,438               
 Totals     $479,791                    $2,113,592               

Wayne A. Stevens

 Severance (3)   ---                    $1,392,042               
 Covenant Payment   ---                  ---               
 Restricted Stock -- Accelerated Vesting (4)     $479,791                  623,029               
 Executive Deferral Plan (5)(6)   ---                  79,266               
 Health & Welfare Benefits (7)   ---                  47,984               
 Totals     $479,791                    $2,142,321               

Granville Tate, Jr.

 Severance (3)   ---                    $1,485,730               
 Covenant Payment   ---                  ---               
 Restricted Stock -- Accelerated Vesting (4)     $660,748                  894,464               
 Executive Deferral Plan (6)   ---                  ---               
 Health & Welfare Benefits (7)   ---                  38,835               
 Totals     $660,748                    $2,419,029               

 

(1)

Mr. Host’sDewey’s employment agreement and the other NEOs’ change in control agreements provide for change in control benefits on a “best net” approach, under which the executive’s change in control benefits will be reduced to avoid the golden parachute excise tax under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code only if such a reduction would cause the executive to receive more after-tax compensation than without a reduction. The amounts shown in this column do not reflect any reduction that might be made in this regard.

(2)

If during the term of his employment agreement, Mr. Host’sDewey’s employment is terminated due to disability or if he dies, he or his designated beneficiary, spouse or estate will be entitled to a lump sum payment of a time-weighted pro-rata share of his annual bonus target amount for that year ($725,382640,000 for 2020)2022), in addition to accrued but unpaid compensation to date of termination.

(3)

The executive must sign a general release in order to be entitled to receive these amounts. In the case of the NEOs other than Mr. Host,Dewey, Trustmark has the right to retain these amounts if the executive breaches the confidentiality, non-solicitation or non-competition covenants contained in the executive’s change in control agreement.

(4)

Payments pursuant to Mr. Host’s employment agreement in consideration of covenants relating to confidentiality and two-year non-solicitation and non-competition commitments, with one-half of the payment paid in 12 equal monthly installments and one-half paid in a lump sum.

(5)

Upon a change in control without termination of employment, or upon death or disability, retirement at or after age 65 with consent of the Committee and where cause for termination is not present, termination by Trustmark not for cause or termination by the executive for good reason if provided in the executive’s employment agreement, the executive is entitled to accelerated vesting of a pro-rata portion of his unvested restricted stock and achievement units and a pro-rata portion of time-based restricted stock units (plus accumulated dividends attributable to the shares of restricted stock vesting), based on actual service in the case of

36


time-based restricted stock and actual service and actual performance in the case of performance-based restricted stock and achievement units. Upon a change in control without termination of employment, or retirement at or after age 65 with consent of the Committee and where cause for termination is not present, the executive is entitled to accelerated vesting of a pro-rata portion of his unvested performance-based restricted stock and achievement units and 100% of time-based restricted stock units (plus accumulated dividends attributable to the shares of restricted stock vesting), based on actual service in the case of time-based restricted stock and actual service and actual performance in the case of performance-based restricted stock and achievement units. The value of the restricted stock and achievement units upon vesting is based on the closing market price per share of $ 27.31$34.91 as of December 31, 2020,2022, plus the amount of accumulated cash dividends attributable to the shares of restricted stock vesting.

(6)  (5)

Upon death, an incremental pre-retirement death benefit may be payable to the executive’s beneficiary under the Executive Deferral Plan.

(7)  (6)

Upon termination within three years following a change in control, the executive is entitled to accelerated vesting of a portion of his unvested benefit under the Executive Deferral Plan by adding up to five years of service to the executive’s service under the plan. The incremental benefit amount shown in this column is equal to the present value of the amount of the benefit for which vesting would have been accelerated in connection with such a termination as of December 31, 2020.2022. The actuarial assumptions used to calculate the incremental benefit are the same as the assumptions in the “Pension Benefits for 2020”2022” table using a 1.95%4.88% rate for present value computations. Messrs. Host, Greer andMr. Dewey werewas already fully vested as of December 31, 2020,2022, and would not have received any incremental benefits from this provision. Messrs. Harvey and Tyler eachStevens would have received the incremental benefits shown in the table in connection with the unvested portions of the previous increase in theirhis annual retirement benefit. Messrs. Owens and Tate do not have benefits under the Executive Deferral Plan.

(8)  (7)

Mr. HostDewey is entitled to 24 months of continuing medical, dental, vision and group life coverage on the same premium cost sharing basis as prior to termination if his employment is terminated by Trustmark without cause or if he resigns for good reason, and 36 months of continuing medical, dental, vision and group life coverage on the same premium cost sharing basis as prior to termination upon such events in the case of a change in control. The other NEOs are entitled to 18 months of continuing medical, dental, vision and group life coverage on the same premium cost sharing basis as prior to termination if within two years after a change in control the executive’s employment is terminated by Trustmark other than due to death, disability or for cause or if he resigns for good reason.

Human Resources Committee Report

The Human Resources Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K, and based on such review and discussions, the Human Resources Committee, as listed below, recommended to the Audit & Finance Committee, acting on behalf of the Board, that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.

 

Adolphus B. Baker (Chair)

  

Harris V. Morrissette

J. Clay Hays, Jr. M.D.

  

Richard H. Puckett

Human Resources Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

No current or former executive officer or associate of Trustmark or any of its subsidiaries currently serves or has served as a member of the Human Resources Committee or has been involved in any related party transaction as discussed in the section beginning on page 43.45.

20202022 Pay Ratio Disclosure

For 2020,2022, the ratio of the total compensation of Trustmark’s CEO to the total compensation of Trustmark’s median employee was 6050 to 1. To calculate this ratio, Trustmark identified its median employee as of December 31, 20202021 based on employees’ gross earnings, less before-tax benefit deductions, as reported in Box 5 of the United States Internal Revenue Service Form W-2. Compensation was annualized for employees who worked less than a full year, and compensation for part-time employees was annualized but not converted into a full-time equivalent. Trustmark used the same median employee in 2022 as in 2021, based on its determination that there were no material changes to its employee population or compensation arrangements reasonably likely to result in a change in the ratio. Once identified, the median employee’s total compensation for 20202022 was determined in accordance with Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K to be $60,154,$54,942, as compared to total compensation of $3,616,342$2,739,279 for Trustmark’s CEO.

37


Pay-Versus-Performance
The following table presents certain information regarding compensation paid to Trustmark’s CEO and other NEOs, and certain measures
of
financial performance, for the three years ended December 31, 2022. The amounts shown below are
cal
culated in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation
S-K.
Year
 
Summary
Compensation
Table Total
for CEO
($)
 
Compensation
Actually Paid
to CEO
(1)
($)
 
Average
Summary
Compensation
Table Total
for
non-CEO
Named
Executive
Officers
($)
 
Average
Compensation
Actually Paid
to
non-CEO
Named
Executive
Officers
(2)
($)
   
Value of Initial Fixed $100      
Investment Based on:      
 
Net
Income 
(4)
($in thousands)
($)
 
ROATE
(5)
    
(%)    
    
Trustmark
Total
Shareholder
Return
($)
 
S&P 500
Regional
Banks Total
Shareholder
Return
(3)
($)
          
2022 $2,739,279 $2,810,846
(6)
 $1,047,684 $1,056,136
(9)
   $111.19 $99.93 $71,887 12.12%
          
2021 $2,472,426 $2,666,493(7
)
 $1,151,155 $1,222,268
(10)
   $100.46 $134.16 $147,365 11.45%
          
2020 $3,616,342 $2,317,370
(8)
 $1,277,423 $948,065(
11)
   $82.09 $95.47 $160,025 12.81%
(1)
Mr. Dewey served as CEO during 2021 and 2022. Mr. Host was CEO for 2020.
(2)
In 2022, the other NEOs were Messrs. Owen, Harvey, Stevens and Tate. In 2021, the other NEOs were Messrs. Owens, Host, Harvey, Tate and Louis E. Greer (former CFO). In 2020, the other NEOs were Messrs. Dewey, Greer, Harvey, and Breck Tyler.
(3)
Market index used for this column is S&P 500 – Regional Banks.
(4)
Net income for 2022 includes a reduction of $75.6 million (after tax) related to the Stanford settlement.
(5)
Return on average tangible equity (ROATE) is calculated using net income adjusted for intangible amortization divided by total average tangible common equity (total shareholders’ equity less goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets); it excludes the impact of (i) restructurings, discontinued operations, extraordinary items and other significant
non-routine
transactions, (ii) material litigation and insurance settlements, (iii) changes to comply with ASU
2016-02
and ASU
2016-13,
and (iv) cumulative effects of income tax and accounting changes in accordance with US GAAP. The amount shown for 2022 excludes the effect of the Stanford settlement.
(6)
To calculate the compensation “actually paid” to CEO for 2022, the Stock Awards value in the Summary Compensation Table (SCT) was deducted ($799,741) and an amount equal to $871,308 was added, representing the result of the stock calculations required by Item 402(v)(2)(iii)(C) of Regulation
S-K.
(7)
To calculate the compensation “actually paid” to CEO for 2021, the Stock Awards value in the SCT was deducted ($909,128) and an amount equal to $1,103,195 was added, representing the result of the stock calculations required by Item 402(v)(2)(iii)(C) of Regulation
S-K.
(8)
To calculate the compensation “actually paid” to CEO for 2020, the Stock Awards value ($791,431) and the Change in Pension Value ($638,447) in the SCT were deducted and an amount equal to $130,906 was added, representing the result of the stock calculations required by Item 402(v)(2)(iii)(C) of Regulation
S-K.
(9)
To calculate the compensation “actually paid” to other NEOs for 2022, the Stock Awards value in the SCT was deducted (average $249,936), the service cost related to the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan was added (average $9,803) and an amount equal to $248,584 (average) was added, representing the result of the stock calculations required by Item 402(v)(2)(iii)(C) of Regulation
S-K.
(10)
To calculate the compensation “actually paid” to other NEOs for 2021, the Stock Awards value in the SCT was deducted (average $405,875), the service cost related to the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan was added ($7,023 average) and an amount equal to $469,964 (average) was added, representing the result of the stock calculations required by Item 402(v)(2)(iii)(C) of Regulation
S-K.
(11)
To calculate the compensation “actually paid” to other NEOs for 2020, the Stock Awards value (average $215,185) and the Change in Pension Value (average $188,344) in the SCT were deducted, the service cost related to the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan was added (average $14,868) and an amount equal to $59,302 (average) was added, representing the result of the stock calculations required by Item 402(v)(2)(iii)(C) of Regulation
S-K.
Relationship Between Pay and Performance.
Actually Paid versus Company Performance
.
The relationship between compensation actually paid and Trustmark’s financial performance over the three-year period shown in the table above is described in the following bullet points.
CEO
·
From 2021 to 2022, compensation actually paid to the CEO increased by $144,353 or 5.4%. Over this same period, the company’s TSR increased by 10.7%, net income decreased by 51.2%, and ROATE increased by 5.9%. Net income for 2022 includes a reduction of $75.6 million (after tax) related to the Stanford settlement; excluding this charge, net income for 2022 would have been $147.5 million. Some key factors that drove the changes in compensation actually paid during this CEO’s second year were an increase in salary, an increase in annual MIP bonus, and a decrease in stock value due to the CEO receiving a
one-time
award in the prior year as part of his initial transition to CEO.
·
From 2020 to 2021, compensation actually paid to the CEO increased by $349,123 or 15.1%. Over this same period, the company’s TSR increased by 22.4%, net income decreased by 7.9%, and ROATE decreased by 10.6%. Some key factors that drove the changes in compensation actually paid were the transition to the new first-year CEO during 2021, which represented a traditional compensation decrease in salary, MIP bonus, and equity awards. However, the addition of a
one-time
transition equity grant for the new CEO and the positive TSR performance for the company in 2021 impacted the CEO stock values, creating the overall increase as shown in the table.
38

Other NEOs
·From 2021 to 2022, compensation actually paid to the other NEOs decreased by $166,132 or 13.6%. Over this same period, the company’s TSR increased by 10.7%, net income decreased by 51.2%, and ROATE increased by 5.9%. Net income for 2022 includes a reduction of $75.6 million (after tax), related to the Stanford settlement; without this charge, net income for 2022 would have been $147.5 million. Some key factors that drove the decrease in pay over this period were leadership transitions within the NEO group, including a full year of service by the Executive Chairman in 2021 and only four months of service by the Executive Chairman in 2022, creating an expanded average when compared to the more traditional NEO levels in 2022.
·
From 2020 to 2021, compensation actually paid to the other NEOs increased by $274,203 or 28.9%. Over this same period, the company’s TSR increased by 22.4%, net income decreased by 7.9%, and ROATE decreased by 10.6%. Some key factors that drove the changes in pay included the impact of leadership transitions within the NEO group, as well as
one-time
equity grants for two NEOs, and the positive TSR performance for the company in 2021 impacting stock values, creating the majority of the overall increase as shown in the table.
Company TSR versus S&P 500 Regional Banks TSR
.
The relationship between the company’s TSR and the TSR of S&P 500 Regional Banks index is shown below:
Comparison of Total Shareholder Return
Assumes Initial Investment of $100
Tabular List of Financial Performance Measures.
Trustmark considers the following to be
the
mos
t important
financial performance measures it uses to link compensation actually paid to its NEOs, for 2022, to company performance.
·ROATE
·EPS
·Efficiency Ratio
·
Non-Performing
Assets/total loans + ORE, excluding PPP loans
·
Non-Interest
Expense (Core)
39


Employment and Change in Control Agreements with NEOs

Employment Agreements with Mr. Host.In connection with his election as President and CEO of Trustmark and the Bank, Trustmark and Mr. Host entered into an employment agreement, effective January 1, 2011 (the First Host Agreement). This agreement was subsequently amended effective February 15, 2018 (the First Amendment) and amended a second time, effective December 10, 2019 (the Second Amendment). Pursuant to the Second Amendment, Mr. Host ceased serving as President of the Bank, effective January 1, 2020.

The First Host Agreement terminated upon Mr. Host’s retirement as President and CEO of Trustmark and CEO of the Bank on December 31, 2020. On October 27, 2020 Trustmark and Mr. Host entered into a new employment agreement, effective January 1, 2021 (the Second Host Agreement) in connection with Mr. Host’s appointment as Executive Chairman of Trustmark and the Bank.

First Host Agreement. Pursuant to the First Host Agreement, Mr. Host was guaranteed a minimum base salary of $550,000 annually, subject to annual review.

The First Host Agreement provided that Mr. Host was eligible to earn an annual cash bonus, with a bonus target amount of 90% of his base salary. Mr. Host was also eligible to receive equity compensation awards on such basis as the Committee determines and was eligible to participate in any benefit plans or programs that are offered to senior executives generally.

On any cessation of employment, Mr. Host was entitled to his earned but unpaid base salary and annual bonus and, except in the case of termination for Cause (as defined in the First Host Agreement), any accrued vacation (earned compensation). Mr. Host was entitled to additional severance benefits in the event his employment ends as a result of his death or disability, or in the event his employment was terminated by Trustmark without Cause whether in connection with a change in control of Trustmark or not, or in the event Mr. Host resigned for Good Reason (as defined in the First Host Agreement) whether in connection with a change in control of Trustmark or not.

Under the First Host Agreement, Mr. Host was subject to standard confidentiality, non-solicitation and non-competition obligations during the term of the First Host Agreement and for two years after his employment ends. As partial consideration for these obligations after his employment ends, if Mr. Host’s employment was terminated by Trustmark without Cause or if he resigned for Good Reason, he would have been entitled to payments equal to two times the sum of (i) his annual base salary, and (ii) the average of his annual bonuses earned for the three years prior to the end of his employment (the Covenant Payments), with one-half of the Covenant Payments paid in 12 equal monthly installments commencing 60 days after termination and one-half paid in a lump sum 60 days after termination.

If Mr. Host’s employment was terminated by Trustmark without Cause or he resigned for Good Reason, in each case within two years after a change in control, he would have been entitled to the following benefits in addition to the Covenant Payments and earned compensation: (i) a lump sum payment equal to one times his base salary and the average of his annual bonuses earned for the three years prior to the change in control, (ii) thirty-six months of continuing medical, dental, vision and group life coverage on the same premium cost sharing basis as prior to termination, and (iii) accelerated vesting of any unvested stock options.

If Mr. Host’s employment was terminated by Trustmark without Cause or he resigned for Good Reason where he is not entitled to such change in control enhanced severance benefits, he would have been entitled to twenty-four months of continuing medical, dental, vision and group life coverage on the same premium cost sharing basis as prior to termination, in addition to the Covenant Payments and earned compensation.

If Mr. Host’s employment was terminated due to disability or if he died during the term, he or his designated beneficiary, spouse or estate would have been entitled to a lump sum payment of his earned compensation plus a time-weighted pro-rata share of his annual bonus target amount for that year.

The amounts which would have been payable to Mr. Host assuming a termination event on December 31, 2020, are addressed in the “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” table beginning on page 35.

The above is a summary of the material terms and provisions of the First Host Agreement. For the complete First Host Agreement, including the definitions of the defined terms used therein, refer to the copies of the First Host Agreement that has been filed with the SEC on September 14, 2010, as Exhibit 10-z to Trustmark’s Current Report on Form 8-K, the First Amendment to the First Host Agreement that has been filed with the SEC on February 20, 2018, as Exhibit 10-v to Trustmark’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and the Second Amendment to the First Host Agreement that has been filed with the SEC on December 10, 2019, as Exhibit 10.1 to Trustmark’s Current Report on Form 8-K, and are incorporated by reference into this proxy statement.

Second Host Agreement.In connection with Mr. Host’s election and appointment as Executive Chairman of Trustmark and the Bank, effective January 1, 2021, Trustmark and Mr. Host entered into the Second Host Agreement.

The Second Host Agreement provides for Mr. Host to serve as Executive Chairman of Trustmark and the Bank for a term beginning January 1, 2021 and continuing until the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Under the Second Host Agreement, Mr. Host is guaranteed a minimum annual base salary of $700,000. Mr. Host’s base salary may be reduced, however, below $700,000, if Trustmark reduces the base salaries of other senior executives. Mr. Host will be eligible to earn an annual cash bonus, with a bonus target amount of 60% of his base salary. The Human Resources Committee will have the discretion to increase the annual bonus above or decrease the annual bonus below the bonus target amount for that year. Mr. Host will also be eligible to receive equity compensation awards on such basis as the Human Resources Committee of Trustmark’s Board of Directors determines.

On any cessation of employment, Mr. Host will be entitled to his unpaid earned base salary and, except in the case of termination for Cause (as defined below), any unpaid earned annual bonus for the prior year (earned compensation). He will be entitled to additional severance benefits in the event his employment ends as a result of his death or disability, or in the event his employment is terminated by Trustmark without Cause in connection with a change in control of Trustmark or not, or in the event Mr. Host resigns for Good Reason (as defined below) in connection with a change in control (as defined below) of Trustmark or not.

If Mr. Host’s employment is terminated by Trustmark other than for Cause, death or disability or if he resigns for Good Reason, in each case not in connection with a change in control of Trustmark, he will be entitled to earned compensation and a payment equal to two times the sum of (1) his annual base salary and (2) the average of his annual

bonuses for the three years prior to the end of his employment. He will also be entitled to 24 months of continuing medical, dental and vision coverage (or a cash payment in lieu thereof) on the same premium cost sharing basis as prior to termination.

If Mr. Host’s employment is terminated by Trustmark other than for Cause, death or disability or he resigns for Good Reason, in each case within two years after a change in control during the term of the Second Host Agreement, he will be entitled to the following additional severance benefits (in addition to earned compensation): (1) a payment equal to three times the sum of (x) his annual base salary immediately prior to the change in control and (y) the average of his annual bonuses for the three years prior to the change in control, (2) 36 months of continuing medical, dental and vision coverage (or a cash payment in lieu thereof) on the same premium cost sharing basis as prior to termination, and (3) accelerated vesting of any unvested equity incentive awards, with any time-or service-based vesting conditions deemed to be satisfied and any performance-based vesting conditions to be based on performance as of the end of the calendar quarter ending on or prior to the change in control.

If Mr. Host’s employment is terminated due to disability or if he dies during the term, he or his designated beneficiary, spouse or estate will be entitled to his earned compensation plus a lump-sum payment of the time-weighted pro-rata share of his annual bonus target amount for that year.

Employment Agreement with Mr. Dewey.In connection with Mr. Dewey’s election and appointment as President and designation as CEO of Trustmark and the Bank, effective January 1, 2021, Trustmark and Mr. Dewey entered into an employment agreement (the Dewey Agreement) to replace Mr. Dewey’s change in control agreement.. The Dewey Agreement iswas effective as of January 1, 2021. The Dewey Agreement provides for Mr. Dewey to serve as President and CEO of Trustmark and the Bank for a term of five years beginning January 1, 2021.

Under the Dewey Agreement, Mr. Dewey will beis guaranteed a minimum annual base salary of $700,000, subject to annual review. Mr. Dewey’s base salary may be reduced, however, below $700,000, if Trustmark reduces the base salaries of other senior executives. Mr. Dewey will beis eligible to earn an annual cash bonus, with a bonus target amount of 75% of his base salary, or for years after 2021, such greater percentage of his base salary up to a maximum of 100% as may be approved by Trustmark’s Board of Directors. The Human Resources Committee will havehas the discretion to increase the annual bonus above or decrease the annual bonus below the bonus target amount for that year. Mr. Dewey willis also be eligible to receive equity compensation awards on such basis as the Human Resources Committee of Trustmark’s Board of Directors determines.

The Dewey Agreement provides that on any cessation of employment, Mr. Dewey will beis entitled to his unpaid earned base salary and, except in the case of termination for Cause (as defined below), any unpaid earned annual bonus for the prior year (earned compensation). He will beis entitled to additional severance benefits in the event his employment ends as a result of his death or disability, or in the event his employment is terminated by Trustmark without Cause in connection with a change in control of Trustmark or not, or in the event Mr. Dewey resigns for Good Reason (as defined below) in connection with a change in control (as defined below) of Trustmark or not.

If Mr. Dewey’s employment is terminated by Trustmark other than for Cause, death or disability or if he resigns for Good Reason, in each case not in connection with a change in control of Trustmark, he will beis entitled to earned compensation and a payment equal to two times the sum of (i) his annual base salary and (ii) the average of his annual bonuses for the three years prior to the end of his employment. He willis also be entitled to 24 months of continuing medical, dental and vision coverage (or a cash payment in lieu thereof) on the same premium cost sharing basis as prior to termination.

If Mr. Dewey’s employment is terminated by Trustmark other than for Cause, death or disability or he resigns for Good Reason, in each case within two years after a change in control during the term of the Dewey Agreement, he will beis entitled to the following additional severance benefits (in addition to earned compensation): (i) a payment equal to three times the sum of (x) his annual base salary immediately prior to the change in control and (y) the average of his annual bonuses for the three years prior to the change in control, (ii) 36 months of continuing medical, dental and vision coverage (or a cash payment in lieu thereof) on the same premium cost sharing basis as prior to termination, and (iii) accelerated vesting of any unvested equity incentive awards, with any time- or service-based vesting conditions deemed to be satisfied and any performance-based vesting conditions to be based on performance as of the end of the calendar quarter ending on or prior to the change in control.

If Mr. Dewey’s employment is terminated due to disability or if he dies during the term, he or his designated beneficiary, spouse or estate will beis entitled to his earned compensation plus a lump-sum payment of the time-weighted pro-rata share of his annual bonus target amount for that year.

Certain Defined Terms Used in Second Host Agreement and Dewey Agreement.For purposes of the Second Host Agreement and the Dewey Agreement, the terms “Cause,” “Good Reason” and “change of control” have the meanings provided below.

“Cause” means (i) commission of an act of personal dishonesty, embezzlement or fraud, (ii) misuse of alcohol or drugs, (iii) failure to pay any obligation owed to Trustmark or any affiliate, (iv) breach of a fiduciary duty or deliberate disregard of any rule of Trustmark or any affiliate, (v) commission of an act of willful misconduct or the intentional failure to perform stated duties, (vi) willful violation of any law, rule or regulation (other than misdemeanors, traffic violations or similar offenses) or any final cease-and-desist order, (vii) unauthorized disclosure of any confidential information of Trustmark or any affiliate or engaging in any conduct constituting unfair

competition or inducing any customer of Trustmark or any affiliate to breach a contract with Trustmark or any affiliate, (viii) conviction of, or entry of a guilty plea or plea of no contest to, any felony or misdemeanor involving moral turpitude, (ix) continual failure to perform substantially his duties and responsibilities (other than any such failure resulting from incapacity due to disability) after a written demand for substantial performance is delivered which specifically identifies the manner in which he has not substantially performed his duties and responsibilities, (x) violation in any material respect of Trustmark’s policies or procedures, including the Code of Ethics, or (xi) conduct that has resulted, or if it became known by any regulatory or governmental agency or the public is reasonably likely to result, in the good faith judgment of the Board, in material injury to Trustmark, whether monetary, reputational or otherwise.

“Good Reason” means (i) a material diminution the executive officer’s authority, duties or responsibilities, (ii) a material breach of the agreement by Trustmark, or (iii) a relocation of Trustmark’s offices to a location more than fifty miles outside of Jackson, Mississippi, without the executive’s consent.

“Change in control” means (i) the acquisition by any person of the power to vote, or the acquisition of, more than 20% ownership of Trustmark’s voting stock, (ii) the acquisition by any person of control over the election of a majority of the Board, (iii) the acquisition by any person or by persons acting as a “group” for securities law purposes of a controlling influence over Trustmark’s management or policies, or (iv) during any two year period, a more than one-third change in the Board (Existing Board), treating any persons approved by a vote of at least two-thirds of the Existing Board as ongoing members of the Existing Board. However, in the case of (i), (ii), and (iii), ownership or control of Trustmark’s voting stock by a company-sponsored or a company subsidiary-sponsored employee benefit plan will not constitute a change in control.

The foregoing descriptions are summariesdescription is a summary of the material terms and provisions of the Second Host Agreement and the Dewey Agreement. For the complete Second Host Agreement and Dewey Agreement, including the exact definitions of the defined terms used therein, refer to the copiescopy of the Second Host Agreement and Dewey Agreement that havehas been filed with the SEC on October 27, 2021, as Exhibits 10.1 andExhibit 10.2 to Trustmark’s Current Report on Form 8-K and areis incorporated by reference into this proxy statement.

Change in Control Agreements with Other NEOs.In February 2014, upon the recommendation of the Committee and approval of the Board, Trustmark entered into identical change in control agreements with each of the NEOs (each a CIC Agreement), other than Mr. Host whose employment agreement already provided change in control benefits.NEOs. In addition, Mr. Dewey’s CIC Agreement was terminated effective January 1, 2021, because the Dewey Agreement provides change in control benefits. Under the CIC Agreement, if the executive’s employment is terminated by Trustmark other than due to death or disability or for Cause or he resigns for Good Reason, in each case within two years after a change in control, he will be entitled to the following benefits in addition to any previously earned compensation: (i) a lump sum payment within 60 days after termination equal to two times the sum of his base salary in effect immediately prior to the change in control and the average of his annual bonuses earned for the two years prior to the year in which the change in control occurs (the CIC Severance Benefit), and (ii) eighteen months of continuing medical, dental, vision and group life coverage on the same premium cost sharing basis as prior to termination (the CIC Continuing Benefit). Each CIC Agreement includes standard confidentiality obligations during and after the executive’s employment. In addition, each CIC Agreement includes standard non-solicitation and non-competition obligations during the executive’s employment and for twelve months after the executive’s employment ends when the executive is eligible to receive the CIC Severance Benefit. Each CIC Agreement also provides that Trustmark may retain the CIC Severance Benefit if the executive violates the confidentiality, non-solicitation or non-competition obligation. Each executive is required to sign a release agreement with Trustmark prior to receiving the CIC Severance Benefit and the CIC Continuing Benefit after termination.

For purposes of the CIC Agreements, the terms “Cause” and “change in control” have substantially the same meanings as in the First HostDewey Agreement, and “Good Reason” means (i) a material diminution in the executive’s authority, duties or responsibilities, (ii) a material diminution in the executive’s base compensation, (iii) a material breach of the agreement by Trustmark, or (iv) a

40


relocation of Trustmark’s offices to a location more than fifty miles outside of Jackson, Mississippi, provided such relocation is considered a material change in the location where the executive must perform services.

The amounts which would have been payable to the NEOs other than Mr. HostDewey under the CIC Agreements assuming a change in control and termination event on December 31, 2020,2022, are addressed in the “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” table beginning on page 35.36.

The above is a summary of the material terms and provisions of the CIC Agreements. For a complete CIC Agreement, including the exact definitions of the defined terms used therein, refer to the form of CIC Agreement that has been filed with the SEC on February 7, 2014, as Exhibit 10-ad to Trustmark’s Form 8-K Current Report, and is incorporated by reference into this proxy statement.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

 

Non-employee director compensation is determined by the Board, based on the recommendation of the Human Resources Committee. Directors who are employed by Trustmark receive no compensation for Board or committee service. During 2020,2022, each non-employee director who served on the Board also served on the Bank Board.

The Board periodically reviews non-employee director compensation to determine if changes are needed, including by comparing it to non-employee director compensation at peer companies.

For 2020,2022, cash compensation for non-employee directors was comprised of an annual retainer of $45,000 for their combined service on the Trustmark Board and the Bank Board. In addition, the independent Chairman of the Board received an annual retainer of $50,000. The Lead Director received an annual cash retainer of $30,000.$30,000 (inclusive of Executive Committee Chair retainer). The Chairs of certain Trustmark Board committees received an annual retainer ($20,000 for the Chair of the Audit & Finance Committee, $15,000 for the Chairs of the Human Resources Committee and the Enterprise Risk Committee, and $5,000 for the Chair of the Nominating Committee), and the Chairs of certain Bank Board committees received an annual retainer ($10,000 for the Chairs of the Asset/Liability Committee and the Credit Policy Committee). All members of Board and Bank Board committees, other than the Chairmen,Chair, also received an annual retainer of $2,500 per committee. In addition, Mrs. Conerly servedThe Chairman of the Board received an annual retainer of $150,000 for service on the Emerald Coast CommunityTrustmark Corporation and Trustmark National Bank Advisory Board and received a feeBoards (inclusive of $1,000 for each meeting attended. Mr. Morrissette served on the Mobile/Baldwin County, Alabama Community Bank Advisory Board and received a fee of $750 for each meeting attended.all Committee memberships).

Annual retainer fees were paid monthly. Directors are also eligible to be reimbursed for expenses incurred in attending Board and committee meetings.

As of January 1, 2023, cash compensation for non-employee directors was comprised of an annual retainer of $45,000 for their combined service on the Trustmark Board and the Bank Board. The Lead Director receives an annual cash retainer of $30,000 (inclusive of Executive Committee Chair retainer). The Chairs of Trustmark Board committees other than the Executive Committee (i.e., the Audit, Enterprise Risk, Finance, Human Resources and Nominating & Governance Committees) receive an annual retainer of $20,000. All members of Board and Board committees, other than the Chair, also receive an annual retainer of $2,500 per committee. The Chair receives an annual retainer of $150,000 (inclusive of annual Board retainer and all committee memberships).

For 2020,2022, each director also received an award of time-based restricted stock under the Amended and Restated Stock Plan valued at approximately $55,000. To help align the interests of directors with shareholders and encourage a focus on long-term growth, Trustmark has guidelines that require non-executive directors to own a minimum number of shares of Trustmark stock in an amount equal to a multiple of six times the annual cash retainer as in effect from time to time. The number of shares required to be owned is calculated by reference to the 10-day trading average share price through March 31 each year. Shares of unvested time-based restricted stock are counted as shares owned for purposes of the guidelines.

Based on the most recent review of ownership level attainment in 2020,2022, all of the current directors, except General Collins and Mr. Eduardo, and Dr. Hays, meet the stock ownership requirements. Until a director has reached the minimum requirement, the director is required to hold 100% of the shares received from any Trustmark stock awards.awards (net of any shares sold to cover tax liabilities). To ensure that directors bear the full risks of stock ownership, Trustmark’s Insider Trading Policy prohibits directors, among others, from engaging in options trading, short sales or hedging transactions relating to Trustmark stock. Directors are also prohibited from pledging or creating a security interest in any Trustmark stock they hold.

Trustmark maintains a Directors’ Deferred Fee Plan for non-employee directors who became directors prior to 2003 and who elected to participate in the plan. Under the plan, participating directors were required to defer $12,000 of their fees annually to fund a portion of the cost of their defined retirement benefits and death benefits. The amount of the retirement benefit and death benefit has been determined based upon the participant’s annual contribution amount, the length of Board service and the age of the director at date of entry into the plan. The Board amended the plan in 2009 to cease future benefit accruals under and contributions by directors to the plan effective March 1, 2010. The plan requires retirement benefits to commence at a director’s normal retirement date (defined in the plan as March 1 following age 65). Thus, should a director continue service beyond normal retirement date, retirement benefits would begin prior to cessation of Board service. Depending on a number of factors, the vested annual benefit at retirement is payable for the longer of life or twenty-five years and, as of December 31, 2020,2022, ranges from $51,000 to $78,000 (taking into account the March 1, 2010, benefit accrual freeze) for current directors who elected to participate in the plan. Trustmark has purchased life insurance contracts on participating directors to fund the benefits under this plan.

Non-employee directors may defer all or a part of their annual retainer fees pursuant to the NQDC Plan. The compensation deferred is credited to an account, which is deemed invested in and mirrors the performance of one or more designated investment funds available under the plan and selected at the option of the director. The deferred compensation account will be paid in a

41


lump sum or in annual installments at a designated time upon the occurrence of an unforeseen emergency or upon a director’s retirement or cessation of service on the Board.

Director Compensation for 20202022

The following table provides director compensation information for the year ended December 31, 2020.2022.

 

Name (1)   

Fees Earned
or Paid in
Cash
(2)

($)

  Stock
Awards 
(3)
($)
  Option
Awards 
(4)
($)
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
  

Change in
Pension Value and
Non-Qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
(5)

($)

  All Other
Compensation 
(6)
($)
  

Total

($)

  

Fees Earned

or Paid in

Cash (2)

($)

  

Stock

Awards (3)

($)

  

Option

Awards (4)

($)

  

Non-Equity

Incentive Plan

Compensation

($)

  

Change in

Pension Value and

Non-Qualified

Deferred

Compensation

Earnings (5)

($)

  

All Other

Compensation (6)

($)

  

Total  

($)  

Adolphus B. Baker

   $65,000   $ 54,447    ---    ---   $136,778   $4,449   $260,674  $   65,000  $ 52,969  ---  ---  ---  $ 1,279   $ 119,248     

William A. Brown

   $ 50,000   $54,447    ---    ---    ---   $4,449   $108,896  $   65,000  $ 52,969  ---  ---  ---  $ 1,279   $ 119,248     

Augustus L. Collins (7)

   $33,333   $59,065    ---    ---    ---   $1,566   $93,964  $   50,000  $ 52,969  ---  ---  ---  $ 1,279   $ 104,248     

James N. Compton (8)

   $17,500   $54,447    ---    ---    ---   $1,112   $73,059

Tracy T. Conerly

   $72,667   $54,447    ---    ---    ---   $4,449   $131,563  $   73,500  $ 52,969  ---  ---  ---  $ 1,279   $ 127,748     

Toni D. Cooley

   $65,000   $54,447    ---    ---    ---   $4,449   $123,896

Toni D. Cooley (7)

  $   15,833  ---  ---  ---  ---  ---   $   15,833     

Marcelo Eduardo (7)

   $33,333   $59,065    ---    ---    ---   $1,566   $93,964

Marcelo Eduardo

  $   62,500  $ 52,969  ---  ---  ---  $ 1,279   $ 116,748     

J. Clay Hays Jr., M.D.

   $51,667   $54,447    ---    ---    ---   $4,449   $110,563  $   70,000  $ 52,969  ---  ---  ---  $ 1,279   $ 124,248     

Gerard R. Host (8)

  $ 150,000  $ 52,969  ---  ---  ---  $ 1,279   $ 204,248     

Harris V. Morrissette

   $53,250   $54,447    ---    ---    ---   $4,449   $112,146  $   54,750  $ 52,969  ---  ---  ---  $ 1,279   $ 108,998     

Richard H. Puckett

   $82,500   $54,447    ---    ---   $107,139   $4,449   $248,535  $   85,000  $ 52,969  ---  ---  ---  $ 1,279   $ 139,248     

R. Michael Summerford (8)

   $34,167   $54,447    ---    ---    ---   $ 1,112   $89,726

Harry M. Walker

   $60,000   $54,447    ---    ---    ---   $4,449   $118,896

LeRoy G. Walker, Jr. (8)

   $17,500   $54,447    ---    ---   $49,677   $1,112   $122,736

William G. Yates III

   $50,000   $54,447    ---    ---    ---   $4,449   $108,896  $   50,000  $ 52,969  ---  ---  ---  $ 1,279   $ 104,248     

 

 (1)

Mr. Host and Mr. Dewey areis not included in this table as they are associateshe is an associate of Trustmark and thus received no compensation for theirhis service as a director. The compensation received by Messrs. Host andMr. Dewey as associatesan associate of Trustmark is shown in the “Summary Compensation Table for 2020”2022” on page 29.30.

 (2)

Amounts include fees earned or paid for service on both the Trustmark Board and the Bank Board and their respective committees. The amounts in this column include fees deferred pursuant to the NQDC Plan. For Mrs. Conerly and Mr. Morrissette, the amountamounts also includesinclude fees paid for attendance at meetings of the Emerald Coast Community Bank Advisory Boarda community bank advisory board of Directors. For Mr. Morrissette, the amount also includes fees paid for attendance at meetings of the Mobile, Alabama, Community Bank Advisory Board of Directors.directors.

 (3)

On February 19, 2020,April 26, 2022, each non-employee director except General Collins and Mr. Eduardo, received 1,7021,854 shares of time-based restricted stock units, valued on a 10-day average closing stock price up to and including the date of the grant. On April 28, 2020, General Collins and Mr. Eduardo each received 2,270 shares of time-based restricted stock units, valued on a 10-day average closing stock price up to and including the date of the grant. Subject to accelerated vesting in full upon a change in control, upon retirement at or after age 6570 or cessation of Board service at the end of an elected term, in each case with consent of the Human Resources Committee and where cause for termination is not present, or upon disability, death or termination without cause, the February 19, 2020 grants of restricted units vested on February 19, 2021 and the April 28,202026, 2022, grants of restricted units will vest on April 28, 2021, if the director is still serving at the time.26, 2023. The amounts in this column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value (computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718 excluding the impact of estimated forfeitures). Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in Note 1615 to Trustmark’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020,2022, in Trustmark’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 18, 2021.16, 2023. At December 31, 2020,2022, each non-employee director except General Collins and Mr. Eduardo, held 4,8361,854 shares of unvested time-based restricted stock and General Collins and Mr. Eduardo held 2,270 shares of unvested time-based restricted stock.units.

 (4)

No stock option awards were made during 2020.2022. At December 31, 2020,2022, none of the non-employee directors held any stock options.

 (5)

The amounts shown in the table above reflect the changes in actuarial present value of the directors’ accumulated benefits under Trustmark’s Directors’ Deferred Fee Plan. The increasesdecreases were determined using interest rate and mortality rate assumptions included in Note 1514 to Trustmark’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020,2022, in Trustmark’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 18, 2021.16, 2023. Decreases in pension value of the Directors’ Deferred Fee Plan benefits were largely the result of an increase in the 2022 discount rate. Negative changes in pension values were as follows: Baker -- $(241,412); Puckett -- $(347,068).

 (6)

The amounts in this column reflect the dividends credited to shares of unvested time-based restricted stock held by the directors on each dividend payment date during 2020.2022. These dividends are accumulated and will vest and be paid only when and to the extent the related restricted shares vest.

 (7)

General Collins and Mr. Eduardo joined the Board on April 28, 2020.

(8)

Messrs. Compton, Summerford and L. WalkerMs. Cooley retired from the Board as of April 26, 2022.

(8)

Mr. Host ceased serving as Executive Chairman on April 28, 2020.26, 2022, and has served as Chair of the Board since that date.

PROPOSAL 2: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

Section 14A of the Exchange Act requires that Trustmark’s shareholders have the opportunity to provide an advisory vote to approve Trustmark’s executive compensation as disclosed in this proxy statement pursuant to the SEC’s compensation disclosure rules. Accordingly, Trustmark’s shareholders are hereby given the opportunity to cast an advisory vote to approve or not approve the compensation of Trustmark’s NEOs as described above, by voting for or against this proposal.

The Human Resources Committee and Board have designed Trustmark’s executive compensation to recruit, retain and motivate employees who play a significant role in the organization’s current and future success. Trustmark, through the Human Resources Committee, the Board and the contributions of an outside compensation consultant, structures executive compensation to motivate these employees to maximize shareholder value by achieving performance goals while limiting risk appropriately and maintaining the safety and soundness of the organization. For a full description of these executive compensation practices, please see the description provided under the heading

“Executive “Executive Compensation,” including the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and the tabular disclosures of NEO compensation and related disclosures that follow.

This proposal gives you as a shareholder the opportunity to vote for or against the following resolution: “RESOLVED, that the shareholders hereby approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid toTrustmark’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and the narrative discussion disclosed in this proxy statement on pages 1719 to 28.40.

42


Trustmark believes that its executive compensation and compensation practices and policies are reasonable in comparison to its peer group, are focused on pay-for-performance principles, are strongly aligned with the long-term interest of shareholders and are necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly-qualified executives important to Trustmark’s long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. The Board believes that Trustmark’s executive compensation achieves these objectives, and, therefore, recommends that shareholders vote “for”“FOR” the proposal.

Because this vote is advisory, it will not be binding on the Board and will not be construed as overruling any decision made by the Board. The Human Resources Committee and the Board will take into account the outcome of this advisory vote when considering future executive compensation arrangements, but they are not required to do so.

The Board recommends that shareholders vote “for”“FOR” this proposal to provide advisory approval of Trustmark’s executive compensation.

PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF ADVISORY VOTES ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Section 14A of the Exchange Act also requires that Trustmark’s shareholders have the opportunity to recommend how frequently Trustmark should provide an advisory vote on Trustmark’s executive compensation, as disclosed pursuant to the SEC’s compensation disclosure rules, such as Proposal 2 above. By voting on this proposal, shareholders may indicate whether they would prefer that the advisory vote on Trustmark’s executive compensation occur every one, two or three years.

After careful consideration, the Board has determined that an advisory vote on Trustmark’s executive compensation that occurs every year is the most appropriate alternative for Trustmark, and therefore the Board recommends that shareholders vote for a one-year frequency for the advisory vote on Trustmark’s executive compensation.

In formulating its recommendation, the Board considered that an annual advisory vote on executive compensation will allow shareholders to provide Trustmark with their direct input on Trustmark’s executive compensation philosophy, policies and practices as disclosed in the proxy statement every year. Additionally, an annual advisory vote on executive compensation is consistent with Trustmark’s policy of seeking input from, and engaging in discussions with, shareholders on corporate governance matters and executive compensation.

Shareholders are presented with four choices for the frequency of the advisory vote on executive compensation: (1) every one year, (2) every two years, (3) every three years or (4) abstain. Shareholders are not voting on the approval or disapproval of the Board’s frequency recommendation. The option of one year, two years or three years that receives the highest number of votes cast by the shareholders will be the frequency for the advisory vote on executive compensation that has been recommended by the shareholders. The Board will take into account the outcome of the vote when considering how frequently to provide an advisory vote on executive compensation in the future. However, because this vote is advisory and not binding on the Board or Trustmark, the Board may decide that it is in the best interests of Trustmark and its shareholders to select a frequency of advisory vote on executive compensation that differs from the option that receives the highest number of votes from shareholders.

The Board recommends that shareholders vote for a frequency of “ONE YEAR” for advisory votes on Trustmark’s executive compensation.

PROPOSAL 4: APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF TRUSTMARK’S ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION TO PROVIDE FOR EXCULPATION OF DIRECTORS IN ACCORDANCE WITH MISSISSIPPI LAW.

Trustmark is asking shareholders to approve an amendment and restatement of its articles of incorporation to provide that directors shall not be liable to Trustmark or its shareholders for money damages for any action, or any failure to take any action, as a director, subject to certain exceptions described below. This is commonly referred to as an “exculpation” clause. Mississippi law provides that directors shall have the benefit of such exculpation if the company’s articles of incorporation provide for it. In addition to adding a new article addressing director exculpation, the proposed amendment and restatement of the articles of incorporation would make non-substantive changes to make consistent the references to Trustmark contained in the articles. The full text of the proposed amended and restated articles of incorporation is attached as Annex A to this proxy statement (the “Amended and Restated Articles”). The Amended and Restated Articles will be approved if the votes cast in favor of the proposal exceed the votes cast opposing the proposal.

On February 15, 2023, the Board unanimously approved the Amended and Restated Articles. The Board believes that adopting the Amended and Restated Articles is advisable and in the best interests of Trustmark and its shareholders and recommends that shareholders approve the Amended and Restated Articles.

Section 79-4-2.02(b)(4) of the Mississippi Code permits a Mississippi corporation to include an exculpation provision in its articles of incorporation eliminating the liability of a director to the corporation or its shareholders for money damages for any action taken, or any failure to take any action, as a director, except liability for (i) the amount of a financial benefit received by a director to which he or she is not entitled; (ii) an intentional infliction of harm on the corporation or the shareholders; (iii) a violation of Section 79-4-8.33 of the Mississippi Code, which governs liability for unlawful distributions; or (iv) an intentional violation of criminal law.

The Board believes the governing instruments of the vast majority of public companies provide for exculpation of directors similar to that being proposed, and that such exculpation provisions have become a routine element of public companies’

43


corporate governance structure. The Board believes that adopting the Amended and Restated Articles is in the best interests of Trustmark and its shareholders because adding a director exculpation clause will help Trustmark attract and retain the most highly qualified individuals to serve as directors. The Board believes this is necessary to ensure that concerns about potential exposure to personal liability will not adversely affect the ability of our directors to make the difficult, potentially value-maximizing business decisions that are necessary in today’s highly competitive business environment. In the competitive environment in which we operate, the Board believes an exculpation provision will allow directors to more effectively fulfill their role on behalf of shareholders. The Board also took note of the increasing trend toward greater frequency of litigation and similar claims against directors and the substantial costs associated with defending against such claims, regardless of their merit or their lack thereof. For all of the foregoing reasons, the Board believes adopting the Amended and Restated Articles is in the best interests of Trustmark and its shareholders.

The Board recommends that shareholders vote “FOR” the proposed amended and restated articles of incorporation.

PROPOSAL 5: RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR

 

Trustmark has engaged Crowe as its independent auditor since December 21, 2015, and the Audit & Finance Committee reaffirmed Crowe’s engagement as the independent auditor for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021.2023. The Board recommends that shareholders vote in favor of ratifying the selection of Crowe. If shareholders do not ratify the selection of Crowe, the Audit & Finance Committee will consider a change in independent auditor for the next year.

The Audit & Finance Committee is responsible for approving the compensation paid to Crowe as Trustmark’s independent auditor. In order to assure continuing auditor independence, the Audit & Finance Committee periodically considers whether there should be regular rotation of the independent auditing firm. The members of the Audit & Finance Committee and the Board believe that continued retention of Crowe to serve as Trustmark’s independent auditor is in the best interest of Trustmark and its shareholders.

Representatives of Crowe are expected to be present at the annual meeting with the opportunity to make a statement, if they desire to do so, and to be available to respond to appropriate questions during the period generally allotted for questions at the meeting.

The Board recommends that shareholders vote “for”“FOR” ratification of the selection of Crowe as Trustmark’s independent auditor.

AUDIT & FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT

 

Trustmark’s Audit & Finance Committee conducts the usual and necessary activities in connection with the audit functions of Trustmark. The Committee reviewed and discussed with management and Crowe the consolidated audited financial statements as of and for the three years ended December 31, 2020.2022. The Committee also discussed with Crowe the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). The Committee received the written disclosures and the letter from Crowe required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent auditor’s communications with the audit committee concerning independence and discussed the independence of Crowe. Based on this review, the Committee recommended to the Board that the consolidated audited financial statements be included in Trustmark’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020.2022.

All of the following members of Trustmark’s Audit & Finance Committee are independent directors as defined by Nasdaq Listing Rules:

 

Tracy T. Conerly (Chair)

  

Marcelo Eduardo

Augustus L. Collins

William A. Brown

  

Harris V. Morrissette

Augustus L. Collins

Marcelo Eduardo

The Board has determined that Tracy T. Conerly and Harris V. MorrissetteMarcelo Eduardo each qualify as an audit committee financial expert pursuant to the requirements of the SEC.

44


Principal Accountant Fees

The following table presents the fees for professional audit services rendered by Crowe for the audit of Trustmark’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020,2022, and December 31, 2019,2021, and fees billed for other services rendered by Crowe during those periods. All services reflected below for 20202022 and

2019 2021 were pre-approved in accordance with the policy of the Audit & Finance Committee.Committee (the relevant responsibilities of which are now performed by the Audit Committee). Information related to audit fees for 20202022 includes amounts billed through December 31, 2020,2022, and additional amounts estimated to be billed for the 20202022 period for audit services rendered.

 

Year  

Audit

Fees (1)

  Audit-Related
Fees
(2)
  

All Other

Fees (3)

  Total

2020

  $1,163,900  $375,839  ---  $ 1,539,739

2019

  $1,114,000  $226,271  --  $ 1,340,271
Year  

Audit

Fees (1)

  

Audit-Related

Fees (2)

  

All Other

Fees (3)

                  Total                

2022

  $ 1,265,000  $  132,648  ---  $   1,397,648

2021

  $ 1,175,280  $  129,488  ---  $   1,304,768

 

 (1)

Audit fees include fees for professional services in connection with the audit of Trustmark’s consolidated financial statements, audit of internal control over financial reporting, review of the interim consolidated financial statements included in quarterly reports and services provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings.

 (2)

Audit-related fees include assurance and related services that are traditionally performed by the independent registered public accounting firm and include compliance testing and reporting, internal control reviews and agreed upon procedure reports. The increase in audit-related fees for 2020 was primarily due to fees associated with the issuance of Trustmark’s 3.625% Fixed-to-Floating Rate Subordinated Notes due December 1, 2030.

 (3)

Crowe did not provide any tax services to Trustmark in 20202022 or 2019.2021.

Pre-Approval Policy

The Audit & Finance Committee has adoptedadministers a policy that sets forth guidelines and procedures for the pre-approval of services to be performed by the independent auditor, as well as the fees associated with those services. Annually, the Committee reviews and establishes the types of services and fee levels to be provided by the independent auditor. Any additional services or fees in excess of the approved amounts require specific pre-approval by the Committee. The Committee has delegated to its Chair the authority to evaluate and approve services and fees in the event that pre-approval is required between meetings. If the Chair grants such approval, she will report that approval to the full Committee at its next meeting. Non-audit services, prohibited by the SEC, are likewise prohibited under the Committee’s pre-approval policy.

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

 

This section provides information regarding certain transactions between Trustmark and its subsidiaries and certain of our directors and officers.officers and greater-than-5% shareholders.

The Bank has made loans to directors, executive officers and principal shareholders and their related interests in 20202022 and in prior years and continues to do so in 2021.2023. Such loans were made in the course of ordinary business, were made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable loans with persons not related to the Bank, and do not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features. Loan transactions with directors, executive officers and principal shareholders and their related interests are approved by the Board as part of the Bank’s loan review policy under Regulation O.

The Bank made a payment of approximately $275,000 in 20202022 to Bloomfield Equities, LLC, for the naming rights to the Mississippi Braves AA Baseball Stadium, known as “Trustmark Park.” Ninety percent (90%) of Bloomfield Equities, LLC, is owned indirectly by Trustmark director William G. Yates III and his family through Spectrum Capital, LLC, which is owned thirty-three percent (33%) by Mr. Yates III and sixty-seven percent (67%) by his family and a family trust. The dollar value of Mr. Yates III’s interest in the transaction was approximately $81,675. The collective dollar value of this transaction to the Yates family (excluding Mr. Yates) was approximately $165,825. The Bank expects to make a payment of $275,000 in 20212023 to Bloomfield Equities, LLC, for naming rights to Trustmark Park. The specific dollar value of Mr. Yates III’s interest in the 20212023 transaction is not known at this time.

In addition,2022, the Trustmark paid $5,000 in 2020 tologo was incorporated into all of Spectrum Events, LLC marketing and advertising due to a Naming Rights sponsorship agreement for the sponsorship of a high school baseball tournament played at Trustmark Park. (Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the 2020 Governor’s Cup college baseball games scheduled to be played at Trustmark Park, for which Trustmark had purchased a sponsorship, were cancelled.) Spectrum Events, LLC is wholly owned by Spectrum Capital, LLC. The dollar value of Mr. Yates III’s interest in the transaction was approximately $1,650, and the collective dollar value of this transaction to the Yates family (excluding Mr. Yates) was approximately $3,350. Trustmark expects to pay $14,000 for sponsorship of high school and college baseball series to be held at Trustmark Park in 2021. The specific dollar value of Mr. Yates III’s interest in the 2021 transactions is not known at this time.no additional consideration.

In addition, Trustmark paid Bloomfield Holdings, LLC $60,000 in 20202022 for, among other things, exclusive banking rights at the Outlets of Mississippi, which is owned by Bloomfield Holdings, LLC. Ninety percent (90%) of Bloomfield Holdings, LLC is owned indirectly by Spectrum Capital, LLC. The dollar value of Mr. Yates III’s interest in the transactions was approximately $17,820. The collective dollar value of these transactions to the Yates family (excluding Mr. Yates) was approximately $36,180. Trustmark anticipates payingnegotiating an agreement with Bloomfield Holdings, LLC $60,000 in 20212023 for, among other things, exclusive banking rights at the Outlets of Mississippi.

During 2013, in connection with the New Markets Tax Credit Program, the Bank purchased approximately $4.4 million of state and federal tax credits for approximately $2.8 million through two entities in each of which the Bank holds a 99.99% interest. The federal tax credit, which totaled approximately $2.0 million, was allocated to this transaction by SCC Sub-CDE 2, LLC (SCC Sub), a subsidiary of Southern Community Capital, LLC (SCC), which in turn was allocated the federal tax credit by SCC, a subsidiary of the Bank. SCC owns 0.01% of SCC Sub, with a

managing member distribution for that percentage paid back to SCC on a quarterly basis. Of the Bank’s approximately $2.8 million investment, approximately $2.0 was ultimately loaned to Bloomfield Holdings, LLC by SCC Sub in connection with a qualifying real estate development project. The loan by SCC Sub to Bloomfield Holdings, LLC has an annual interest rate of 1.00% and a term of 30 years. These tax-credit transactions were unwound and the loan’s outstanding balance was repaid in 2020.

During 2020, the Bank paid approximately $3.4 million in construction management fees to2022, W. G. Yates & Sons Construction Company (WGY&S) in connection with the construction of new facilities located in Jackson and Brandon, Mississippi. WGY&S is wholly-owned by Mr. Yates III and his family, and Mr. Yates III serves as its President and CEO. Trustmark expects to pay approximately $1.0 million in construction management fees to WGY&S relating to the Brandon, Mississippi, project in 2021.

In addition, during 2020, Trustmark paid approximately $65,000 to WGY&S for assistance with hurricane disaster response, recovery and repairs for branch offices located in Bay County, Florida, following Hurricane Michael in October 2018.

During 2020, WGY&S and certain of its wholly-ownedwholly owned subsidiaries and affiliates paid premiums for employee benefits insurance policies to third party insurance companies. Fisher Brown Bottrell received commissions of approximately $1.3$1.1 million from such insurance companies for placing these policies. Trustmark believes the premiums and the terms of the insurance policies are no more favorable than could be obtained from a nonrelated party in an arm’s length transaction. Fisher Brown Bottrell continues to serve as insurance agent for these policies for WGY&S in 2021.2023. The dollar value of Mr. Yates III’s interest in this transaction is not known at this time. In addition, during 2020,2022, WGY&S and certain of its subsidiaries and affiliates paid the Bank an aggregate of approximately $290,000$393,000 in fees for trust and investment management services, including for serving as trustee of certain 401(k) plans for such affiliates. Trustmark believes these fees are no more favorable than could be obtained from a nonrelated party in an arm’s length transaction. The Bank

45


continues to provide these services for WGY&S in 2021.2023. The dollar value of Mr. Yates III’sIII���s interest in this transaction is not known at this time.

During 2020,2022, MINACT, Inc. (MINACT) and certain of its wholly-ownedwholly owned subsidiaries and affiliates paid premiums for employee benefits insurance policies to third party insurance companies. General Collins is the CEO of MINACT. Fisher Brown Bottrell received commissions of approximately $281,000$271,000 from such insurance companies for placing these policies. Trustmark believes the premiums and the terms of the insurance policies are no more favorable than could be obtained from a nonrelated party in an arm’s length transaction. Fisher Brown Bottrell continues to serve as insurance agent for these policies for MINACT in 2021.2023.

Trustmark’s Audit & Finance Committee has adopted and managesadministers a written policy that governs the review, approval or ratification of related party transactions. For purposes of this policy, a “related party transaction” is a transaction, arrangement or relationship (or a series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships) in which Trustmark is, or will be, a participant and in which a “related party” has a direct or indirect material interest where the aggregate amount involved exceeds $120,000. A “related party” is (i) an executive officer, director or nominee for director of Trustmark, (ii) a shareholder owning in excess of 5% of Trustmark’s outstanding equity securities, (iii) a person who is an immediate family member of someone listed in (i) or (ii), or (iv) an entity (a) which is controlled by someone listed in (i), (ii) or (iii), (b) in which someone listed in (i), (ii) or (iii) above owns 5% or more of the outstanding equity securities, or (c) of which someone listed in (i), (ii) or (iii) is an executive officer or general partner.

The policy provides that any related party transaction must be reported to the General Counsel and may be consummated or may continue only if the Audit & Finance Committee determines that, under all of the circumstances, the transaction is not inconsistent with the best interests of Trustmark. Generally, a transaction that is on terms comparable to those that could be obtained in arm’s length dealings with an unrelated third party will be presumed to not be inconsistent with the best interests of Trustmark. Certain categories of transactions are deemed to be pre-approved by the Audit & Finance Committee and do not require separate approval. These include, among other things, compensation or benefits arrangements approved by the Human Resources Committee and extensions of credit made in the ordinary course of business, on substantially the same terms, including interest rate and collateral, of those prevailing at the time for comparable loans with persons not related to Trustmark and not presenting more than the normal risk of collectability or other unfavorable features.

The Audit & Finance Committee reviewed, considered, and approved, or ratified, the payments, as applicable, to Bloomfield Equities, LLC, Spectrum Events, LLC, Bloomfield Holdings, LLC, and WGY&S, and, therefore, to Mr. Yates III,III. The Audit Committee also reviewed, considered, and approved, or ratified, as well asapplicable, the business relationships between Fisher Brown Bottrell, the Bank and WGY&S and certain of its subsidiaries and affiliates, and the business relationship between Fisher Brown Bottrell and MINACT, Inc.

46


BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF TRUSTMARK STOCK

 

The following table reflects the number of Trustmark shares beneficially owned by (a) persons known by Trustmark to be the beneficial owners of more than 5% of its outstanding shares, (b) current directors and director nominees, (c) each of the NEOs within the Executive Compensation section, and (d) current directors and executive officers of Trustmark as a group. The persons listed below have sole voting and investment authority for all shares except as indicated. The percentage of outstanding shares of common stock owned is not shown where less than 1%. All percentage computations are based on 63,694,15360,979,518 shares of Trustmark common stock outstanding as of February 2, 2021,1, 2023, which includes unvested restricted stock. For certain of the directors, theThe number of shares beneficially owned includes shares underlying restricted stock units that vest within 60 days of February 2, 2021.1, 2023. As of February 2, 2021,1, 2023, there were no options outstanding.

 

Name

Shares
Beneficially
Owned

as of 02/02/21

Percent of            
Outstanding            
Shares            

BlackRock, Inc.
55 East 52nd Street
New York, New York 10055

7,147,909(1)11.2%            

The Robert M. Hearin Foundation
The Robert M. Hearin Support Foundation
Post Office Box 16505
Jackson, Mississippi 39236

5,558,024(2)8.7%            

The Vanguard Group
100 Vanguard Boulevard
Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355

5,554,831(3)8.7%            

Dimensional Fund Advisors LP
Dimensional Place
6300 Bee Cave Road, Building One
Austin, Texas 78746

4,022,520(4)6.3%            

Adolphus B. Baker

38,134(5)

William A. Brown


13,964
(5) (6)

Augustus L. Collins

1,453    

Tracy T. Conerly

12,402(5)

Toni D. Cooley


16,769
(5)

Duane A. Dewey

52,649(7)

Marcelo Eduardo

1,418    (8)

Louis E. Greer


52,984
(9) (10)

Robert B. Harvey

35,559(9)

J. Clay Hays, Jr., M.D.

9,671(5) (11)

Gerard R. Host

279,481(12)

Harris V. Morrissette

18,206(5)

Richard H. Puckett

110,974(5) (13)

Breck W. Tyler

28,241(14)

Harry M. Walker

61,161(5) (15)

William G. Yates III

20,231(5)

Directors and executive officers of Trustmark as a group

858,545(16)1.3%
Name  

Shares

Beneficially

Owned

as of 02/1/23

      

Percent of

Outstanding

Shares

   

BlackRock, Inc.

 

55 East 52nd Street

 

New York, New York 10055

 

   8,628,385  (1)                          14.1%  

The Vanguard Group

 

100 Vanguard Way

 

Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355

 

   6,648,706  (2)      10.9%                      

The Robert M. Hearin Foundation

 

The Robert M. Hearin Support Foundation

 

Post Office Box 16505

 

Jackson, Mississippi 39236

 

   3,983,560  (3)      6.5%  

Dimensional Fund Advisors LP

 

Dimensional Place

 

6300 Bee Cave Road, Building One

 

Austin, Texas 78746

 

   3,946,176  (4)      6.5%  

EARNEST Partners, LLC

 

1180 Peachtree Street NE

 

Suite 2300

 

Atlanta, Georgia 30309

 

   3,689,701  (5)      6.1%  

Adolphus B. Baker

   42,616      

William A. Brown

   16,304  (6)    

Augustus L. Collins

   5,669      

Tracy T. Conerly

   14,451  (7)    

Duane A. Dewey

   56,716  (8)    

Marcelo Eduardo

   4,281  (9)    

Robert B. Harvey

   36,204      

J. Clay Hays, Jr., M.D.

   11,805  (10)    

Gerard R. Host

   272,728  (11)    

Harris V. Morrissette

   22,137      

Thomas C. Owens

   19,774      

Richard H. Puckett

   220,701  (12)    

Wayne A. Stevens

   41,716  (13)    

Granville Tate, Jr.

   23,371      

William G. Yates III

   22,548      

Directors and executive officers of Trustmark as a group

   831,728  (14)    1.4%  

 

(1)

According to Amendment No. 1215 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 27, 2021,23, 2023, by BlackRock, Inc., as of December 31, 2020,2022, BlackRock, Inc., through its subsidiaries, has sole voting power with respect to 7,040,8178,511,028 shares of Trustmark common stock and sole investment power with respect to 7,147,9098,628,385 shares of Trustmark common stock. The foregoing information has been included solely in reliance upon the disclosures contained in the referenced amended Schedule 13G.

(2)

According to Amendment No. 11 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 9, 2023, by The Vanguard Group, as of December 31, 2022, The Vanguard Group, through its subsidiaries, has sole voting power with respect to zero shares of Trustmark common stock and sole investment power with respect to 6,537,504 shares of Trustmark common stock. The aggregate amount beneficially owned by each reporting person was 6,648,706 shares of Trustmark common stock. The foregoing information has been included solely in reliance upon the disclosures contained in the referenced amended Schedule 13G.

(3)

Based solely on information provided to Trustmark by The Robert M. Hearin Foundation on behalf of The Robert M. Hearin Foundation, The Robert M. Hearin Support Foundation, Capitol Street, LLC, Galaxie Corporation, Bay Street, LLC, Harbor Street, Inc. and H-HGalaxie Corporation (collectively, Hearin Foundation), as of December 31, 2020,January 18 2023, the Hearin Foundation beneficially owns 5,558,0243,983,560 shares of Trustmark common stock including 376,578314,078 shares owned by The Robert M. Hearin Foundation, 3,519,482 shares owned by The Robert M. Hearin Support Foundation, 1,388,964and 150,000 shares owned by Capitol Street, LLC, 23,000 shares owned by Bay Street, LLC and 250,000 shares owned by Harbor Street, Inc.LLC. Capitol Street, LLC is 100% owned by Galaxie Corporation, which

47


may be deemed to be controlled by The Robert M. Hearin Support Foundation. Bay Street, LLC and Harbor Street, Inc. may also be deemed to be controlled by The Robert M. Hearin Support Foundation, which owns an indirect 50% interest in each of Bay Street, LLC and Harbor Street, Inc. Voting and investment decisions concerning shares beneficially owned by The Robert M. Hearin Foundation and The Robert M. Hearin Support Foundation are made by the Foundations’ trustees: Robert M. Hearin, Jr., Matthew L. Holleman, III, Steve M. Hendrix, E. E. Laird, Jr., Laurie H. McRee and Alan W. Perry.

(3)(4)

According to Amendment No. 86 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 10, 2021,2023, by The Vanguard Group,Dimensional Fund Advisors LP, as of December 31, 2020, The Vanguard Group,2022, Dimensional Fund Advisors LP, through its subsidiaries, has sole voting power with respect to zero3,872,554 shares of Trustmark common stock and sole investment power with respect to 5,441,0543,946,176 shares of Trustmark common stock. The aggregate amount beneficially owned by each reporting person was 5,554,8313,946,176 shares of Trustmark common stock. The foregoing information has been included solely in reliance upon the disclosures contained in the referenced amended Schedule 13G.

(4)(5)

According to Amendment No. 42 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 16, 2021,14, 2023, by Dimensional Fund Advisors LP,EARNEST Partners, LLC,, as of December 31, 2020, Dimensional Fund Advisors LP,2022, EARNEST Partners, LLC,, through its subsidiaries, has sole voting power with respect to 3,888,6602,369,377 shares of Trustmark common stock and sole investment power with respect to 4,022,5203,689,701 shares of Trustmark common stock. The aggregate amount beneficially owned by each reporting person was 4,022,5203,689,701 shares of Trustmark common stock. The foregoing information has been included solely in reliance upon the disclosures contained in the referenced amended Schedule 13G.

(5)(6)

Includes 3,134 shares of time-based restricted stock with respect to which Directors Baker, Brown, Conerly, Cooley, Hays, Morrissette, Puckett, H. Walker, and Yates each has sole voting power but which cannot be transferred prior to vesting.

(6)

Includes 500 shares held in trust of which Mr. Brown is the co-trustee and sole beneficiary.

(7)

Includes 15,5901,500 shares of restricted stock with respectowned by her spouse as to which Mr. DeweyMs. Conerly has soleno voting power but which cannot be transferred prior to vesting and 32,107or investment control.

(8)

Includes 40,930 shares as to which Mr. Dewey shares voting and investment power with his spouse.

(8)(9)

Includes 1,3161,392 shares owned by his spouse as to which Mr. Eduardo has no voting or investment control.

(9)(10)

Includes 12,532 shares of restricted stock with respect to which Messrs. Greer and Harvey each has sole voting power, but which cannot be transferred prior to vesting.

(10)

Includes 40,448 shares as to which Mr. Greer shares voting and investment power with his spouse.

(11)

Includes 200 shares as to which Dr. Hays shares voting and investment power with his spouse.

(12)(11)

Includes 50,123 shares of restricted stock with respect to which Mr. Host has sole voting power but which cannot be transferred prior to vesting and 100,00080,000 shares held in trust of which Mr. Host’s spouse is trustee.

(13)(12)

Includes 75,138183,003 shares owned by his spouse as to which Mr. Puckett has no voting or investment control.

(14)(13)

Includes 7,519 shares of restricted stock with respect to which Mr. Tyler has sole voting power but which cannot be transferred prior to vesting.

(15)

Includes 56,04434,425 shares as to which Mr. WalkerStevens shares voting and investment power with his spouse.

(16)(14)

Includes shares held directly or indirectly by 2118 individuals: the currently-servingcurrently serving directors and NEOs listed herein, as well as Trustmark’s other remaining executive officers. Of these, a total of 166,604 are shares of restricted stock with respect to which the individuals have sole voting power, but which cannot be transferred prior to vesting. None of these shares are pledged as security.

DELINQUENT SECTION 16(a) REPORTS

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires Trustmark’s directors, executive officers and persons who own more than 10% of Trustmark’s common stock to file reports of their ownership and changes in ownership of Trustmark’s common stock. Trustmark prepares these reports for the directors and executive officers who request it on the basis of information obtained from them and Trustmark’s records. Trustmark believes that applicable Section 16(a) filing requirements were met during 2020, except that, due to an inadvertent error, a Form 4 was filed late for Maria L. Sugay relating to the acquisition of 1,500 shares of common stock on July 28, 2020.

PROPOSALS OF SHAREHOLDERS

 

Shareholders may submit proposals to be considered at the 20222024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders if they do so in accordance with Trustmark’s bylaws and applicable regulations of the SEC. In accordance with Trustmark’s bylaws as more fully described under “Corporate Governance -- Nomination of Directors” beginning on page 9, any shareholder intending to nominate a candidate for election to the Board at Trustmark’s 20222024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders must submit notice to the Secretary no earlier than December 15, 2021,2023, and no later than January 14, 2022.2024. Any shareholder intending to propose a matter for consideration at Trustmark’s 20222024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (other than a director nomination) must submit such proposal in writing to the Secretary at Trustmark Corporation, Post Office Box 291, Jackson, MS 39205 no later than January 29, 2022;2024; however, in order to be considered for inclusion in Trustmark’s proxy statement for the 20222024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the proposal must meet the requirements of SEC Rule 14a-8 and be submitted to the Secretary no later than November 15, 2021.2023. In addition, the proxy solicited by the Board for the 20222024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders will confer discretionary authority to vote on any shareholder proposal presented at the meeting if Trustmark has not received notice of such proposal by January 29, 2022.2024.

COST OF PROXY SOLICITATION

 

Solicitation of proxies will be primarily by mail and electronic delivery. Associates of Trustmark and its subsidiaries may be used to solicit proxies by means of telephone or personal contact but will not receive any additional compensation for doing so. Banks, brokers, trustees and nominees will be reimbursed for reasonable expenses incurred in sending proxy materials to the beneficial owners of such shares. The total cost of the solicitation will be borne by Trustmark.

AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS

 

Important Notice Regarding Internet Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on Tuesday, April 27, 2021:25, 2023:

This proxy statement, a form of the proxy card and Trustmark’s 20202022 Year in Review are available at investorrelations.trustmark.com. As permitted by rules adopted by the SEC, Trustmark is furnishing these proxy materials over the Internet to most shareholders. Those shareholders will not receive printed copies of these documents and instead will receive a Notice of Internet Availability containing instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the Internet. The Notice of Internet Availability also contains instructions on how each of those shareholders can request a printed copy of the proxy materials including this proxy statement, a proxy card and Trustmark’s 20202022 Year in Review. Shareholders who do not receive a Notice of Internet Availability will receive a printed copy of the proxy materials by mail.

48


ANNEX A:

AMENDED AND RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF TRUSTMARK CORPORATION

RESTATED

ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

OF

TRUSTMARK CORPORATION

FIRST: The name of the corporation is TRUSTMARK CORPORATION (the “Corporation”).

SECOND: The period of its duration is perpetual.

THIRD: The specific purposes for which the Corporation is organized stated in general terms are:

(1) To receive and hold the common stock and other securities of a commercial bank and other financial institutions and business interests.

(2) To engage in acts and activities which directly or indirectly relate to or complement the business of banking or other financial institutions and business interests.

(3) To engage in other investment activities and in the furnishing of goods and services to financial, trade, and commercial activities.

(4) To engage in any and all types of business activity.

(5) To do all things necessary, convenient, or desirable for the accomplishment of any of the purposes or the attainment of any of the objectives herein set forth and to do all things incidental thereto which are not prohibited by law.

FOURTH: The aggregate number of shares the Corporation is authorized to issue is (i) two hundred fifty million (250,000,000) shares of no-par common stock, and (ii) twenty million (20,000,000) shares of no-par preferred stock.

The common stock of the Corporation may be issued in such amounts and for such consideration as determined from time to time by the Board of Directors. The holders of common stock shall have unlimited voting rights and, subject to the preferences and rights, if any, of any holders of any other class of stock, holders of common stock shall have the right to receive such dividends as may be declared, from time to time, by the Board of Directors and shall be entitled to receive the net assets of the Corporation upon liquidation.

The Board of Directors of the Corporation is authorized, subject only to any limitations prescribed by law and the Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation, to provide for the issuance of shares of preferred stock of the Corporation in one or more classes or series without any further action of the shareholders of the Corporation by filing such Articles of Amendment as may be required by law establishing the number of such shares to be issued and the designation, powers, terms, preferences, rights and limitations thereof. The authority of the Board of Directors with respect to a class or series shall include, but not be limited to, the authority to determine the following:

(i) The number of shares constituting that class or series and the distinctive designation of that class or series;

(ii) The dividend rate on the shares of that class or series, whether dividends shall be cumulative, and if so, from which date or dates, and the relative rights and priorities, if any, of the right to the payment of dividends on shares of that class or series;

(iii) Whether that class or series shall have voting rights in addition to any voting rights required by law, and, if so, the terms of such voting rights;

(iv) Whether that class or series shall have conversion privileges, and, if so, the terms and conditions of such conversion, including provisions for adjustment of the conversion rate as a consequence of such events as the Board of Directors shall determine;

(v) Whether or not the shares of that class or series shall be redeemable, and, if so, the terms and conditions of such redemption, including the date, dates or events upon or after which they shall be redeemable, and the amount or method of determining the amount payable in case of redemption;

(vi) Whether that class or series shall have a sinking fund for the redemption or purchase of shares of that class or series, and, if so, the terms and amount of such sinking fund;

49


(vii) The rights of the shares of that class or series in the event of voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution, or winding-up of the Corporation, and the relative rights and priorities, if any, of payment of shares of that class or series; and

(viii) Any other relative rights, preferences, and limitations of that class or series.

FIFTH: The Corporation will not commence business until consideration of the value of at least One Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($1,000.00) has been received for the issuance of shares.

SIXTH: Shareholders shall have no preemptive right to acquire additional or treasury shares of the Corporation.

SEVENTH: The post office address of the Corporation’s registered office is 248 East Capitol Street, Jackson, Mississippi, and the name of its registered agent at such address is Michael A. King.

EIGHTH: The number of directors constituting the initial Board of Directors of the Corporation is three (3). Subsequently the Corporation shall have the number of directors (but not less than three) as may be designated in its bylaws, any additional directors to be elected at an annual or special meeting of shareholders called for that purpose.

NINTH: The name and post office address of each incorporator is:

Name

Street and Post Office Address

Robert M. Hearin

248 East Capitol Street

Jackson, Mississippi

John B. Tullos

248 East Capitol Street

Jackson, Mississippi

TENTH: Except in connection with vacancies as provided for in the Corporation’s bylaws, a nominee for director shall be elected at any meeting of shareholders at which a quorum is present if the votes cast for such nominee’s election exceed the votes cast against such nominee’s election; provided, however, that nominees for director shall be elected by a plurality of the votes cast at any meeting of shareholders for which the number of nominees exceeds the number of directors to be elected.

ELEVENTH: Holders of shares of the Corporation shall not be entitled to cumulate their votes in the election of directors.

TWELFTH: A director of the Corporation shall not be liable to the Corporation or its shareholders for money damages for any action, or any failure to take any action, as a director, except for: (a) the amount of financial benefit received by a director to which he is not entitled; (b) an intentional infliction of harm on the Corporation or the shareholders; (c) a violation of Section 79-4-8.33 of the Mississippi Code of 1972, as amended, as presently in effect or as amended thereafter, pertaining to liability for unlawful distributions; or (d) an intentional violation of criminal law. If Mississippi law is hereafter amended to authorize corporations to take corporate action further limiting or eliminating the personal liability of directors, then the liability of each director of the Corporation shall be limited or eliminated to the full extent permitted by Mississippi law as so amended from time to time. Neither the amendment or repeal of this Article, nor the adoption of any provision of these Articles of Incorporation inconsistent with this Article, shall eliminate or reduce the effect of this Article in respect of any matter occurring, or any cause of action, suit, or claim that, but for this Article, would accrue or arise, prior to such amendment, repeal, or adoption of an inconsistent provision.

50


 

 

LOGOLOGO

 

                                         P.O. BOX 291

                                         JACKSON, MS 39205-0291

  

LOGO

 

VOTE BY INTERNET

Before The Meeting - Go towww.proxyvote.com

 

 
  

Shareholders may use the Internet to transmit their voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information. Vote by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on April 26, 2021,24, 2023, for shares held directly and by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on April 21, 2021,19, 2023, for shares held in a Plan. To vote online, have the proxy card in hand, access the website above and follow the instructions given.

 
  

 

During The Meeting - Go to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/TRMK2021VOTE BY SMART PHONE

You may attendScan the meeting via the InternetQR Barcode above

Vote by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on April 24, 2023, for shares held directly and vote during the meeting. Have the information that is printedby 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on April 19, 2023, for shares held in a Plan.

VOTE BY MAIL

Shareholders should mark, sign and date their proxy card and return it in the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions.postage-paid envelope provided or return it to Trustmark Corporation, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

 

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE SHAREHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS

If you would like to reduce the environmental impact and costs incurred by Trustmark Corporation in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receive all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via email or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote before the meeting using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access shareholder communications electronically in future years.

 

VOTE BY MAIL

Shareholders should mark, sign and date their proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope provided or return it to Trustmark Corporation, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

 

TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:

V03491-P86313-Z84318                    KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —— — —— — — —
DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.DATED

 

  TRUSTMARK CORPORATION

Items of Business

 

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR all

nominees listed in Proposal 1, and FOR Proposals 2, 4, and 5,

and for a frequency of ONE YEAR for Proposal 3.

    

                

 

        

 

    1.     

Election of Directors - To elect a board of twelveeleven directors to hold office for the ensuing year or until their successors are elected and qualified.

   
   Nominees: For Against Abstain
   1a.   Adolphus B. Baker   
   1b. William A. Brown   
   1c. Augustus L. Collins   
   1d. Tracy T. Conerly   
   1e. Toni D. CooleyDuane A. Dewey   
   1f. Duane A. DeweyMarcelo Eduardo   
   1g. Marcelo EduardoJ. Clay Hays, Jr., M.D.   
   1h. J. Clay Hays, Jr., M.D.Gerard R. Host   
   1i. Gerard R. HostHarris V. Morrissette   

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally and all holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.

        
            
        
  For AgainstFor AgainstAbstain  
   1j.      Harris V. MorrissetteRichard H. Puckett     
   1k.     Richard H. PuckettWilliam G. Yates III     
1l.      William G. Yates III
 2.   

To provide advisory approval of Trustmark’s executive compensation.

   
1 Year2 Years3 YearsAbstain  
 3.

To provide an advisory vote on the frequency of advisory votes on Trustmark’s executive compensation.

ForAgainstAbstain
4.  

To approve an amendment and restatement of Trustmark’s articles of incorporation to provide for exculpation of directors in accordance with Mississippi law.

5.   

To ratify the selection of Crowe LLP as Trustmark’s independent auditor for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021.2023.

     
 4.6.   

To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting.

  
YesNo

Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting.

   
 
         
 

  

 

            

 

                    

   

            

 

                    

  

                    

  Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]                           Date          

                          

 

Signature (Joint Owners)                                                     Date        

  


 

 

 

LOGOLOGO

Important Notice Regarding Internet Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:

The 2023 Notice and Proxy Statement, 20202022 Year in Review and 20202022 Form 10-K

are available at www.proxyvote.com.

 

 

 

 

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  —— — — — — 

V03492-P86313-Z84318        

 

 

TRUSTMARK CORPORATION

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

APRIL 27, 202125, 2023

The shareholder(s) hereby appoint(s) Richard H. Puckett and Tracy T. Conerly, or either of them, as proxies, each with the power to appoint his/her substitute, and hereby authorize(s) them to represent and to vote, as designated on the reverse side of this proxy card, all of the shares of Common Stock of Trustmark Corporation that the shareholder(s) is/are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held virtually at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/TRMK2021Trustmark’s Corporate Office located at 248 East Capitol Street, Jackson, Mississippi 39201, on Tuesday, April 27, 2021,25, 2023, at 1:00 p.m. Central Time. The 16-digit control number included on this proxy card will be required to access the meeting.

THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED BY THE SHAREHOLDER(S). IF NO SUCH DIRECTIONS ARE MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED “FOR” THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES FOR THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS LISTED ON THE REVERSE SIDE, “FOR” ADVISORY APPROVAL OF TRUSTMARK’S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION, FOR A FREQUENCY OF “ONE YEAR” FOR ADVISORY VOTES ON TRUSTMARK’S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION, “FOR” APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF TRUSTMARK’S ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION TO PROVIDE FOR EXCULPATION OF DIRECTORS IN ACCORDANCE WITH MISSISSIPPI LAW, AND “FOR” RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF CROWE LLP AS INDEPENDENT AUDITOR FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2021.2023.

PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY USING THE ENCLOSED REPLY ENVELOPE OR VOTE BY INTERNET (SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR MORE INFORMATION).

CONTINUED AND TO BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE